slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
11 th Edition Chapter 10

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 93

11 th Edition Chapter 10 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 59 Views
  • Uploaded on

11 th Edition Chapter 10. Standard Costs and the Balanced Scorecard. Chapter Ten. Standard Costs. Standards are benchmarks or “norms” for measuring performance. Two types of standards are commonly used.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '11 th Edition Chapter 10' - tara-pickett


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
standard costs
Standard Costs

Standards are benchmarks or “norms”for measuring performance. Two typesof standards are commonly used.

Quantity standardsspecify how much of aninput should be used tomake a product orprovide a service.

Cost (price)standards specify how much should be paid for each unitof the input.

standard costs1

Deviations from standard deemed significantare brought to the attention of management, apractice known as management by exception.

Standard Costs

Standard

Amount

DirectMaterial

DirectLabor

ManufacturingOverhead

Type of Product Cost

variance analysis cycle

Exh.

10-1

Takecorrective actions

Identifyquestions

Receive explanations

Conduct next period’s operations

Analyze variances

Variance Analysis Cycle

Prepare standard cost performance report

Begin

setting standard costs
Setting Standard Costs

Accountants, engineers, purchasingagents, and production managerscombine efforts to set standards that encourage efficient future production.

setting standard costs1

I recommend using practical standards that are currently attainable with reasonable and efficient effort.

Should we useideal standards that require employees towork at 100 percent peak efficiency?

Setting Standard Costs

Engineer

ManagerialAccountant

setting direct material standards

QuantityStandards

Final, deliveredcost of materials,net of discounts.

Summarized in a Bill of Materials.

Setting Direct Material Standards

PriceStandards

setting standards
Setting Standards

In recent years, TQM advocates have soughtto eliminate all defects and waste, rather than continually build them into standards.

As a result allowances for waste andspoilage that are built into standardsshould be reduced over time.

setting direct labor standards

RateStandards

TimeStandards

Often a singlerate is used that reflectsthe mix of wages earned.

Use time and motion studies foreach labor operation.

Setting Direct Labor Standards
setting variable overhead standards

RateStandards

ActivityStandards

The rate is the variable portion of the predetermined overhead rate.

The activity is the base used to calculate the predetermined overhead.

Setting Variable Overhead Standards
standard cost card variable production cost
Standard Cost Card – Variable Production Cost

A standard cost card for one unit of product might look like this:

standards vs budgets

Astandardis a per unit cost.

  • Standards are often used when preparing budgets.
Standards vs. Budgets

Are standards the same as budgets?

A budget is set for total costs.

price and quantity standards

The purchasing manager is responsible for raw material purchase prices and the production manager is responsible for the quantity of raw material used.

  • The buying and using activities occur at different times. Raw material purchases may be held in inventory for a period of time before being used in production.
Price and Quantity Standards

Price and and quantity standards are determined separately for two reasons:

a general model for variance analysis

Price Variance

Quantity Variance

Difference betweenactual price and standard price

Difference betweenactual quantity andstandard quantity

A General Model for Variance Analysis

Variance Analysis

a general model for variance analysis1

Price Variance

Quantity Variance

Materials price varianceLabor rate varianceVOH spending variance

A General Model for Variance Analysis

Variance Analysis

Materials quantity variance

Labor efficiency variance

VOH efficiency variance

a general model for variance analysis2

Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price

Price Variance

Quantity Variance

A General Model for Variance Analysis
a general model for variance analysis3

Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity× × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price

Price Variance

Quantity Variance

Actual quantity is the amount of direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead actually used.

A General Model for Variance Analysis
a general model for variance analysis4

Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity× × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price

Price Variance

Quantity Variance

Standard quantity is the standard quantity allowed for the actual output for the period.

A General Model for Variance Analysis
a general model for variance analysis5

Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price

Price Variance

Quantity Variance

A General Model for Variance Analysis

Actual price is the amount actuallypaid for the for the input used.

a general model for variance analysis6

Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price

Price Variance

Quantity Variance

A General Model for Variance Analysis

Standard priceis the amount that should have been paid for the input used.

a general model for variance analysis7

Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price

Price Variance

Quantity Variance

A General Model for Variance Analysis

(AQ × AP) – (AQ × SP) (AQ × SP) – (SQ × SP)

AQ = Actual Quantity SP = Standard Price AP = Actual Price SQ = Standard Quantity

material variances example
Material Variances Example

Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following direct material standard for the fiberfill in its mountain parka.

