1 / 27

National Perspectives on Long-Term Foster Care

National Perspectives on Long-Term Foster Care. MINNESOTA. NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON LONG TERM FOSTER CARE AS A PERMANECY OPTION Gerald P. Mallon, DSW National Resource Center for Foster care and Permanency Planning at the Hunter College School of Social Work

tilly
Download Presentation

National Perspectives on Long-Term Foster Care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Perspectives on Long-Term Foster Care

  2. MINNESOTA NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON LONG TERM FOSTER CARE AS A PERMANECY OPTION Gerald P. Mallon, DSWNational Resource Center for Foster care and Permanency Planningat the Hunter College School of Social Work A Service of the Children’s Bureau/ACF/DHHS

  3. There are multiple perspectives to be considered There are no one size fits all approaches to working with families There are some models that may work, with adaptations for the state of Minnesota There are no perfect solutions Some Things to Keep in Mind

  4. Assessing the Context of Permanency and Reunification Westat and Chapin Hall StudyDecember, 2001

  5. Assessing the Context of Permanency and Reunification Westat and Chapin Hall StudyDecember, 2001 Report examined six themes: 1. Identification and examination of reunification practice and services in 25 states; 2. Analysis of the patterns of reunification and reentry to track experiences of children in foster care:

  6. Assessing the Context of Permanency and Reunification Westat and Chapin Hall StudyDecember, 2001 3.An exploration of the role of race in reunification; 4. An examination of the reunification case decision making process

  7. Assessing the Context of Permanency and Reunification Westat and Chapin Hall StudyDecember, 2001 5. A framework for thinking about permanency with a focus on the status of reunification within the permanency continuum; 6. Consideration of the issues involved in evaluating programs for permanency and reunification

  8. Permanency and ReunificationTrends in 25 States Topics included: • state system structure • permanency options in the state • state viewpoints on permanency & reunification • service provider structure • current child welfare initiatives • future options for permanency and reunification

  9. Permanency Options Themes • Permanency is more than adoption • Expedited permanency options include: concurrent planning, guardianship, connections with fictive kin, and adoption

  10. Permanency Options Themes • 100% of states surveyed ranked reunification as the first permanency option • 65% ranked adoption as the second permanency option • relative care ranked third; 92% of states had a relative care option; 56% had a guardianship option

  11. Permanency Options Themes • 80% of states surveyed reported a long-term or permanent foster care option, particularly for older adolescents

  12. Permanent Foster Care Definition Permanent foster care is used as a goal when a foster parent is willing to keep the child in the home until emancipation, but is not willing to adopt

  13. Long Term Foster Care Definition Long term foster care is typically in a residential or group home setting or family foster home where the placement appears stable and long-term, but where there is no formal commitment to keep the child in the placement until emancipation

  14. Long Term Foster Care Part II of Definition Long term foster care is also used when there is some chance that the goal could be changed to reunification, relative placement, or adoption at some future date

  15. Increased Importance of Relatives • Relatives are receiving more attention as an important resource for permanency for children and youth • Efforts to locate relatives as soon as a child comes into care is a search & rescue matter - Red Cross metaphor • Funding and supporting initiatives to find adoptive homes and encourage and support relatives who can provide permanent homes also seem to be key

  16. Minnesota Permanency Options(in order of preference) • Return Home • Adoption • Relative legal custody • Long-term foster care

  17. Consequences of LTFC According to the National Resource Center for Youth Development, between 20,000 and 25,000 youth aged 16 and older transition from the foster care system each year.

  18. Consequences of LTFC AFCARS data indicates that of the 547,000 children in foster care as of March 1999, 45% were 11 years of age or older. 33% had been in care for more than three years;61% had a goal of either adoption or reunification;indicating that 39% had less defined plans.7% of youth in foster care (36,400) had a goal of emancipation

  19. Consequences of LTFC Youth in foster care often do not get the help they need with high school completion, employment, accessing health care, continued educational opportunities, housing and transitional living arrangements.

  20. Consequences of LTFC Studies of youth who have left foster care have shown they are more likely than those in the general population to not finish high school, be unemployed, and be dependent on public assistance. Many find themselves in prison, homeless, or parents at an early age.

  21. Array of Permanency Options for Older Adolescents • Decision Making Models: Family Group Conferencing: Mediation • Reunification: Search and Rescue (Red Cross Model); Individual Targeted Recruitment • Adoption: specialized for adolescents • Less Traditional Models: Finding what works; fictive kinship networks

  22. Models of Permanency Options for Older Adolescents in The U.S. • Massachusetts Families for Children Lauren Frey, (617) 445-6655, x. 342; Lfrey@csrox.org • You Gotta Believe, New York Pat O’ Brien, (800) 601-1779; ygbpat@msn.com • Intensive Family Reunification Program M.B. Lippold, (317) 924-7505, mblippold@mcjc.net

  23. Models of Permanency Options for Older Adolescents in The U.S. • Illinois Department of Children and Family Services: Permanency for Older Adolescent Waiver Project, Chicago, IL Peggy Slater, (312) 814-6861; pslater@idcfs.state.il.us,pegg • Catholic Community Services, Tacoma, WA Mary Stone Smith, (253) 225-0984; maryss@ccsww.org

  24. The Permanency For Teens Project. February, 1999. State of Iowa. For a copy, email NRCFCPP (karyn.lee@hunter.cuny.edu) Families for Teens. March, 2000. State of Ohio. For a copy email NRCFCPP. (karyn.lee@hunter.cuny.edu) Permanency Planning: Creating Life Time Connections. April, 2000. National report. For a copy download it from NRCYD web site (http://www.nrcys.ou.edu/fyi.htm) References & Resources

  25. Permanency Planning and the Older Adolescent: Connections for a Lifetime. April, 2001. State of Oklahoma. For a copy, email NRCFCPP (karyn.lee@hunter.cuny.edu) Foster Care: What Young People in the System Say is Working. January, 2001. State of Washington, Office of the Family and Children’s Ombudsman. For a copy download from www.governor.wa.gov/ofco References & Resources

  26. Assessing the Context of Permanency and Reunification in the Foster Care System. December, 2001. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services For a copy, email Westat (cookr1@westat.com) Courtney, M., Piliavin, I., Grogan-Kaylor, A., & Nesmith, A. (2001). Foster Youth Transitions to Adulthood: A Longitudinal View of Youth Leaving Care, Child Welfare, 80, (6), 685-717. References & Resources

  27. Gerald P. Mallon, DSWAssociate Professor Executive Director National Resource Center for Foster Care and Permanency Planningat the Hunter College School of Social Work129 East 79th Street, Suite 801New York, New York 10021 212 452-7053 - center line/ 212 452-7051 - faxmrengmal@aol.com - Emailwww.hunter.cuny.edu\socwork\nrcfcpp

More Related