1 / 27

Can We Fix It? Yes We Can! Service Centre Conference, Melbourne - May 2007

Can We Fix It? Yes We Can! Service Centre Conference, Melbourne - May 2007. Presented by: Student Information Centre (SIC), Swinburne University The SIC Technological Consultative Group: Ray Chan Siu-Ching Fong & Hwee-Ting Lee. Abstract.

sydnee
Download Presentation

Can We Fix It? Yes We Can! Service Centre Conference, Melbourne - May 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Can We Fix It? Yes We Can! Service Centre Conference, Melbourne - May 2007 Presented by: Student Information Centre (SIC), Swinburne University The SIC Technological Consultative Group: Ray Chan Siu-Ching Fong & Hwee-Ting Lee

  2. Abstract • Do not have an endless budget AND a team of IT techs behind you? • We will share with you our experience on developing technological solutions that relates to, and deliver efficiency to our local operations. • Examples of software and technological solutions will be highlighted as well as lessons learnt from the implementations.

  3. Swinburne Student Information Centre (SIC) • Established in 2004 • One centre on each 5 campuses • Services: • Provision of information and assistance to Swinburne Higher Education and TAFE students, Swinburne staff • Provision of documentation for students and external authorities; • Provision of course enquiries information; • General student administration tasks, including the processing and filing of student related materials and some cashiering. • Via: • Face-to-face (Counter) • Phone & E-mail (Contact Centre) • Online (Ask George)

  4. Technology Consultative Group • Group members are SIC staff • Initially formed to research technology solutions to identified areas • Open to helping SIC colleagues with technology solution

  5. Stages of Development • Review and identify the work processes that can be improved with technology without blowing the budget and relying heavily and solely on the University’s IT department (ITS) • Research on technological solutions that are available within the University and in the market • Select the most appropriate solution • Discuss feasibility of proposed solution with ITS

  6. Examples of Technological Solutions • Ask George • Academic Transcript Intranet • WIKI • CISCO Webcam

  7. Ask George • An online FAQ database for all current students & staff • Off the shelf product • Less than 2 years old • Aim: • Online channel & automation info provision • Cut down on repetitive enquiries – self serve • 24/ 7 access to information • Measure effectiveness – logins, answers viewed, searches & web enquiries • Same busy period for counter & online

  8. Screen Shot Ask George – Screen Shot

  9. Ask George (continued) • Project officer appointed to oversee the project • Implementation involved RightNow, SIC, ITS • Integrated behind the My.Swinburne portal • 2005 April start, July launch • Rolled out in stages – current students and staff, followed by prospective / general

  10. Ask George (continued) • Support: • Swinburne ITS • RightNow • Benchmarking: Turnaround reply time • Staff training • Staff buy-in: crucial • 12 licenses in use across 5 campuses • Info session, training session, manual for agents • On-going support for agents from AG Project Officer

  11. Academic Transcript Intranet • This is an example of a smaller scale technological solution • What is it? • Database-driven Intranet to manage the application process • How we developed and implemented it • Drafted Proposal and reviewed by the ITS • Using PHP and MYSQL • Intranet was developed and implemented in approximately six months

  12. Academic Transcript Intranet (continued) • Resources • ITS advice and expertise • Staff knowledge and expertise • Time allocation for staff to assist in the development of the project • Outcome • Multiple authorised users could update records simultaneously • The progress and status of the application also could be monitored easily • Reduces time required to run and analyse reports

  13. Search for a Record

  14. Search Result Page

  15. Reports

  16. WIKI • This is an example of a technological solution recommended by the University’s IT department • What is it? • Information-based intranet for SIC staff to receive the latest update on University’s matters • How we developed and implemented it • Sought advice from ITS • Requested a trial to be conducted

  17. WIKI (continued) • Resources • ITS expertise • Staff feedback and contribution • Outcome • More user-friendly website • Less frustration and time wasted • Provide statistical report

  18. WIKI (Home Page)

  19. Example of a Topic

  20. Cisco Webcam • A face to face communication tool • Resources + Development time: Guidance from relevant people • Outcomes A work in progress, functional Timesaver/ease to schedule and conduct multi-campus meetings • The system is functional, But not as expected

  21. Conclusions • Lessons Learnt • Things To Consider • Q& As

  22. Lessons Learnt • Develop strong relationship with the University's IT department • Careful planning of staff resources and time to ensure minimal disruptions to daily operations • Start small – enhance later • Training

  23. Things to Consider: • Researching our needs – planning our solution • Ensure our end product fits our strategic needs • Facilitate sharing of information; • Save time and effort (automate process where possible) • Self serve – can students & staff use this independently? • Benchmarking capability for KPIs • Customer Service level improvement

  24. Things to Consider (continued) • Service Level Agreement’s - Who will support it? • Resources for technological improvements • Patience • Involving ITS • Use Feedback and Quality Content to improve the project

  25. Can We Fix It? Yes we can! BUT…. With Support

  26. Questions ?

  27. Thank You

More Related