Boundary Issues and Planning Solutions for GCPO, SALCC, and Appalachian LCC Coordination
This document outlines critical boundary issues and potential solutions regarding the management and coordination of the Gulf Coast Prairie/Oak Woods (GCPO) and South Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (SALCC) in relation to the Appalachian LCC. It discusses regional aquatic and terrestrial planning responsibilities, the implications of overlapping jurisdictions, and recommendations for stakeholder consultations, particularly concerning the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint Rivers Basin. The role of various committees and consultations with aquatic invertebrate experts is emphasized.
Boundary Issues and Planning Solutions for GCPO, SALCC, and Appalachian LCC Coordination
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Boundary Issues (Tab 4-1) • GCPO LCC – Appalachian LCC • Interior Low Plateaus • GCPO LCC – South Atlantic LCC • Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint Rivers Basin
Steering Cmte Discussion/Action? • In your notebooks (Tab 4-1) • App LCC Consultation with Aquatic Invert Experts • Ohio R. Basin relative to LCC, JV boundaries • Freshwater Mollusc Cons. Society Letter (2011) • CHJV letter (2010) • AMJV letter (2010) • Potential Solution? • GCPO LCC to take lead on terrestrial planning • App LCC to take lead on aquatic planning • Karst?
GCPO LCC – South Atlantic LCCApalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint Rivers Basin
Steering Cmte Discussion/Action? • Potential Solutions? • Move GCPOLCC/SALCC line to EGCP JV line. • SALCC take lead responsibility on ACF Basin planning. • Recommended Action: • Defer decision until after consultation with AL and FL. • Potential Solutions? • Move GCPOLCC/SALCC line to EGCP JV line.