1 / 33

Special Education State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report

Special Education State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report. Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009. SPP/APR: Overview. State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report.

tarak
Download Presentation

Special Education State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Special EducationState Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009

  2. SPP/APR: Overview

  3. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report IDEA 2004 requires each State to develop a six-year performance plan (2005-2010). • The State Performance Plan (SPP) evaluates the State’s efforts to implement the requirements and purposes of IDEA and illustrates how the State will continuously improve upon this implementation. • States will submit on an annual basis to the USDE Office of Special Education Programs an annual performance report (APR) and report publicly the performance of districts against the targets in the APR • Performance on compliance indicators used in LEA Determinations For more information on this subject, visit the TEA Website at:http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/special.ed/spp/index.html

  4. SPP/APR IN for FFY 2008 APR due Feb 2010 Indicator 1: Graduation Indicator 2: Dropout Indicator 3A-C: Adequate Yearly Progress Indicator 4A: Suspension/Expulsion Indicator 5: LRE, 6-21 Indicator 7: Early Childhood Outcomes Indicator 8: Parent Participation Indicator 9/10: Disproportionate Representation Indicator 11: Timely Initial Evaluation Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition

  5. SPP/APR Out for FFY 2008 APR due Feb 2010 Indicator 4B: Suspension/Expulsion (Race/Ethnicity) Indicator 6: LRE, 3-5 Indicator 13: Secondary Transition Indicator 14: Post School Outcomes

  6. SPP/APR:Looking Forward

  7. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Must use graduation rate calculation established by USDE under Title 1 of the ESEA, as reported to the Department of Education under Title 1. • Must use annual graduation rate targets under Title 1 of the ESEA FFY 2008 (2008-09) due Feb 2010 Indicator 1: % graduating with a regular diploma Note: Title 1 adjusted cohort graduation rate goes into effect in 2010-11 No change in PEIMS data collection Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010

  8. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Must use the dropout data used in the ESEA graduation rate calculation, as reported to the Department of Education under Title 1. Indicator 2: % dropping out of high school Note: Title 1 adjusted cohort graduation rate goes into effect in 2010-11 No change in PEIMS data collection Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010

  9. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Meet State’s AYP Targets • Participation Rate • Proficiency Rate Indicator 3: Participation and Proficiency on statewide assessments No change in assessment data collection Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010

  10. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report Change to methodology on determining a ‘significant discrepancy’ in the rate of suspension and expulsion of greater than 10 days in a school year for children with IEPs. Indicator 4A: Rate of Suspension and Expulsion No change in PEIMS data collection Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010

  11. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report Indicator 4B: Rate of Suspension and Expulsion (by Race/Ethnicity) No change in PEIMS data collectionNo APR reporting in Feb 2010 Report in FFY 2009 SPP due Feb 1, 2011

  12. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Inside the regular class 80% or more of the day; • Inside the regular class less than 40% of the day; and • In separate schools, residential facilities, or homebound/ hospital placements. Indicator 5: % of children with IEPs aged 6-21 served: No change in PEIMS data collection Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010

  13. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Regular early childhood program and receiving the majority of special education and related services in the regular early childhood program; and • Separate special education class, separate school or residential facility. Indicator 6: % of children with IEPs aged 3-5 attending: No change in PEIMS data collection (yet)No APR reporting in 2010 Report in FFY 2009 SPP due Feb 1, 2011

  14. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships) • Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy); and • Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs. Indicator 7: % of preschool children with IEPs aged 3-5 who demonstrate: No change in SPP7 data collection Report Baseline and Targets inFFY 2008 SPP due Feb 1, 2010

  15. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Increased number of surveys distributed • Public reporting on district performance Indicator 8: % of parents who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for students with disabilities. No change in SPP8 data collection process for 2008-09 Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010

  16. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report COMPLIANCE INDICATORS

  17. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Change in methodology for identifying overand under representation • Required review of policies, procedures and practices (self assessment) • Implement new race/ethn. reporting req. by 2010-11 Indicator 9: % of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. No change in PEIMS data collection Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010

  18. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Change in methodology for identifying overand under representation • Required review of policies, procedures and practices (self assessment) • Implement new race/ethn. reporting req. by 2010-11 Indicator 10: % of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification. No change in PEIMS data collection Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010

  19. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Indicator change • Potential changes to the data collection procedures for 2009-10 • Noncompliance correction ASAPBNLTOY Indicator 11: % of children who were evaluated within 60 days of receiving parental consent for initial evaluation or, if the State establishes a timeframe within which the evaluation must be conducted, within that timeline. No change in SPP11 data collection for 2008-09 Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010

  20. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Noncompliance correction ASAPBNLTOY Indicator 12: % of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays. No change in SPP12 data collection for 2008-09 Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010

  21. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report Indicator 13: % of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals. OLD INDICATOR

  22. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report NEW INDICATOR

  23. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report Indicator 13: % of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to student’s transition services needs. There also must be evidence that the student was invited to the IEP Team meeting where transition services are to be discussed and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP Team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached the age of majority.

  24. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • District will submit data, State will not report it • Noncompliance correction ASAPBNLTOY! Indicator 13: % of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals. No change in SPP13 data collection for 2008-09No APR Reporting in 2010 Report in FFY 2009 APR due Feb 1, 2011

  25. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school. • Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school. • Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school. Indicator 14: % of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were: No change in SPP14 data collection process for 2008-09No APR Reporting in 2010 Report in FFY 2009 SPP due Feb 1, 2011

  26. Disproportionate Representation

  27. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report Indicator 9: % of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Indicator 10: % of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.

  28. State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report • Indicators 9 and 10 are Compliance Indicators • Analysis identifies over and under representation for the reporting year • No Comparisons of Race/Ethnicity Categories/ Use of Minimum “N” Size • Required review of policies, procedures and practices (self assessment) • Implement new race/ethn. reporting req. by 2010-11 Report in FFY 2008 APR due Feb 1, 2010

  29. LEA Determination Levels

  30. LEA Determinations/ 2009 Determination Criteria 1. State Performance Plan (SPP) Compliance (SPP 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13) 2. Valid, Reliable, and Timely Data 3. Status of Uncorrected Noncompliance 4. Financial Audits 5. Program Effectiveness (PBMAS Results) http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/special.ed/spp/09determin.pdf

  31. Determination Level Ratings

  32. For more information, please contact: Sherry Marsh Education Service Center, Region 20 sherry.marsh@esc20.net 210-370-5411

More Related