loftus palmer 1974 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Loftus & Palmer (1974) - PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Loftus & Palmer (1974) -

Loading in 2 Seconds...

  share
play fullscreen
1 / 5
tiger-byers

Loftus & Palmer (1974) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

141 Views
Download Presentation
Loftus & Palmer (1974) -
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Loftus & Palmer (1974) - • Aim: - To see the effect of leading questions on Eye Witness Testimony

  2. Procedure • A laboratory experiment. Three groups of students, after watching a film of a car crash were asked questions (an independent measures design): - • The first group were asked – “How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?” • For the other group the words: - smashed into each other were substituted. • A control group were not asked about speed. • A week later they were re-interviewed and asked: - “Did you see any broken glass?”

  3. Results • The smashed group’s average estimated speed was 41mph • The hit group’s average estimated speed was 34mph • Although there was no broken glass at the scene 32% of the participants who heard the word smashed said there was, compared to only 14% of the hit group and only 12% of the control group.

  4. Conclusion • These words have very different connotations regarding speed and force of impact. The word smashed tends to imply broken glass and it is feasible to expect broken glass at a car accident. The participants had unconsciously incorporated these connotations into their memory of the event and it had affected their judgement of speed and memory of the scene.

  5. Evaluation