110 likes | 262 Views
Fixed or Flexible: The Effect of Negative Feedback on One’s Religious Identity. Erika Brown Oklahoma State University. Previous Research. Dealing with religiosity (Mullet, Barros, Frongia, Usai & Shafighi, 2003) Dealing with effects of negative events on self-esteem (DeHart & Pelham, 2007)
E N D
Fixed or Flexible: The Effect of Negative Feedback on One’s Religious Identity Erika Brown Oklahoma State University
Previous Research • Dealing with religiosity (Mullet, Barros, Frongia, Usai & Shafighi, 2003) • Dealing with effects of negative events on self-esteem (DeHart & Pelham, 2007) • Anticipated that those highly religious will re-evaluate their identity more so than those who are not religious.
Method: Participants • 24 undergraduate students • Mean age of 19 years. • 63% were female • Majority were Caucasian (80%) • All were Christian
Method: Procedure • Participants first completed SIBS • Categorized into high or low religious identity • Pre-Feedback rating of subjective religiosity
Method: Procedures • Took difficult Bible quiz • Filler task • Ruse • Negative feedback • Post-Feedback subjective religiosity
Results • Pre- and Post-Feedback ratings overall • Matched-pairs t-test • t(23) = 1.79, p = .086, two –tailed • High and low Religious Identity • Independent samples t-test • t(14) = -1.823, p = .090, two-tailed
Discussion • Overcompensation • Limitations: • Low power • High SIBS scores • Future research • Replicate • Different denominations