html5-img
1 / 30

Spatially resolved evolution of stellar active regions

Spatially resolved evolution of stellar active regions. Outline Unveiling the stellar surface Introduction to Doppler imaging Short term changes of active regions: differential rotation Long term evolution: spotcycles Future prospects. Thanks to:

tiana
Download Presentation

Spatially resolved evolution of stellar active regions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Spatially resolved evolution of stellar active regions Outline • Unveiling the stellar surface • Introduction to Doppler imaging • Short term changes of active regions: differential rotation • Long term evolution: spotcycles • Future prospects Thanks to: K.G. StrassmeierJ. RiceAIP - activity group Potsdam im Oktober 2003, M. Weber http://www.aip.de/groups/activity

  2. Sunspots & differential rotation • Equator rotates faster than the pole • “Rigidity” changes throughout the solar cycle and between Odd & Even cycles • Equatorial rotation faster in ONSC

  3. Starspots • Stars exhibit periodic light variations (often rotationally modulated) • Activity-related features found in starspots are present in stellar spectra (e.g. CaII H&K) • Chromospheric emission lines very strong in such stars

  4. Direct imaging of starspots • Faint Object Camera of HST • Interferometric techniques • Only very large & very near objects observable 'direct' image of Betelgeuse Gilliland & Dupree 1996, ApJ

  5. Photometric spot models • Positions and sizes of spots are optimized • Several bandpasses (V,R,I,..) are used for inversion • Only simple spot configurations can be retrieved • Some assumptions have to be made e.g. HK Lac: Oláh et al. 1997

  6. Principle of Doppler imaging Missing flux (in case of a dark spot) leaves a characteristc bump in spectral line profile.

  7. Doppler imaging1 • Missing flux from spots produce line profile deformations • 'bumps' move from blue to red wing of the profile due to the 'Doppler' effect. • Position of spots correspond to spot longitudes

  8. Doppler imaging2 • Speed of spots give indication of the latitude (more uncertain than the longitude) • 'bumps' from high latitude spots start out somewhere in the middle of the line wing, low latitude spots at the shoulder

  9. Short term variations: differential rotation • Artificial star (see Rice & Strassmeier 2000) •  = -0.05, P  7days • Note the sign convention for  (the solar case is positive) • []=degr/day (x 0.202 = µrad/s) • B & C not independent or:

  10. Simulating differential rotation • line profiles corresponding to 2 rotations of the model star • Using seven consecutive line profiles to reconstruct one image • Simulation of a medium-long (7 day) period star (II Peg)

  11. a. Reconstructing differential rotation by cross-correlation • Artifical maps created using =0.05 and P=6.72 days • Shown is original differential rotation, cross correlation measurements, and fit to cross-correlation • Fit coresponds to =0.06 and P=6.6 days • Introduced for AB Dor by Donati & Collier Cameron (1997) • Observations for two consecutive images needed • Spot/active region lifetimes?

  12. b. “Sheared-image method” • Donati et al. 2000 for RX J1508,6-4423 • Using  in inversion process • evaluating 2 for different periods and differential rotation values • Darkest value corresponds to best fit • aka “2 Landscape” method • One image is enough • But longer timeline is an advantage as long as it is smaller than the spot lifetimes

  13. c. Direct tracing of spots AB Dor; Collier Cameron et al. 2002Combining LSD and matched-filter analysis=0.0046 (Peq=0.5132 days)

  14. IM Peg • K2III, Vmax=5.8, vsini=27 • 70 nights of observations • 24.65 days rotation period (SB1) • Two consecutive stellar rotations well covered • Anti-solar differential rotation found ( -0.04)

  15. IM Peg, cont’d Doppler images with 24 days time separation

  16. IM Peg, cont’d • Cross correlation of the two average images • Monte-Carlo style calculation of 50 image-pairs & cross-correlations to estimate the error. • Best fit (red line) corresponds to =1/0=0.58/14.39 = -0.04

  17. IM Peg, cont’d • Including  in the inversion procedure “sheared image method” • Parameter variation to find the best fit. • Average value for the four calculations =1/0= -0.04 • Variation of both P and : =1/0= -0.02 ±0.01, P= 24.4 ±0.2

  18. IM Peg, cont’d • 2D-cross correlation reveals meridional flows • Sum of horizontal flow yields the differential rotation pattern • meridional flow appears to be pole-wards

  19. More stars • HD 218153 (K0III, V=7.6) • HD 31993 (K2III, V=7.48) • LQ Hya (K0III, V=7.5) • II Peg (K2IV, V=6.9) • HD 208472, IL Hya, HK Lac

  20. HD 218153 • Differential rotation and meridional flow detected • Weber & Strassmeier 2001 • =0.09 to 0.34 (lower/upper limit)

  21. HD 31993 • Differential rotation detected • Strassmeier et al. 2003 • = -0.15

  22. LQ Hya Donati et al. (in press) ; Kovari et al. (submitted) • P=1.59 days,  ≤ 0.05

  23. II Peg • P=6.72days • 5 consecutive Doppler images •   -0.05

  24. II Peg cont’d • Using  in the inversion leads to a non-zero value for some data sets only. • Dataset for one map spans more than one stellar rotation •  and period needs to be varied at the same time • P=6.62±0.05 days,  = -0.05±0.02 Variation of  and Period (“2-Landscape method”)

  25. Long term changes / Activity cycles • Solar 11yr activity cycle • Mt. Wilson survey found many cycles of solar-type stars • Tracing starspots over one activity cycle is a challenging task (not-only observing) time wise

  26. IM Peg / long term • Active longitudes (Berdyugina et al. 2000) • Probable activity cycle of 6.5yrs • Photometric activity cycles are 29.8 and 10.4 years (Ribarik et al 2003)

  27. II Peg / long term • Long-term variations of spots on II Peg (P9.5yr) • Active longitudes and “flip-flop”; 4.65yr halfcycle • Berdyugina et al. 1999

  28. Variable differential rotation? • Donati et al. (in press) • Differential rotation is different for V and I and for different epochs • Compare to yesterday’s talk by Lanza & Rodonò • Is there a link to activity cycles?

  29. Summary • 5 differential rotation measurements • Single star (HD 218153) has >0, other single star <0 • Kitchatinov & Rüdiger 1999: Prot, meridional flow, larger  for giants

  30. Outlook • The availability of several robotic telescope facilities will make long-term studies much easier. • In addition, stars not observable (e.g. P=1day) from one spot cat be observed from several facilities concurrently.

More Related