Download
1 / 6
60 likes | 72 Views
According to Jay Sawyer of Northbrook, the intentions of the Electoral College System are no longer relevant in America. Jay highlights that when the Constitution was written, there were only a fraction of the states there are today. Moreover, with fifty states in the country, the application of the Electoral College has many implications for campaigning during presidential elections. Jay shares that in the 2016 election, two-thirds of the general-election campaign events were in just 6 states. Moreover, among Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, the candidates spent 71% of their advertising money. He says that the presidential election is presumed to represent the voices of all 50 states of America, not just a few. Another very important point Jay Sawyer of Northbrook highlights is that in an already disproportionate system, democratic votes in solid-red and Republican voters in solid-blue states are often discouraged from voting.
E N D
Jay Sawyer of Northbrook Talks about Why He Thinks the US Should Abolish the Electoral College
Why Was The Electoral College System Created In The US? • Jay Sawyer of Northbrook notes that the framers of the constitution initially created the Electoral College System to prevent direct election of the President. • In Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist #68, he stated “that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station.” • Hamilton didn’t trust the procedure of electing the President by the general mass. Instead, he felt a selected group of individuals known as the Electoral College should be handed over this crucial task.
The Intentions of the Electoral College System Are No Longer Relevant In the US • According to Jay Sawyer of Northbrook, the intentions of the Electoral College System are no longer relevant in America. • He feels that the American electorate is capable enough to directly elect their own president, thanks to the huge development in the field of technology and education.
More on Why Sawyer Considers Abolishing the Electoral College an Important Step • Jay Sawyer highlights that when the Constitution was written, there were only a fraction of the states there are today. • Moreover, with fifty states in the country, the application of the Electoral College has many implications for campaigning during presidential elections. • Jay shares that in the 2016 election, two-thirds of the general-election campaign events were in just 6 states. Moreover, among Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, the candidates spent 71% of their advertising money. • He says that the presidential election is presumed to represent the voices of all 50 states of America, not just a few.
Abolishing the Electoral College Would Also Ensure That Votes in Every State Have Equal Weight • Another very important point Jay Sawyer of Northbrook highlights is that in an already disproportionate system, democratic votes in solid-red and Republican voters in solid-blue states are often discouraged from voting. • That’s because they feel their vote isn’t as valid in their party-dominated states. • Hence, abolishment of the Electoral College would also help ensure that votes in every states, whether big or small, red or blue, have equal weight.