0.1 kg. of fiberfill per parka at $5.00 per kg.

Last month 210 kgs of fiberfill were purchased and used to make 2,000 parkas. The material cost a total of $1,029.

material variances summary

Price variance$21 favorable

Quantity variance$50 unfavorable

Material Variances Summary

Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price

210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200 kgs. × × × $4.90 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg.

= $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000

material variances summary1

$1,029  210 kgs = $4.90 per kg

Material Variances Summary

Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price

210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200 kgs. × × × $4.90 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg.

= $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000

Price variance$21 favorable

Quantity variance$50 unfavorable

material variances summary2

0.1 kg per parka  2,000 parkas = 200 kgs

Material Variances Summary

Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price

210 kgs. 210 kgs. 200 kgs. × × × $4.90 per kg. $5.00 per kg. $5.00 per kg.

= $1,029 = $1,050 = $1,000

Price variance$21 favorable

Quantity variance$50 unfavorable

material variances using the factored equations
Material Variances:Using the Factored Equations

Materials price variance

MPV = AQ (AP - SP)

= 210 kgs ($4.90/kg - $5.00/kg)

= 210 kgs (-$0.10/kg)

= $21 F

Materials quantity variance

MQV = SP (AQ - SQ)

= $5.00/kg (210 kgs-(0.1 kg/parka 2,000 parkas))

= $5.00/kg (210 kgs - 200 kgs)

= $5.00/kg (10 kgs)

= $50 U

isolation of material variances

I’ll start computingthe price variancewhen material ispurchased rather thanwhen it’s used.

I need the price variancesooner so that I can betteridentify purchasing problems.

You accountants just don’tunderstand the problems thatpurchasing managers have.

Isolation of Material Variances
material variances

The price variance is computed on the entire quantitypurchased.

  • The quantity variance is computed only on the quantityused.
Material Variances

Hanson purchased and used 1,700 pounds. How are the variances computed if the amount purchaseddiffers from the amount used?

slide30

Purchasing Manager

Production Manager

Responsibility for Material Variances

Materials Quantity Variance

Materials Price Variance

The standard price is used to compute the quantity varianceso that the production manager is not held responsible forthe purchasing manager’s performance.

slide31

Your poor scheduling sometimes requires me to rush order material at a higher price, causing unfavorable price variances.

I am not responsible for this unfavorable materialquantity variance.

You purchased cheapmaterial, so my peoplehad to use more of it.

Responsibility for Material Variances

quick check

Zippy

Quick Check 

Hanson Inc. has the following direct material standard to manufacture one Zippy:

1.5 pounds per Zippy at $4.00 per pound

Last week 1,700 pounds of material were purchased and used to make 1,000 Zippies. The material cost a total of $6,630.

quick check1

Zippy

Quick Check 

Hanson’s material price variance (MPV)for the week was:

a. $170 unfavorable.

b. $170 favorable.

c. $800 unfavorable.

d. $800 favorable.

quick check2

Zippy

MPV = AQ(AP - SP) MPV = 1,700 lbs. × ($3.90 - 4.00) MPV = $170 Favorable

Quick Check 

Hanson’s material price variance (MPV)for the week was:

a. $170 unfavorable.

b. $170 favorable.

c. $800 unfavorable.

d. $800 favorable.

quick check3

Zippy

Quick Check 

Hanson’s material quantity variance (MQV)for the week was:

a. $170 unfavorable.

b. $170 favorable.

c. $800 unfavorable.

d. $800 favorable.

quick check4

Zippy

MQV = SP(AQ - SQ) MQV = $4.00(1,700 lbs - 1,500 lbs) MQV = $800 unfavorable

Quick Check 

Hanson’s material quantity variance (MQV)for the week was:

a. $170 unfavorable.

b. $170 favorable.

c. $800 unfavorable.

d. $800 favorable.

quick check5

Zippy

Price variance$170 favorable

Quantity variance$800 unfavorable

Quick Check 

Actual Quantity Actual Quantity Standard Quantity × × × Actual Price Standard Price Standard Price

1,700 lbs. 1,700 lbs. 1,500 lbs. × × × $3.90 per lb. $4.00 per lb. $4.00 per lb.

