370 likes | 580 Views
Epidemiological structure. . environment. Infection source. Etiological agent. . Host. vector. Exposition situations. Historical antecedents. 1898 Ross - Avian malaria is transmitted by mosquitoes1899 Grassi, Bastianelli e Bignani ? Human malaria is transmitted by mosquitoesVector control action
E N D
2. Epidemiological structure
3. Historical antecedents 1898 Ross - Avian malaria is transmitted by mosquitoes
1899 Grassi, Bastianelli e Bignani – Human malaria is transmitted by mosquitoes
Vector control actions:
Small engineering works to reduce the anopheline breeding sites
Petroleum or kerosene to kill the larvae
4. Historical antecedents Gorgas and the Panama Canal
Control of breeding places
Protection of windows and doors
Quinine as prophylactic
Oswaldo Cruz and the Madeira Mamoré railway
Quinine as prophylactic: compulsory use
Protection of windows and doors
Restriction on exposure: people confined in rooms at the maximum day exposure time
5. Historical antecedents 1922 – Use of Paris Green as larvicide
1927 Carlos Chagas (Nations League Commission)
Chrysanthemum (piretro) burn to kill the adults mosquitoes
World War II:
Residual action from DDT
New synthetic drugs such as chloroquine
6. Epidemiological situation in Brazil 1913 Rockefeller Commission in São Paulo
Diagnoses rural centers to malaria and ancylostomosis
1914 Malaria notification begins
1916 Orientation on rustic house construction
1928 Adolpho Lutz
Alerts to the possibility that African mosquitoes can be introduced in the northeast region with the intensification of travel between Brazil (Natal) and Senegal (Dacar)
7. 1930 Shannon identified A.gambiae focus in Natal
Epidemic with 10,000 cases controlled by vector (larvae) control interventions
1938 Vale do Jaguaribe (CE)
Epidemic with 110,000 cases
First effort to eradicate anopheles by Fred Soper
Combat breeding locations
Domestic insecticide use (“Flit”) Epidemiological situation in Brazil
8. Eradication Campaign 1959 to 1963 São Paulo State
Incidence: 5.4 times reduction in five years
1965-1979 Brazil
40 million living in risk areas
110,000 cases in 1967 (attack phase)
50,000 cases in 1970
10. Control Models Environmental-ecologic model (1930-1950)
Complexity
Specific local characteristics
Limited application of technical instruments
Purpose: keep the work force active
Campaign-based technical model (1950-1970)
Standardization and massification
Slide and vector binome
Purpose: zero case
11. Focal and preventive model: (1970-1990)
Focus on individual
Actions concentrated in risk areas
Epidemiological surveillance
Purpose –
Mortality and morbidity reduction
Control of epidemics Control Models
12. 1980’s Transmission concentrated in Amazon (97.5% of cases)
Seringais – low population density, enduring settlements and slow mobility ? low incidence
Feeding grounds ? the same
Building company settlement – Control of entrance of people, vector control, rapid treatment and diagnosis ? controlled transmission
Close settlement of miners and prospectors – the same
Open settlement of miners and prospectors – high exposition, multiple breeding sites, asymptomatic carriers, difficult control activities ? high incidence
New areas of colonization – favorable conditions to transmission plus susceptible persons ? very high incidence, usually epidemic
Old colonization – better house conditions, domestic animals and agricultures ? low incidence
13. 1980’s Amazon region:
“Raids” – the same as the new colonization areas
Peri-urban – population migratory flux are continuous, sanitation conditions are bad ? high incidence
Indigenous settlements - variable conditions, depends on the mayor or minor contact with other populations
Extra-Amazon region
Receptive states:
Vectorial density
Infection sources circulation
Epidemiological surveillance structure
Exemples
Garimpo do Cumaru exported 8,683 cases to 381 cities in 11 states.
Ariquemes rural settlements exported 1,134 cases to 204 cities in 10 states
14. Control activities 1970’s – incidence increases x 3
1980-1985 – incidence increase x 2.4
1986:
80% of cases concentrated in MT, PA and RO
Impact operation – “zoning”
All febrile cases and other family members treated
All parasitized individuals treated
Mefloquine introduction for P.falciparum malaria treatment
15. 1990’s Malaria transmitted in only 80 cities
About 450,000 to 500,000 cases per year
WHO Ministerial Conference 1992 in Amsterdam totally changed control strategies
16. WHO Ministerial Conference 1992 Mass strategies were abandoned and were replaced by risk strategies
Disease management: case diagnosis and treatment assigned to primary care facilities
Disease prevention: measures of individual protection, chemoprophylaxis, and domiciliary vector control
Prevention and control of epidemics: traditional epidemiologic surveillance activities
Consequences:
Reduction of the financial support of malaria control
Reduction in vectorial control activities
Reduction in active case search activities
Epidemiological situation aggravated all over the world
18. PCMAM - Amazon Basin Malaria Control Program Objetive:
Incidence reduction
Promote the institutional development of SUCAM
Straiten the malaria control
Malaria control within the indigenous population
Results:
Organization of local health care facilities
Human resources training
Strategic research
Mortality reduction from 7.0 to 1.8 per 1,000 inhabitants between 1988 and 1996
Prevent the occurrence of 1.9 million new cases and 236,000 deaths
19. PCIN – National Integrated Control Program Objetive:
Diagnosis and treatment of all cases
Opportunely prevent and detect all epidemics
Use selective vector control strategies
Strengthen epidemiologic surveillance
Periodic evaluation of epidemiologic situation
Crisis at the FUNASA prevents the success of this plan
20. Incidence of Malaria in Amazon 1989-1999
21. Present Risk Areas
28. Seasonal Distribution
29. API in Amazon Region2005 -2006
30. Proportional age distribution
31. Treatment
32. PROGRAM OF INTENSIFICATION OF MALARIA CONTROL EFFORTS Control efforts were transferred to municipalities
Political commitment by the President, governors and mayors
Social costs taken into consideration
Inter-sectoral activities
Regular and constant funding
Monitoring program by means of periodic evaluations
33. PIACM Results (2000-2002)
Incidence reduction of 32%
Reduction in hospitalization
Fewer cases of P.vivax infection, proportionally
Fatality reduction
35. National malaria control program Objetive:
Avoid malaria mortality
Reduction in severity of cases
Reduction in incidence of Malaria
Elimination of urban malaria
Sustain transmission interruption in non- endemic areas
36. National malaria control program Goals:
20% reduction in deaths per year
20% reduction in number of malaria hospitalizations per year
20% reduction in the API per year
Urban malaria elimination by 2006
Avoid the autochthonous cases in areas where transmission was interrupted by surveillance activities
37. Epidemiologic characteristic Legal Amazon concentrates 99% of malaria cases
76 high risk cities and 111 of median risk
High API (10 times more than observed in 1970)
500,000 to 600,000 cases per year
Low fatality rate and low hospitalization rate
Median to high % of P.falciparum
Occurrence of urban epidemics
38. Bibliography Tauil, PL, Deane L, Sabroza PC. Ribeiro C. A malária no Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 1985, 1(1):71-111
Barata RB. Malária no Brasil: panorama epidemiológico na última década. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 1995, 11(1):128-136
Barata RB. Malária e seu controle. Editora HUCITEC 1998.
Loiola CCP, Silva CJM, Tauil,PL. Controle da malária no Brasil: 1965-2001. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública 2002, 11(4):235-244
Silva Junior JB. A malária no Brasil. SVS / MS, 2005.