1 / 20

The Kansas DMIE: Implications for Health Reform

NASMD Annual Conference November 9, 2010 Washington, DC. The Kansas DMIE: Implications for Health Reform. Jean P. Hall and Janice Moore University of Kansas. Background. Approximately 200,000 people are enrolled in 35 state high-risk pools nationally

tahlia
Download Presentation

The Kansas DMIE: Implications for Health Reform

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NASMD Annual Conference November 9, 2010 Washington, DC The Kansas DMIE: Implications for Health Reform Jean P. Hall and Janice Moore University of Kansas

  2. Background • Approximately 200,000 people are enrolled in 35 state high-risk pools nationally • Individuals are uninsurable in the private market due to pre-existing conditions • Health reform legislation created a temporary national high-risk pool, called the Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) beginning in July 2010 and running through December 31, 2013

  3. Current State High-Risk Pool Plans • Steep premiums that increase with age; range from 125 to 200% of individual market rates for the state • High levels of deductibles and co-insurance; similar to other individual policies • Limits on some benefits, such as preventive services, prescriptions, and mental health • In Kansas, no coverage for adult immunizations, dental, vision, hearing, contraception, or obesity treatment

  4. The Kansas Demonstration to Maintain Independence & Employment • Randomized controlled study funded by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services • Tested the hypothesis that provision of comprehensive benefits to HRP enrollees could prevent or forestall disability • Kansas HRP participants historically transition to SSDI at a rate 8 times that of the general population • Intervention provided Medicaid-like services as wraparound, with enhanced benefits and greatly reduced out-of-pocket costs

  5. Methods • Kansas Risk Pool participants ages 18 to 60, working ≥40 hours per month, with a potentially disabling condition • 416 individuals in three cohorts • Six baseline focus groups with total n=42 (10% sample, self-selected) • Telephone surveys with entire sample assessing health status, work efforts, medical debt, experiences with risk pool • Analysis of claims data

  6. Participant demographics • 50% male • 99% white • 50.6 years mean age • 71% are self-employed • 45% work <40 hours/week • $49,970 average individual income • 80% had some college; 45% have a four-year degree or higher • 29% report medical debt

  7. Claims and Survey Data Findings: Co-morbidities* * Based on baseline claims and self-report

  8. Focus Group Findings: 3 Themes • High premiums and deductibles limit ability to afford even basic services • Prescription costs are particularly problematic and compliance is poor • Delay or forfeit strategies increase stress and diminish health and quality of life

  9. High Premiums and Deductibles • Choose higher deductibles to obtain affordable premiums (more than half >$2500) • Delay or forgo care including diagnostic, preventive, and treatment • “Save up” visits and surgeries until they meet deductible • Stop care at start of calendar year

  10. Prescriptions • Use free samples, generics, double-dose whenever possible • Refuse, delay, reduce dosage, skip doses or use drugs no longer prescribed • “I cut my insulin in half.” • “Now that I’ve gotten the lower premiums and can afford the medication, I take the pills every day exactly like they’re written on the prescription bottle and check my sugar three times a day like I’m supposed to because even the little box of strips can cost $85 a box.”

  11. Increased stress • “If somebody says you ought to do this [medical test] and you’re saying I don’t think I can because I can’t afford it… and then you go home at night and say ‘did I do the right thing?’ That eats on people.” • “You’re going ‘is this other pain something I should have gotten tested?’ I couldn’t afford it, but you know you worry.” [from a breast cancer survivor]

  12. Many are underinsured • 53% have deductibles > 5% of family income • 38% have out-of-pocket expenses >10% of family income for self & family • 72% have one or more of these indicators of underinsurance • With a deductible of $2500, people with an annual income less than $50,000 are considered underinsured

  13. Discussion and Implications • Most in the study were well-educated and middle class; they knew they needed services and medications but could not afford them • Underinsurance may be as big a barrier to access as uninsurance, especially for people with chronic conditions • When provided DMIE benefits and relieved of cost burdens, participants increased use of medically appropriate services and had better outcomes

  14. Service Utilization *Intervention group utilization significantly different from control at p<.001

  15. PMPM costs Average total annual allowed costs: Control Group: $10,560 Intervention Group: $13,932 *Significantly higher, p<.001

  16. DMIE Health Status Outcomes

  17. The PCIPs • Coverage level is similar to that of Bronze coverage in the Exchange • Premiums are less than in many state high-risk pool plans, but participants are still likely to be underinsured • PCIP eligibility requires being uninsured for 6 months prior to enrollment; some enrollees will have pent-up need

  18. Implications for Health Reform • People with chronic conditions or disabilities who are self-employed or do not qualify for employer-sponsored health care will likely acquire insurance through the Exchange. • If the Exchange expands coverage primarily through plans with high cost-sharing, the benefits of coverage may be muted. • Participant experiences with the PCIPs may provide insights into possible improvements for Exchange coverage.

  19. Example from the Exchange • Individual age 50 and income at 435% of poverty level ($50,000)and $10,500 in medical costs: • Annual premiums=$6978* (14% of income) • Annual out of pocket = $4,900 (9.6% of income) assuming $2500 deductible and 30% co-insurance** • Cost of premiums + OOP = 23.6% of income * Premiums from the Kaiser Family Foundation on-line calculator; **Bronze level coverage has a minimum 60% actuarial value.

  20. A few more Exchange examples • Family of 4 making $67,000 (304%FPL): • $6395 annual premiums (9.5% of income) • $7973 maximum OOP (11% of income) • =21% of income spent on health care • Individual making $33,000 (305%FPL): • $3135 annual premiums (9.5% of income) • $3987 maximum OOP (12% of income) • =22% of income spent on health care

More Related