1 / 13

CLARIN Centers for a Sustainable Infrastructure

CLARIN Centers for a Sustainable Infrastructure. Daan Broeder, MPI for Psycholinguistics Jan Odijk , Utrecht University. Content. The Problem: Stable S ervices in a Dynamic World CLARIN foundations: we have a center based solution CLARIN Centers, how is that working out?

Download Presentation

CLARIN Centers for a Sustainable Infrastructure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CLARIN Centers for a Sustainable Infrastructure Daan Broeder, MPI for Psycholinguistics Jan Odijk, Utrecht University

  2. Content • The Problem: Stable Services in a Dynamic World • CLARIN foundations: we have a center based solution • CLARIN Centers, how is that working out? • Adjustments required? • Recommendations

  3. CLARIN centers From the start centers played an important role in the services infrastructure architecture planning “a backbone of CLARIN centers” is a phrase that is often found in the early documents. Fundamental: many centers are sharing responsibility Strategy: • Explicit responsibility for services • Explicit contact point Centers can gain exposure: • Explicit acknowledgement after assessment of: • Organizational aspects (DSA) • Technical competence (services)

  4. Center variety • Originally CLARIN centers are mainly research institutes, and university departments • … many differences both in research focus and size • The first national projects were CLARIN-D and NL with ample means and many candidate centers • … some competition was not thought as evil • In some other disciplines a single or a few centers are dominant in research infrastructures • Which depending on their funding situation can make the infrastructure very vulnerable • However “single/few center infrastructure” is a valid approach

  5. Center Taxonomy Assessment K R E C B A L PIDs AAI service FIM CMDI Center Registry DSA PID service ISOCat VCregistry CMDIRegistry VLO

  6. Center infra evolution • Newer national CLARIN projects often have one single CLARIN center that is supported by several partners and serves the whole community • Consequence of smaller budget (compared with NL and D) • … or a smart way to save money? • One CLARIN center costs less and can represent many interests or organizations • However, is this stable? • ‘New’ trend: inclusion of broad data centers, libraries, … • Libraries participating in the core (No) … or still in the periphery (NL)

  7. CLARIN Services sustainability • CLARIN services are not the core business for research institutes (and certainly not of general data centers) • Usually funded from the national project • … vulnerable for funding changes • Offering services and data should be seen as a important and funded from beyond CLARIN • … or better: services should be anchored in an institute’s own workflow • Nevertheless all may fail • So centers should accept take over services from others • Essential services can be doubled

  8. How vulnerable are we? • Center downscaling • MPI has reconsidered its project strategy • A-services must be relocated • Loss of expert staff • Funding gaps • Research strategy changes

  9. We need an Elastic Infrastructure What does that mean in a European context? • No dependence on a single national project • Certainly not dependent on one or a few centers • Coordinating parties are able to compensate for shrinking or disappearing centers • By: • Enable moving services to other centers (and test this) • Doubling of essential A-services • Enable easy outsourcing of services to compute (E-)centers • Fund software maintainers & developers and reserve adequate resources on national & EU level • Flag requirements to national & EU funders

  10. Still need stable lynch-pins I • Assumption of long-term well funded stable research-institutes is perhaps not tenable • What is well-funded, stable and sustainable? • New developments as general data-centers, e-science organizations, EU data management infra projects etc. • Problems: too general approaches, motivation • Service specificity can be (partly) solved by • Careful integration of the specific with the general by modular policy based services. Will need some extra (shared) costs • Would mean CLARIN as a front-office for a general service provider

  11. Still need stable lynch-pins II • libraries and national archives are attractive partners • These are obviously also getting their share of the national budgets • Nobody questions their sustainability • Problems: motivation, (old fashioned) practices, too general approaches. • Motivation will be solved e.g. libraries need to reposition themselves • Results vary per country countries, but in some libraries are already a core part of CLARIN national projects • Can expect the need for libraries to reposition will lead touseful modern data management practices • Service specificity could be (partly) solved by CLARIN (and others) collaborating and even partly integrating with them

  12. Summing up to ‘Easy’ Recommendations • A CLARIN center should: • make providing (CLARIN compatible) services and data part of its mission • use those also for the center’s own research workflow • A-services must be built from the start with easy relocation in mind (and this should be tested) • Reserve adequate resources for outsourcing of services and funding of service development • Include broader multi-disciplinary institutes & service providers and see how to integrate with them • Starting with libraries and data centers & DM projects • Develop models in collaboration for building discipline specific services on top of general ones

  13. Thank You for your attention

More Related