1 / 26

Revision Lecture 1

Revision Lecture 1. EC202: Microeconomic Principles II Frank Cowell . May 2008. Objectives of the lecture. A look back at Term 1 Introduction to exam preparation Reference materials used (1) exam papers (and outline answers) 2003 1(c) 2004 1(c) 2005 1(a) 2006 1(a) 2007 1(a)

tia
Download Presentation

Revision Lecture 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Revision Lecture 1 EC202: Microeconomic Principles II Frank Cowell May 2008

  2. Objectives of the lecture • A look back at Term 1 • Introduction to exam preparation • Reference materials used (1) • exam papers (and outline answers) • 2003 1(c) • 2004 1(c) • 2005 1(a) • 2006 1(a) • 2007 1(a) • Reference materials used (2) • CfD presentations 2.9 • related to past exam question • (...more to follow next week)

  3. Principles • Scope of exam material • what’s covered in the lectures… • … is definitive for the exam • Resit • syllabus for 2007/8 is same as 2006/7 • so resit candidates from last year get the same paper as new candidates • Structure and format of paper • follows that of last three years • check out the rubric from, say, 2007 paper • Mark scheme • 40 marks for question 1 (8 marks for each of the five parts) • 20 marks for each of the other three questions • multipart questions: except where it’s obvious, roughly equal marks across parts

  4. Question Style – three types • 1 Principles • reason on standard results and arguments • can use verbal and/or mathematical reasoning • 2 Model solving • a standard framework • you just turn the wheels • 3 Model building • usually get guidance in the question • longer question sometimes easier? • One type not necessarily “easier” or “harder” than another • get you to display different skills • part A (question 1) usually gets you to do both types 1 and 2 • type 3 usually only in parts B and C of paper Examples from past question 1

  5. 2004 1(c) • Straightforward “principles” question • Just say what you need to say

  6. 2005 1(a) • Straight “principles” • Note contrast between firm and consumer • Be sure to give your reasons

  7. 2006 1(a) • Principles again • But format of question gives you a hint… • …write out decomposition formula • Then read off results

  8. 2003 1(c) • A model-solving question • (i) just set E(r) = 0 and twiddle • (ii) check what happens to E if you change r • (iii) draw diagram and reason

  9. 2007 1(a) – question and approach • A “hybrid” question • Mainly model-solving • But there’s an important principle will a solution even exist? • What’s the solution to the monopolist’s problem? • Approach: • Find the expression for profits • Then try to maximise…

  10. 2007 1(a) – main answer • To get profits we need demand function • You could just jump to last line • Now write down profit expression • Note wording in last line

  11. 2007 1(a) – finishing off answer • Use knowledge of basic principles • Effectively the competitive case • No solution! • (we covered this in lectures)

  12. Long questions • Let’s look at an example • taken from exercise in the book • but of “exam type” difficulty • covered in CfD • Illustrates type 2 question • Ex 2.9 is mainly model solving • next week: look at model building • Look out for tips • Use simple principles to give you a shortcut to the answer • Use pictures where they help

  13. Ex 2.9(1): Question • purpose: demonstrate relationship between short and long run • method: Lagrangean approach to cost minimisation. First part can be solved by a “trick”

  14. Ex 2.9(1): Long-run costs • Production function is homogeneous of degree 1 • increase all inputs by a factor t > 0 (i.e. z→tz)… • …and output increases by the same factor (i.e. q→tq) • constant returns to scale in the long run • CRTS implies constant average cost • C(w, q) / q = A (a constant) • so C(w, q) = Aq • differentiating: Cq(w, q) = A • So LRMC = LRAC = constant • Their graphs will be an identical straight line

  15. Ex 2.9(2): Question method: • Standard Lagrangean approach

  16. Ex 2.9(2): short-run Lagrangean • In the short run amount of good 3 is fixed • z3 = `z3 • Could write the Lagrangean as • But it is more convenient to transform the problem thus • where

  17. z2 z1 Ex 2.9(2): Isoquants • Sketch the isoquant map • Isoquants do not touch the axes • So maximum problem must have an interior solution

  18. Ex 2.9(2): short-run FOCs • Differentiating Lagrangean, the FOCS are • This implies • To find conditional demand function must solve for l • use the above equations… • …and the production function

  19. Ex 2.9(2): short-run FOCs (more) • Using FOCs and the production function: • This implies • where • This will give us the short-run cost function

  20. Ex 2.9(2): short-run costs • By definition, short-run costs are: • This becomes • Substituting for k: • From this we get • SRAC: • SRMC:

  21. q Ex 2.9(2): short-run MC and AC marginal cost average cost

  22. Ex 2.9(3): Question method: • Draw the standard supply-curve diagram • Manipulate the relationship p = MC

  23. p q Ex 2.9(3): short-run supply curve • average cost curve • marginal cost curve • minimum average cost • supply curve p q

  24. Ex 2.9(3): short-run supply elasticity • Use the expression for marginal cost: • Set p = MC for p≥p • Rearrange to get supply curve • Differentiate last line to get supply elasticity

  25. Ex 2.9: Points to remember • Exploit CRTS to give you easy results • Try transforming the Lagrangean to make it easier to manipulate • Use MC curve to derive supply curve

  26. Next time • Think more about method for long questions • Look at a few CfD • 4.12, 4.13 • 5.1 • 7.8 • 9.6 • See how they illustrate method • Connect these to past exam questions

More Related