= $6,630 = $ 6,800 = $6,000

quick check continued

Zippy

Quick Check  Continued

Hanson Inc. has the following material standard to manufacture one Zippy:

1.5 pounds per Zippy at $4.00 per pound

Last week 2,800 pounds of material were purchased at a total cost of $10,920, and 1,700 pounds were used to make 1,000 Zippies.

quick check continued1

Zippy

Price variance increases because quantity purchased increases.

Price variance$280 favorable

Quick Check  Continued

Actual Quantity Actual QuantityPurchased Purchased× ×Actual Price Standard Price

2,800 lbs. 2,800 lbs. × × $3.90 per lb. $4.00 per lb.

= $10,920 = $11,200

quick check continued2

Zippy

Quantity variance is unchanged because actual and standard quantities are unchanged.

Quantity variance$800 unfavorable

Quick Check  Continued

Actual QuantityUsed Standard Quantity × × Standard Price Standard Price

1,700 lbs. 1,500 lbs. × × $4.00 per lb. $4.00 per lb.

= $6,800 = $6,000

labor variances example
Labor Variances Example

Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following direct labor standard for its mountain parka.

1.2 standard hours per parka at $10.00 per hour

Last month employees actually worked 2,500 hours at a total labor cost of $26,250 to make 2,000 parkas.

labor variances summary

Rate variance$1,250 unfavorable

Efficiency variance$1,000 unfavorable

Labor Variances Summary

Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate

2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours × × ×$10.50 per hour $10.00 per hour. $10.00 per hour

= $26,250 = $25,000 = $24,000

labor variances summary1

$26,250  2,500 hours = $10.50 per hour

Rate variance$1,250 unfavorable

Efficiency variance$1,000 unfavorable

Labor Variances Summary

Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate

2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours × × ×$10.50 per hour $10.00 per hour. $10.00 per hour

= $26,250 = $25,000 = $24,000

labor variances summary2

1.2 hours per parka  2,000 parkas = 2,400 hours

Rate variance$1,250 unfavorable

Efficiency variance$1,000 unfavorable

Labor Variances Summary

Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate

2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours × × ×$10.50 per hour $10.00 per hour. $10.00 per hour

= $26,250 = $25,000 = $24,000

labor variances using the factored equations
Labor Variances:Using the Factored Equations

Labor rate variance

LRV = AH (AR - SR)

= 2,500 hours ($10.50 per hour – $10.00 per hour)

= 2,500 hours ($0.50 per hour)

= $1,250 unfavorable

Labor efficiency variance

LEV = SR (AH - SH)

= $10.00 per hour (2,500 hours – 2,400 hours)

= $10.00 per hour (100 hours)

= $1,000 unfavorable

responsibility for labor variances

Mix of skill levelsassigned to work tasks.

Level of employee motivation.

Quality of production supervision.

Production Manager

Quality of training provided to employees.

Responsibility for Labor Variances

Production managers areusually held accountablefor labor variancesbecause they caninfluence the:

responsibility for labor variances1

I think it took more time to process the materials because the Maintenance Department has poorly maintained your equipment.

I am not responsible for the unfavorable laborefficiency variance!

You purchased cheapmaterial, so it took moretime to process it.

Responsibility forLabor Variances
quick check6

Zippy

Quick Check 

Hanson Inc. has the following direct labor standard to manufacture one Zippy:

1.5 standard hours per Zippy at $12.00 perdirect labor hour

Last week 1,550 direct labor hours were worked at a total labor cost of $18,910to make 1,000 Zippies.

quick check7

Zippy

Quick Check 

Hanson’s labor rate variance (LRV) for the week was:

a. $310 unfavorable.

b. $310 favorable.

c. $300 unfavorable.

d. $300 favorable.

quick check8

Zippy

LRV = AH(AR - SR) LRV = 1,550 hrs($12.20 - $12.00) LRV = $310 unfavorable

Quick Check 

Hanson’s labor rate variance (LRV) for the week was:

a. $310 unfavorable.

b. $310 favorable.

c. $300 unfavorable.

d. $300 favorable.

quick check9

Zippy

Quick Check 

Hanson’s labor efficiency variance (LEV)for the week was:

a. $590 unfavorable.

b. $590 favorable.

c. $600 unfavorable.

d. $600 favorable.

quick check10

Zippy

LEV = SR(AH - SH) LEV = $12.00(1,550 hrs - 1,500 hrs) LEV = $600 unfavorable

Quick Check 

Hanson’s labor efficiency variance (LEV)for the week was:

a. $590 unfavorable.

b. $590 favorable.

c. $600 unfavorable.

d. $600 favorable.

quick check11

Zippy

Rate variance$310 unfavorable

Efficiency variance$600 unfavorable

Quick Check 

Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate

1,550 hours 1,550 hours 1,500 hours × × × $12.20 per hour $12.00 per hour $12.00 per hour

= $18,910 = $18,600 = $18,000

variable manufacturing overhead variances example
Variable Manufacturing Overhead Variances Example

Glacier Peak Outfitters has the following direct variable manufacturing overhead labor standard for its mountain parka.

