a phased strategy for opening armenia s western border n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
A Phased Strategy for Opening Armenia’s Western Border PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
A Phased Strategy for Opening Armenia’s Western Border

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 28

A Phased Strategy for Opening Armenia’s Western Border - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 102 Views
  • Uploaded on

A Phased Strategy for Opening Armenia’s Western Border. Armenian International Policy Research Group Torosyan, Gagnidze, Beilock. Introduction. This study: outlines a plan to open Armenia’s borders with Turkey examines likely changes in trade flows between Armenia and Turkey

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

A Phased Strategy for Opening Armenia’s Western Border


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
a phased strategy for opening armenia s western border

A Phased Strategy for Opening Armenia’s Western Border

Armenian International Policy Research Group

Torosyan, Gagnidze, Beilock

introduction
Introduction

This study:

  • outlines a plan to open Armenia’s borders with Turkey
  • examines likely changes in trade flows between Armenia and Turkey
  • discusses how open border will affect other countries in and around the region, including: Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iran, and Russia
literature review
Literature review

Polyakov “Changing Trade Patterns after Conflict Resolution in South Caucasus”, 2001

  • uses a gravity model to estimate trade flows between Armenia and Turkey
  • estimates are overly optimistic: the overall effect on Armenian economy from border opening is calculated to be as much as 38% of the the size of GDP.
literature review1
Literature review

AEPLAC’s “Study of the Economic Impact on the Armenian Economy from Re-Opening of the Turkish-Armenian Borders”, 2005

  • estimates a gravity model of trade to calculate short and medium term effects of border opening. Uses CGE modeling to estimate longer term effects of border opening.
  • too conservative in estimates of potential economic effects of border opening.
current access to turkey
Current access to Turkey

Currently almost all overland trade between Armenia and Turkey takes place via Georgia.

There are two major border passages that are being used for Armenian trade with Turkey:

  • passage G1 - south of Batumi
  • passage G2 - south-west of Akhaltsikhe

An additional passage that is sometimes used is G3 south-west of Akhalkalaki.

No railroad between Georgia and Turkey.

strategies for opening the border
Strategies for Opening the Border

There are at least six potential border crossings by road and one rail connection between Armenia and Turkey.

Stage I: Opening two passages to handle initial traffic and test systems.

A1 – Metsamor

A2 – Gyumri

strategies for opening the border1
Strategies for Opening the Border

Stage II: As traffic volumes increase, both countries could set up additional border crossings. Options:

A3 - Margara village

A4 - Bagaran village

A5 - Haykadzor village

A6 - Paghakn village

looking at the region
Looking at the Region

What are some of the potential benefits of open borders to the following countries of the region?

  • Azerbaijan
  • Georgia
  • Iran, Gulf States
  • Armenia
  • Turkey
azerbaijan
Azerbaijan

The scenario around which the project has been developed is the opening of borders between Turkey and Armenia, but not between Azerbaijan and Armenia.

However, Turkey closed the border in support of Azerbaijan. Ending it without Azerbaijan’s acquiescence would be politically difficult, at best, and more likely impossible.

To have Azerbaijan’s consent, concessions favoring Azerbaijan could be negotiated.

armenia s potential as a transshipment corridor
Armenia’s Potential as aTransshipment Corridor
  • north-south routs through Armenia are both longer and more difficult than other routes
  • in an east-west direction, Armenia has considerable potential for transshipments: between Baku and Kars or Istanbul, routes through Armenia are as short as or shorter than alternative routings and have to negotiate fewer natural barriers (i.e. mountain ranges).
  • moreover, the only rail connection between the Caucasus and Turkey is through Armenia.
the georgian buffer
The Georgian Buffer

Our study assumes that full cessation of the closed border between Armenia and Azerbaijan (“mainland”) is impossible.

Fortunately, the main east-west rail line and roadway connect Armenia and Azerbaijan via Georgia => carriers and freight can transit between Armenia and Azerbaijan without crossing a common border.

transshipments via armenia
Transshipments via Armenia

With an open border between Armenia and Turkey, Turkish carriers would be free to transit Armenia, improving linkages between Azerbaijan and Turkey.

Armenia’s rail system also could carry transshipments of freight bound to or from Azerbaijan.

