1 / 19

Saving Money, Saving Lives Population-Based Quality Improvement

Saving Money, Saving Lives Population-Based Quality Improvement. Edward F. Donovan Child Health Services Research Meeting June 24, 2006. Regional Systems of Perinatal Care The Investment Case for Quality Improvement. Economic resources spent for perinatal care

thais
Download Presentation

Saving Money, Saving Lives Population-Based Quality Improvement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Saving Money, Saving LivesPopulation-Based Quality Improvement Edward F. Donovan Child Health Services Research Meeting June 24, 2006

  2. Regional Systems of Perinatal CareThe Investment Case for Quality Improvement Economic resources spent for perinatal care - taxes/charity (public health & gov’t sponsored insurance) - after-tax wages (employment-sponsored insurance) Potential savings - avoid preterm births and consequent lifelong handicaps Because many individuals receive a mix of tax-supported and employment-supported services, quality improvement should occur at the health system level

  3. Population-based quality improvement to save lives and money Regionalized Perinatal Care in Ohio • Geographically defined systems of perinatal care • Individuals receive care from different parts of the system • Test population-based QI: - caregiver/policy teams - data systems operational - QI collaborative Investment case for population-based QI

  4. EXTREME PREMATURITY[birth at less than 29 weeks gestational age] • 60-70% of deaths in the first year of life are associated with EXTREME PREMATURITY • 50% of lifelong handicapping conditions with onset in infancy are associated with EXTREME PREMATURITY • 1% of births are EXTREMELY PREMATURE, but 25% of spending for perinatal care

  5. Population-based QI to improve perinatal care in Ohio Outcome: Extreme prematurity QI Methods: • Real-time, longitudinal measures of outcomes: e-birth-certificates • Improvement collaboratives: PDUC • Benchmarking • Transparent tests of change

  6. Benchmarking • If whites (83% of births) in less well performing regions had the same proportions of births 25-28 weeks GA as the best performing region, there would be roughly 135 fewer infants in this category per year in Ohio • If African Americans (17% of births) in less well performing regions had the same proportions of 25-28 weeks GA as African Americans in the best performing region, there would be approximately 175 fewer infants in this category per year 135 + 175 = 310 fewer extremely preterm infants per year

  7. Return on Investment Saving a few lives and a lot of money 80 fewer deaths per year 100 fewer children per year with life long disability Total annual savings in birth spending: $ 78 million [5% of total birth spending in Ohio] Total savings in Medicaid birth spending: $ 24 million Ohio Medicaid budget for families and children = $ 2 billion (5% of Ohio’s annual spending) Medicaid savings = 1% per year [not counting cost of lifelong handicap] Ohio Medicaid budget for children has been increasing 3.6% per year

  8. Improving quality of perinatal care for geographic regions • Outcomes depend on multiple sources of care • Optimal care depends on linkages among care sources • Processes of care are readily identifiable • Population-based outcome measures are available in existing administrative data sets (birth and death certificates) • In many areas, perinatal care is “regionalized” • Benchmarking and learning collaboratives are possible within jurisdictions (e.g. states)

  9. Opportunities to Improve • Identify best evidence • Highly reliable use of best evidence • Identify best practices • Highly reliable implementation of best practices

  10. Quality of Care Improvement • Real-time measurement of processes and outcomes • Small tests of change • Benchmarking • Improvement collaboratives: constituency determined from the users perspective • Transparency

  11. Infant Mortality U.S. international rank in 2002 24th African American IM = 14.4 White IM = 5.8 U.S. international rank in 2002 for low risk infants 7th

  12. Improving the perinatal care system: Users’ perspectives’ What types of care do I need? Prevention- Care in the public sector: nutrition, housing, social services, immunizations, primary care Care in the private sector: primary care (pre-conception, prenatal)

  13. Improving the perinatal care system: The users perspective What types of care do I need? Treatment- Care in the public sector: Public health clinics, ‘public’ hospitals Care in the private sector: Offices, birthing centers, hospitals

  14. OHIO

More Related