1.2 standard hours per parka at $4.00 per hour

Last month employees actually worked 2,500 hours to make 2,000 parkas. Actual variable manufacturing overhead for the month was $10,500.

variable manufacturing overhead variances summary

Spending variance$500 unfavorable

Efficiency variance$400 unfavorable

Variable Manufacturing Overhead Variances Summary

Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate

2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours × × × $4.20 per hour $4.00 per hour $4.00 per hour

= $10,500 = $10,000 = $9,600

variable manufacturing overhead variances summary1

$10,500  2,500 hours = $4.20 per hour

Spending variance$500 unfavorable

Efficiency variance$400 unfavorable

Variable Manufacturing Overhead Variances Summary

Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate

2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours × × × $4.20 per hour $4.00 per hour $4.00 per hour

= $10,500 = $10,000 = $9,600

variable manufacturing overhead variances summary2

1.2 hours per parka  2,000 parkas = 2,400 hours

Spending variance$500 unfavorable

Efficiency variance$400 unfavorable

Variable Manufacturing Overhead Variances Summary

Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate

2,500 hours 2,500 hours 2,400 hours × × × $4.20 per hour $4.00 per hour $4.00 per hour

= $10,500 = $10,000 = $9,600

variable manufacturing overhead variances using factored equations
Variable Manufacturing Overhead Variances: Using Factored Equations

Variable manufacturing overhead spending variance

VMSV = AH (AR - SR)

= 2,500 hours ($4.20 per hour – $4.00 per hour)

= 2,500 hours ($0.20 per hour)

= $500 unfavorable

Variable manufacturing overhead efficiency variance

VMEV = SR (AH - SH)

= $4.00 per hour (2,500 hours – 2,400 hours)

= $4.00 per hour (100 hours)

= $400 unfavorable

quick check12

Zippy

Quick Check 

Hanson Inc. has the following variable manufacturing overhead standard tomanufacture one Zippy:

1.5 standard hours per Zippy at $3.00 perdirect labor hour

Last week 1,550 hours were worked to make 1,000 Zippies, and $5,115 was spent forvariable manufacturing overhead.

quick check13

Zippy

Quick Check 

Hanson’s spending variance (VOSV) for variable manufacturing overhead forthe week was:

a. $465 unfavorable.

b. $400 favorable.

c. $335 unfavorable.

d. $300 favorable.

quick check14

Zippy

VOSV = AH(AR - SR) VOSV = 1,550 hrs($3.30 - $3.00) VOSV = $465 unfavorable

Quick Check 

Hanson’s spending variance (VOSV) for variable manufacturing overhead forthe week was:

a. $465 unfavorable.

b. $400 favorable.

c. $335 unfavorable.

d. $300 favorable.

quick check15

Zippy

Quick Check 

Hanson’s efficiency variance (VOEV) for variable manufacturing overhead for the week was:

a. $435 unfavorable.

b. $435 favorable.

c. $150 unfavorable.

d. $150 favorable.

quick check16

Zippy

1,000 units × 1.5 hrs per unit

VOEV = SR(AH - SH) VOEV = $3.00(1,550 hrs - 1,500 hrs) VOEV = $150 unfavorable

Quick Check 

Hanson’s efficiency variance (VOEV) for variable manufacturing overhead for the week was:

a. $435 unfavorable.

b. $435 favorable.

c. $150 unfavorable.

d. $150 favorable.

quick check17

Zippy

Spending variance$465 unfavorable

Efficiency variance$150 unfavorable

Quick Check 

Actual Hours Actual Hours Standard Hours × × × Actual Rate Standard Rate Standard Rate

1,550 hours 1,550 hours 1,500 hours × × × $3.30 per hour $3.00 per hour $3.00 per hour

= $5,115 = $4,650 = $4,500

variance analysis and management by exception

Larger variances, in dollar amount or as a percentage of the standard, are investigated first.

