Photon Energy Calibration and Position Determination in E/M Scale Using H's Vishnu V. Zutshi BNL
260 likes | 343 Views
Explore the importance of absolute calibration, non-linearity correction, and optimal position measurement in EM scale using H's Vishnu V. Zutshi BNL methodology. Discover refinements in Monte Carlo schematics and effective clustering techniques.
Photon Energy Calibration and Position Determination in E/M Scale Using H's Vishnu V. Zutshi BNL
E N D
Presentation Transcript
EM scale using h’s Vishnu V. Zutshi BNL
Preamble • gg decays • Important for absolute calibration • Non-linearity and offsets • Maybe possible with little or no trigger • Maybe possible with little or no tracking • Affords the possibility of refinement • Testing ground for Monte Carlo
Schematic • 2 peaks and a valley • EM3 is your best chance here • Neighbourhood definition • You may or may not want to extend the EM3 clustering to other floors • CellNN does extend it to other floors
CellNN • Each local maxima starts a floor cluster • An EM cell is defined to have 4 neighbours • Log weighting for position determination • Sharing based on a transverse parameterization of the shower • Angular matching between floor clusters • Position measurement is key
5 GeV h’s Asym=abs(e1-e2)/(e1+e2)
5 GeV h’s uncorrected corrected
5 GeV h’s + E corr. + Asym. cut
Lower Fcluster threshold 5 GeV h’s
Lower Fcluster threshold 5 GeV h’s
10 GeV h’s Energy matching E/Egen
10 GeV h’s uncorrected corrected E/Egen
10 GeV h’s deltaR=sqrt(df2+dh2)
Lower Fcluster threshold 5 GeV h’s
10 GeV h’s Position determined from ly3 if emfr>0.2
10 GeV h’s Ly3frac>0.2 and new W0’s
Ongoing… • W0’s for Fclustering • Energy corrections • Fthreshold • Neighbourhood • Sharing • Symmetric mass