180 likes | 259 Views
This compelling work by Jane Bambauer and the James E. Rogers College of Law at the University of Arizona highlights the risks and challenges associated with the deidentification of data held in common databases. The text explores the flaws in current anonymization practices and emphasizes the need for transparency and restricted access to prevent reidentification of individuals. The authors advocate for rewriting privacy laws and promoting data protection to safeguard against misuse and privacy breaches. Through real-life examples and statistical analysis, the book underscores the critical importance of preserving the integrity of shared data resources.
E N D
Tragedy of theDeidentified Data CommonsAn Appeal for Transparency and Access Jane Bambauer James E. Rogers College of LawUniversity of Arizona
The Data Commons Information collected by the government tax information, epidemiological data, census surveys, educational records, home mortgage data Information collected by private companies Anonymized and released*
The Anonymization Problem • Research subjects can be reidentified in anonymized databases “with astonishing ease.” AOL Re-identification of Gov. Weld Netflix re-identification • Every privacy law must be rewritten to eliminate dependence on anonymization and to restrict access to all data (even deidentified data) without consent Paul Ohm, Broken Promises of Privacy 57 UCLA L. REV. 1701
Save the Data Commons The Data Commons has been used to: • Detect housing and employment discrimination • Debunk the myth of the “welfare queen” • Inform the healthcare and mortgage lending policy debates • Correct longstanding misconceptions about crime and law enforcement • Lots more… Jane Yakowitz, Tragedy of the Data Commons
Gov. Weld Reidentification Latanya Sweeney Collected Gov. Weld’s voter registration information and publicly available hospital data Only one hospital patient matched Gov. Weld’s DOB, zip, and gender Conclusion from analysis of US Census data: 87% can be uniquely identified from DOB, zip, and gender Golle recalculations: 63% are unique using DOB, zip, and gender
Daniel Barth-Jones, “Reidentification” of Governor William Weld
Sweeney et al. 2013 PGP Study 579 Personal Genome Project participants provided their DOB, zip code, and gender Using voter registration records and other commercial data sources, Sweeney et al. were able to reidentify 28%(accuracy unclear)
2009 ONC Study Out of 15,000 HIPAA-compliant records, 2 could be reidentified .013% Chance of Reidentification For comparison’s sake, chance of dying from an auto accident this year: .017%
If I Were a Malicious Intruder… 3,101 reported data breaches in the U.S. (about half a billion records) 700 reported breaches of health records
If I Were a Malicious Intruder… Sift through Garbage Make Inferences from Facebook Profiles Swab a Coffee Cup
What We Have to Lose • Fewer Opportunities for Replication • Fewer Voluntary Research Databases • Fewer Involuntary Public Databases • Increased Regulatory Precautions More Status Quo Bias
Vioxx “What If” Study From Richard Platt’s FDA testimony in 2007 Vioxx approved May, 1999 Removed from market September, 2004 (64 months) Data on 7 million patients: 34 months Data on 100 million: 3 months 88,000-139,000 avoidable heart attacks 27,000-55,000 avoidable deaths