1 / 57

A Rehospitalization Reduction Program on a Geriatric Skilled Nursing Unit

A Rehospitalization Reduction Program on a Geriatric Skilled Nursing Unit. Randi Berkowitz, MD Hebrew SeniorLife. Why decrease readmissions?. Excellence in care errors patient satisfaction staff satisfaction Financial referrals subacute beds long-term care

taylor
Download Presentation

A Rehospitalization Reduction Program on a Geriatric Skilled Nursing Unit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Rehospitalization Reduction Program on a Geriatric Skilled Nursing Unit Randi Berkowitz, MD Hebrew SeniorLife

  2. Why decrease readmissions? • Excellence in care • errors • patient satisfaction • staff satisfaction • Financial • referrals • subacute beds long-term care • census • reimbursement/patient

  3. Learning Objectives • Define the scope of the issue of rehospitalization in subacute care nationally • Describe innovative programs to reduce transfer out to the hospital • Show how CQI process involving transfer can lower hospital readmission rates whole improving patient safety and quality of care

  4. Large geographic variation

  5. Hospital Readmissions within 30 days from SNFs are common • Of ~1.8 million SNF admissions in the U.S. in 2006, 23.5% were re-admitted to an acute hospital within 30 days • In Massachusetts the rate is 26% • Cost of these readmissions = $4.3 billion

  6. Common Reasons for Transfers • Medical instability • Availability of: • On-site primary care providers • Stat tests, IVs • Inadequate assessments to identify early changes • Communication gaps • Family issues/preferences • Lack of advance directives (DNR, DNH)

  7. Do They Have to Go? As many as 45% of admissions of nursing home residents to acute hospitals may be inappropriate Saliba et al, J AmerGeriatr Soc 48:154-163, 2000 In 2004 in NY, Medicare spent close to $200 million on hospitalization of long-stay NH residents for “ambulatory care sensitive diagnoses” Grabowski et al, Health Affairs 26: 1753-1761, 2007

  8. Adverse Events Common Coming and Going • 46% of hospitalized patients have 1 or more regularly taken medications omitted without explanation. Potential for harm estimated at 39%. • Cornish Arch Int Med 2005; 165: 424-9 • Transfers from NH to hospital have an average of 3 med changes. 20% lead to adverse drug events. • Boockvar Arch Int Med 2004 (164) 545-50

  9. Conclusion • Rehospitalizations are going to be a prime focus coming years • New system paradigm will be needed to meet the demand for prevention of readmissions • Focus of enhancing care in the SNF and community treatment will take precedence

  10. It’s a new world Obamacare! • Center for Medicare Medicaid Innovation • $10 billion • Triple aim • better health • better care • lower cost • Innovation Advisors Program - Current fellow

  11. How? • Admission • Stay on unit • Discharge

  12. Bucket #1: Problems on Admission • Ineffective communication of prognosis / options • PCP out of loop • Inadequate care plans for recurrent symptoms

  13. Reduce AVOIDABLE hospital transfers Approach to the Problem: Admission • MD standardized discussions • Communication family and PCP • High risk patients • Automatic Palliative Care consult • Flag for entire team

  14. Bucket #2: Stay on Unit:Problems With Team Operation • Disciplines operating in silos • Failure to identify problems early • Failure to learn from mistakes

  15. Reduce AVOIDABLE hospital transfers Approach to the Problem: Stay on the Unit • Team Improvement for the Patient and Safety (TIPS) conference • Call to hospital • Root cause analysis

  16. Bucket #3: Problems With Home Discharge • Poor hand off to next team • No teach back with patient/HCP • No standardized discharge summary/ nursing process

  17. Reduce AVOIDABLE hospital transfers Approach to the Problem: Home Discharge • Project RED • Written home care plan from electronic medical record • Making specific for geriatric use • E.g. advance directives, diet, VNA, assistive devices • Standardized discharge summaries

  18. Target Population • All admissions to the RSU subacute unit • 1000 admissions a year • 3NP/3MD- geriatric and palliative care certified

  19. Process and Outcome Measures • Admission • 90% patients have discussion with MD • Prognosis • Rehospitalizations past 6 months • Communication family and PCP • Patient/ family satisfaction survey

  20. Advisory Committee • Family Involvement - Daughter • Outside institutions - Director Subacute Care- Partners • Biostatistician • Information Technologist • Continuum - homecare • Senior leadership at HSL • Rabbi from palliative care • Staff nurse, unit coordinator, therapy, social work, aide, administration

  21. Process and Outcome Measures • Middle - Stay on the unit • Unplanned discharge rates • Benchmarked staff safety survey for staff AHRQ • Attendance TIPS

  22. Process and Outcome Measures Discharge Home • 30 day readmission rates after discharge from SNF • Satisfaction survey of discharge preparedness

  23. Perceived Facilitators/Barriers • Pt acceptance of less aggressive approaches • Increased liability • Increase cost keeping sicker patients • Difficulty obtaining information from hospital • Time needed to engage primary care • Lack of practitioner access to computer systems in key referral sites • Limited IT resources for Project RED

  24. RSU Acute Transfer/Total Discharges

  25. Data Unplanned Transfers • January 2008- June 2009 compared with post TIPS July 2009-November 2009 • Massachusetts 30 day 22-28%Pre-intervention 16.5%Post-intervention 13.3%Rate Reduction -20%

  26. Pre and Post Discharge Dispositions Pre N=862 Community 68.6% Died 1.2% LTC 13.8% Hospital 16.5% Post N=8863 73% 2.2% 11.6% 13.3%

  27. When staff report something that could harm a resident, someone takes care of itAgree and Strongly Agree

  28. On this unit, we talk about ways to keep incidents from happening againAgree and Strongly Agree

  29. Staff ideas and suggestions are valued on this unitAgree and Strongly Agree

  30. It is easy for staff to speak up about problems on this unit Agree and Strongly Agree

  31. Staff feel like they are part of a teamAgree and Strongly Agree

  32. Staff are blamed when a resident is harmedDisagree and Strongly Disagree

  33. Implications for HSL • Family/patient involvement • Create culture of system management rather than blame • Share knowledge learned across sites/teams • True multidisciplinary team- swarm the problem and front line solutions which can be used organizational wide • Use of run/control charts to guide CQI into frontlines and understand common cause variability

  34. Why take on this pain financially? Census, census, census • Hospital care! • CMS demonstration project • Preferred provider network

  35. RED • Computerized After Hospital Care Plan • Code status, meds, VNA info, PCP info, speech and therapy directions • Is Meditech good for something? • Phone number to call with questions with picture care coordinator and name • Give at first care plan meeting and on discharge update

  36. RED Change culture patient/family empowerment Involvement of front line staff- NASA comparison Culture of QA and monthly feedback Clear numerical goals for entire team

  37. Project RED Empowering the PatientSetting goals of January, 2011 How are we doing? How good EXACTLY do we want to be?

  38. Respondents Reached • 305 patients • 96% • 30 days after discharge RSU

  39. Rehospitalization Once Home • 56/302 patients • 18.5% • GOAL- We will reduce this to 15% or 2.7%

  40. How many see PCP in 30 days? • 171/282 • 60.6% • GOAL - We will increase this to 75%.

  41. Understood Medications Very Well or Extremely Well • 216/279 • 77.4% • GOAL- We will increase this to 80%

  42. Understood Medications Very Well or Extremely Well • 216/279 • 77.4% • GOAL- We will increase this to 80%

More Related