Variance Analysis andManagement by Exception

How do I knowwhich variances to investigate?

a statistical control chart

Exh.

10-9

A Statistical Control Chart

Warning signals for investigation

Favorable Limit

Desired Value

Unfavorable Limit

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Variance Measurements

advantages of standard costs

Advantages

Advantages of Standard Costs

Promotes economy and efficiency

Management byexception

Enhances responsibilityaccounting

Simplifiedbookkeeping

potential problems with standard costs

PotentialProblems

Potential Problems with Standard Costs

Emphasizing standardsmay exclude otherimportant objectives.

Favorablevariances maybe misinterpreted.

Standard costreports maynot be timely.

Emphasis onnegative mayimpact morale.

Continuous improvement maybe more importantthan meeting standards.

Invalid assumptionsabout the relationshipbetween laborcost and output.

the balanced scorecard

Customers

Financial

Learningand growth

Internalbusinessprocesses

The Balanced Scorecard

Management translates its strategy into performance measures that employees understand and accept.

Performancemeasures

the balanced scorecard from strategy to performance measures

Exh.

10-11

The Balanced Scorecard: FromStrategy to Performance Measures

Performance Measures

Financial

Has our financialperformance improved?

What are ourfinancial goals?

What customers dowe want to serve andhow are we going towin and retain them?

Vision and Strategy

Customer

Do customers recognize thatwe are delivering more value?

What internal busi-ness processes arecritical to providingvalue to customers?

Internal Business Processes

Have we improved key business processes so that we can deliver more value to customers?

Learning and Growth

Are we maintaining our abilityto change and improve?

the balanced scorecard non financial measures

Financial measures are lag indicators that summarize the results of past actions. Non-financial measures are leading indicators of future financial performance.

  • Top managers are ordinarily responsible for financial performance measures – not lower level managers. Non-financial measures are more likely to be understood and controlled by lower level managers.
The Balanced Scorecard:Non-financial Measures

The balanced scorecard relies on non-financial measures in addition to financial measures for two reasons:

the balanced scorecard for individuals
The Balanced Scorecard for Individuals

The entire organization should have an overall balanced scorecard.

Each individual should have a personal balanced scorecard.

A personal scorecard should contain measures that can beinfluenced by the individual being evaluated and thatsupport the measures in the overall balanced scorecard.

the balanced scorecard1

Then

The Balanced Scorecard

A balanced scorecard should have measuresthat are linked together on a cause-and-effect basis.

If we improveone performancemeasure . . .

Another desiredperformance measurewill improve.

The balanced scorecard lays out concrete actions to attain desired outcomes.

the balanced scorecard and compensation
The Balanced Scorecardand Compensation

Incentive compensation should be linked to balanced scorecard performance measures.

the balanced scorecard jaguar example

Exh.

10-13

Financial

Customer

Internal Business Processes

Learningand Growth

The Balanced ScorecardJaguar Example

Profit

Contribution per car

Number of cars sold

Customer satisfactionwith options

Number ofoptions available

Time toinstall option

Employee skills in installing options

the balanced scorecard jaguar example1

Satisfaction Increases

Increase Options

TimeDecreases

Increase Skills

The Balanced ScorecardJaguar Example

Profit

Contribution per car

Number of cars sold

Results

Customer satisfactionwith options

Strategies

Number ofoptions available

Time toinstall option

Employee skills in installing options

the balanced scorecard jaguar example2

Cars sold Increase

Satisfaction Increases

Increase Options

The Balanced ScorecardJaguar Example

Profit

Contribution per car

Results

Number of cars sold

Customer satisfactionwith options

Strategies

Number ofoptions available

Time toinstall option

Employee skills in installing options

the balanced scorecard jaguar example3

ContributionIncreases

TimeDecreases

Increase Skills

The Balanced ScorecardJaguar Example

Results

Profit

Contribution per car

Number of cars sold

Customer satisfactionwith options

Number ofoptions available

Time toinstall option

Strategies

Employee skills in installing options

the balanced scorecard jaguar example4

ProfitsIncrease

ContributionIncreases

Satisfaction Increases

Increase Options

TimeDecreases

Increase Skills

The Balanced ScorecardJaguar Example

Results

Profit

If numberof cars soldand contributionper car increase,profits increase.

Contribution per car

Number of cars sold

Customer satisfactionwith options

Strategies

Number ofoptions available

Time toinstall option

Employee skills in installing options

advantages of graphic feedback
Advantages of Graphic Feedback

When interpreting its performance, Jaguar will look forcontinual improvement. It is easier to spot trends or unusual performance if this data is presented graphically.

delivery performance measures

Order Received

Goods Shipped

ProductionStarted

Throughput Time

Delivery Cycle Time

Delivery Performance Measures

Process Time + Inspection Time+ Move Time + Queue Time

Wait Time

Process time is the only value-added time.

delivery performance measures1

Order Received

Goods Shipped

ProductionStarted

Throughput Time

Delivery Cycle Time

Manufacturing

Cycle

Efficiency

Value-added timeManufacturing cycle time

=

Delivery Performance Measures

Process Time + Inspection Time+ Move Time + Queue Time

Wait Time

quick check18
Quick Check 

A TQM team at Narton Corp has recorded the following average times for production:

Wait 3.0 days Move 0.5 days

Inspection 0.4 days Queue 9.3 days

Process 0.2 days

What is the throughput time?

a. 10.4 days

b. 0.2 days

c. 4.1 days

d. 13.4 days

quick check19
Quick Check 

A TQM team at Narton Corp has recorded the following average times for production:

Wait 3.0 days Move 0.5 days

Inspection 0.4 days Queue 9.3 days

Process 0.2 days

What is the throughput time?

a. 10.4 days

b. 0.2 days

c. 4.1 days

d. 13.4 days

Throughput time = Process + Inspection + Move + Queue

= 0.2 days + 0.4 days + 0.5 days + 9.3 days

= 10.4 days

quick check20
Quick Check 

A TQM team at Narton Corp has recorded the following average times for production:

Wait 3.0 days Move 0.5 days

Inspection 0.4 days Queue 9.3 days

Process 0.2 days

What is the MCE?

a. 50.0%

b. 1.9%

c. 52.0%

d. 5.1%

quick check21
Quick Check 

A TQM team at Narton Corp has recorded the following average times for production:

Wait 3.0 days Move 0.5 days

Inspection 0.4 days Queue 9.3 days

Process 0.2 days

What is the MCE?

a. 50.0%

b. 1.9%

c. 52.0%

d. 5.1%

MCE = Value-added time ÷ Throughput time

= Process time ÷ Throughput time

= 0.2 days ÷ 10.4 days

= 1.9%

quick check22
Quick Check 

A TQM team at Narton Corp has recorded the following average times for production:

Wait 3.0 days Move 0.5 days

Inspection 0.4 days Queue 9.3 days

Process 0.2 days

What is the delivery cycle time?

a. 0.5 days

b. 0.7 days

c. 13.4 days

d. 10.4 days

quick check23
Quick Check 

Delivery cycle time = Wait time + Throughput time

= 3.0 days + 10.4 days

= 13.4 days

A TQM team at Narton Corp has recorded the following average times for production:

Wait 3.0 days Move 0.5 days

Inspection 0.4 days Queue 9.3 days

Process 0.2 days

What is the delivery cycle time?

a. 0.5 days

b. 0.7 days

c. 13.4 days

d. 10.4 days

appendix 10a journal entries to record variances
Appendix 10AJournal Entries to Record Variances

We will use information form the Glacier Peak Outfittersexample earlier in the chapter to illustrate journal entriesfor standard cost variances. Recall the following:

Material

AQ × AP = $1,029AQ × SP = $1,050SQ × SP = $1,000MPV = $21 FMQV = $50 U

Labor

AH × AR = $26,250AH × SR = $25,000SH × SR = $24,000LRV = $1,250 ULEV = $1,000 U

Now let’s prepare the entries to recordthe labor and material variances.

appendix 10a journal entries to record variances2
Appendix 10AJournal Entries to Record Variances

Variable manufacturing overhead variances are usually notrecorded in the accounts separately, but are determined as part ofthe general analysis of overhead that is covered in the next chapter.

cost flows in a standard cost system
Cost Flows in a Standard Cost System
  • Inventories are recorded at standard cost.
  • Variances are recorded as follows:
    • Favorable variances are credits, representing savings in production costs.
    • Unfavorable variances are debits, representing excess production costs.
  • Standard cost variances are usually closed to cost of goods sold.
    • Favorable variances decrease cost of goods sold.
    • Unfavorable variances increase cost of goods sold.