1 / 28

The Triangle-free 2-matching Polytope Of Subcubic Graphs

The Triangle-free 2-matching Polytope Of Subcubic Graphs. Kristóf Bérczi Egerváry Research Group (EGRES) Eötvös Loránd University Budapest ISMP 2012. Motivation. Hamiltonian cycle problem. Relaxation : Find a subgraph with degrees = 2

sybil
Download Presentation

The Triangle-free 2-matching Polytope Of Subcubic Graphs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Triangle-free 2-matching Polytope Of SubcubicGraphs Kristóf Bérczi Egerváry Research Group (EGRES) Eötvös Loránd University Budapest ISMP 2012

  2. Motivation

  3. Hamiltonian cycleproblem Relaxation: Find a subgraph • withdegrees = 2 • containingno „short” cycles (lengthat most k) Fisher, Nemhauser, Wolsey ‘79: howsolutionsfortheweighted version approximatetheoptimalTSP Remark: for k > n/2therelax. and the HCP areequivalent

  4. Connectivityaugmentation Problem:Make G k-node-connectedbyadding a minimum number of newedges. k = n-1: trivial (completegraph) k = n-2: maximalmatchinginG

  5. n-4 n-4 k=n-3: Deleting n-4 nodes G remainsconnected. G G Degreesat most 2 in G. No cycleof length 4. n-4 n-4

  6. Definitions

  7. G=(V,E) undirected, simple, b:V→Z+ Def.: A b-matchingis a subset F⊆E s.t. dF(v) ≤ b(v)foreachnodev. If=holdseverywhere, then F is a b-factor. Ifb=tforeachnode: t-matching. Examples: b=1 b=2

  8. LetK be a list of forbiddensubgraphs. Def.: A K-free b-matchingcontains no member of K. Def.: A C(≤)k-free 2-matching contains no cycle of length(at most) k. • Hamiltonian relax.:C≤k-free 2-factor • Node-conn. aug.: C4-free 2-matching Notation: C3=∆, C4=◊ Example: k=3

  9. Previouswork Papadimitriu ‘80: • NP-hardfor k ≥ 5 Vornberger ‘80: • NP-hardincubicgraphsfor k ≥ 5 • NP-hardincubicgraphsfor k = 4 withweights Hartvigsen ’84: • Polynomialalgorithmfor k=3 Hartvigsen and Li ‘07, Kobayashi ‘09: • Polynomialalgorithmfor k=3 insubcubicgraphswithgeneralweigths Nam ‘94: • Polynomialalgorithmfor k=4 if ◊’s arenode-disjoint Hartvigsen ‘99, Király ’01, Pap ’05, Takazawa ‘09: • Resultsforbipartitegraphs and k=4 Frank ‘03, Makai ‘07: • Kt,t-free t-matchingsinbipartitegraphs B. and Kobayashi ’09, Hartvigsen and Li ‘11: • Polynomialalgorithmfor k=4 insubcubicgraphs B. and Végh ’09, Kobayashi and Yin ‘11: • Kt,t- and Kt+1-free t-matchingsindegree-boundedgraphs

  10. Polyhedraldescriptions

  11. The b-factorpolytope Def.: The b-factorpolytopeis theconvex hull of incedencevectorsofb-factors. Def.: (K,F) is a blossomif K⊆V, F⊆δ(K) and b(K)+|F| is odd. F K

  12. matching The b-factorpolytope matching Def.: The b-factorpolytopeis theconvex hull of incedencevectorsofb-factors. Thm.: The b-factorpolytopeis determinedby matchings matching

  13. The C(≤)k-freecase The weighted C(≤)k-free 2-matching (factor) problem is NP-hardfor k ≥ 4 Whataboutk = 3 ??? Problem:Give a description of the∆-free 2-matching (factor) polytope. UNSOLVED!

  14. matchings Triangle-free 2-factors Conjecture: Thm.: (Hartvigsen and Li ’07) Forsubcubic G, the ∆-free 2-factor polytope is determinedby NOT TRUE !!! matching

  15. Subcubicgraphs Problemwithdegrees „Usual” way of proof: G G’ ∆ -free 2-factors ∆ -free 2-matchings 3 3 3

  16. Tri-combs Def.: (K,F,T) is a tri-combif K⊆V, T is a set of ∆’s „fitting” K, F⊆δ(K) and |T|+|F| is odd.

  17. Triangle-free 2-matchings Thm.: (Hartvigsen and Li ’12) Forsubcubic G, the ∆-free 2-matching polytope is determinedby

  18. New proof

  19. Perfectmatchings Thm.: (Edmonds ‘65) The p.m. polytopeis determinedby Proof: (Aráoz, Cunningham, Edmonds and Green-Krótki, andSchrijver)

  20. Anotherproof Thm.: (Edmonds ‘65) The p.m. polytopeis determinedby Proof: (Aráoz, Cunningham, Edmonds and Green-Krótki, andSchrijver)

  21. Anotherproof Thm.: (Edmonds ‘65) The p.m. polytopeis determinedby Proof: (Aráoz, