1 / 16

Resource Cost Working Group February 1, 2017 WMS Update

Resource Cost Working Group February 1, 2017 WMS Update. Significant Capital Costs for RMR Contracts. RCWG discussed initial draft NPRR Requires ERCOT Board approval for all RMR Agreements, as directed by WMS

tcaldwell
Download Presentation

Resource Cost Working Group February 1, 2017 WMS Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Resource Cost Working Group February 1, 2017 WMS Update

  2. Significant Capital Costs for RMR Contracts • RCWG discussed initial draft NPRR • Requires ERCOT Board approval for all RMR Agreements, as directed by WMS • Discussed removing capital cost threshold that allows for RMR agreements > 12 months • On-hold pending PUCT rulemaking relating to RMR (i.e. no vote today)

  3. Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Background: • Some Resources were mitigated in real-time to below their actual cost due to large differences between FIP and their actual gas price on certain days in February and March 2014 • NPRR664 implemented a manual Real-Time Make-Whole Payment process for exceptional fuel events that expired May 1, 2015 • Also provided for a resource-specific Fuel Index Price (FIPR) of HSC, Waha or weighted-average • NPRR714 extended the manual process for Make-Whole with a sunset date of 6/1/17

  4. Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Background (continued): • TAC assignment to investigate alternatives to NPRR664 • Prefer exceptional fuel costs in LMPs to avoid make-whole and uplift, but also concerned with incorrect LMPs • In the past, RCWG/WMS have discussed several options without reaching consensus • Option 1: Continue with existing Real-Time Make-Whole Payment • Option 2: Pursue “Exceptional Fuel Cost flag” concept • Option 3: Increase MOC’s during Cold Weather Events • ERCOT proposed a new option

  5. Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events • ERCOT proposed new option • During an exceptional fuel event, QSEs could submit a weighted average intraday fuel price (WAFP) to ERCOT via MMS • ERCOT would use the WAFP in the MOC calculation • After the event, QSEs would provide documentation of the WAFP to ERCOT for verification, including attestation by an officer • RCWG discussion focused on risks/benefits of new option and “Exceptional Fuel Cost Flag” option • WMS discussion or direction?

  6. Generation Resource Compensation during a Market Restart • Discussed compensation for renewable resources during a market restart • Wind, solar, hydro, biomass • Questions about curtailment of renewables during and after black start, and before market restart • ERCOT to provide clarification at next RCWG meeting

  7. Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder Issue: • TAC assignment to WMS to RCWG • Review appropriate treatment of fixed costs such as pipeline capacity charges and penalties in the Fuel Adder Background: • Fuel Adder is used in calculation of Offer Caps and Make-whole payments • Default is $0.50/MMBtu, but a Resource can elect to submit an “actual” fuel adder, subject to verification by ERCOT • Fuel costs can include a number of components, such as commodity and capacity costs for transportation, storage, etc. Status: • RCWG has developed and discussed a list of gas cost components • Working on guiding principles

  8. Long-Term Solution to Coal Index Price • VCMRR014 provided an interim solution • $1.10 fuel adder for coal and lignite resources that is added to the $1.50 Solid Fuel Price • Sunsets 6/1/18 • ERCOT developing revised draft NPRR/VCMRR for Coal Fuel Index Price • “CFIP” Coal Fuel Index Price: “Delivered to ERCOT” index price based on PRB 8400 coal plus rail transportation • $0/MMBtu fuel adder for coal and lignite

  9. WMS Open Action Items for RCWG

  10. APPENDIX

  11. Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Overview of NPRR664 • Resource can designate a Fuel Index Price (FIPR) of HSC, Waha or weighted-average • Includes Real-Time Make-Whole Payment provision for exceptional fuel cost events • Exceptional event: Actual price paid for delivered fuel must be greater than the FIPR plus the fuel adder plus a threshold fuel price of $2/MMBtu • Uplift allocated by LRS • NPRR664 Approval • Authorized manual workaround to implement Make-Whole Payment for this winter, to be discontinued on May 1, 2015 • ERCOT to revisit the rank and priority with TAC before project initiation

  12. Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 1 - Continue with manual implementation of NPRR 664 • Rationale: Number of exceptional fuel events may be too small to justify significant system changes at this time • Continue with manual calculation of make-whole payments • Lower the priority for implementation of new Fuel Index Prices • Revisit if manual process becomes too burdensome

  13. Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 2 - Pursue “Exceptional Fuel Cost flag” concept • Resource will not be mitigated if it sets an exceptional fuel cost “flag”, submitted with its Energy Offer Curve (EOC) • If set, Resource will be subject to verification of the exceptional fuel costs used in its EOC • Rationale: Exceptional fuel costs would be reflected in LMP’s, possibly eliminating need for make-whole and new index fuel prices (i.e. NPRR664)

  14. Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 3 – Increase MOC’s during Cold Weather Events • When ERCOT issues a cold weather event and is allowed to procure more reserves through a SASM, increase the CF multipliers used in the MOC calculation by 0.50. • Retain manual make-whole process in case higher MOC’s are not sufficient to compensate Resource’s exceptional fuel costs • Rationale: Increase MOC’s during periods when the risk of gas price spikes is higher and provide headroom for exceptional fuel costs in LMPs. Keep manual make-whole process as a backstop. • May be an overly broad solution

  15. Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 3 proposed multipliers: During an ERCOT cold weather event, increase the mitigated offer cap multipliers in 4.4.9.4.1(e) by 0.50.

  16. Exceptional Fuel Costs in Real-Time Mitigated Offer Cap • Proposal for modifying the Mitigated Offer Cap • The Mitigated Offer Cap (MOC) can be modified such that it incorporates exceptional fuel costs to ensure LMPs reflect the incremental cost of intraday fuel (if included in EOC). • The MOC can be modified as follow: • The greater of: • [Generic Heat Rate * FIP, • {IHR * Max [(FIP + FA), WAFP] + O&M} * Multiplier] • Where, • WAFP($/MMBtu) = For the affected period, fuel cost based on the actual exceptional fuel prices, weighted by applicable volumes.

More Related