There would have to be

  • non-discriminatory treatment of cargoes
  • at or near cost level fees
access to nakhichevan
Access to Nakhichevan

Armenia could consider effecting a partial opening of the border with Nakhichevan. This might be conceived of as Stage III of a phased opening, giving better access to

  • South Armenia
  • Nakhichevan
  • Iran
georgia
Georgia

Because of the closed border, Georgia has had a virtual monopoly over surface freight movements to and from Armenia.

For many years Georgia levied surcharges on all freight to and from Armenia. Recently Georgian government has taken steps to lower transit fees for Armenian trade, and also to limit unofficial payments on the road.

Virtually all freight moving between the West and Azerbaijan uses Georgian roads or rails and its ports.

what s in for georgia
What’s in for Georgia?

Open borders between Armenia and Turkey may reduce the volumes and/or premiums for Georgia from Armenian transit traffic, but is unlikely to threaten transit trade to/from Azerbaijan going through Georgia.

If transit traffic through Nakhichevan were permitted, Georgian importers and exporters would benefit from improved access to Iran and the Gulf States.

Georgian importers and exporters would also benefit from improved road and rail access to some parts of Turkey.

increased competition in turkey
Increased Competition in Turkey?

There is a possibility of negative effects of export diversion for Georgia when Armenian-Turkish border opens. The magnitude of this effect would depend on how much overlap there might be between Georgian and Armenian exports to Turkey.

To determine the extent of that overlap we use export similarity technique, also known as Finger-Kreinin Index (FKI).The index ranges from 0 (no overlap) to 1 (complete overlap).

more compliments than substitutes
More Compliments than Substitutes

Armenian and Georgian export flows to the EU in 2004 did not have a big overlap: FKI is calculated to be 0.182=> Armenian and Georgian goods are not very close substitutes in European markets.

Products that do overlap either have a small share in overall exports in both countries, or are homogeneous in nature =>

Development of Armenia-Turkey trade will not have a very strong diversion effect onGeorgian exports to Turkey.

iran and the gulf states
Iran, and the Gulf States

Opening the border with Turkey will allow shortening of travel distances to

  • Iran (to Tabriz, by road)
  • Syria (to Aleppo, by road and rail)
  • Lebanon (to Beirut, by road and rail)
  • further to the south.

Railroad from Gyumri will allow convenient access to Greece (Thessaloniki) and other European counties.

russia
Russia?

Trade benefits from open border would be magnified if road and rail transits through Abkhazia were also restored.

estimating changes in regional trade pattern
Estimating Changes in Regional Trade Pattern

To assess potential trade flows between Armenia and Turkeya gravity modelis developed and estimated. Model features:

  • Countries: transition countries, developed European countries, Turkey, and Israel
  • Estimation: data for 1999 are used to estimate the model, data for 2004 are used to predict potential trade flows between Armenia and Turkey.
estimating changes in regional trade pattern1
Estimating Changes in Regional Trade Pattern

Our model explains 75-80% of total variation in trade for sample countries. Most of the coefficient estimates are highly significant and are in line withexpectations.

To check the robustness of our results we estimate Armenia-Turkey trade volumes for 2004 and compare them with actual data:

Estimated Actual

Imports from Turkey $33,887,690 $37,498,051Exports to Turkey $3,918,173 $1,200,233

results open border effect
Results: Open Border Effect

After obtaining gravity model estimates we calculate the increase in trade that will result from border opening

  • estimated volume of Armenian imports from Turkey is $51,041,170, some 50% higher than with closed border
  • estimated volume of Armenian exports to Turkey is $5,404,574 which corresponds to 38% increase in exports
results reduced distance effect
Results: Reduced Distance Effect

If we adjust distance as well to reflect shorter travel time increase in trade volume is likely to be even higher:

  • each 10% of reduction in distance will lead to 15.6% increase in imports from Turkey
  • each 10% of reduction in distance will lead to 12.6% increase in exports to Turkey
results gdp growth
Results: GDP Growth

Our estimates are for 2004 levels of GDP and GDP per capita. However, due to

  • High rates of GDP growth in Armenia
  • Turkey’s emphasis on increasing GDP

we are likely to observe a further expansion in Armenia-Turkey trade relations.

GDP growth rates in 2005 were 5.6% in Turkey and 13.9% in Armenia. This would increase our exports estimates to Turkey by 23.8% ($1.3 mln.), while imports from Turkey would be 20.8% higher ($14 mln.)

results
Results

In addition, we should take into consideration the fact that with open border there will be railroad connection between Armenia and Turkey, which is not reflected in our model. Hence, there is another important factor that will influence trade volumes between our two countries.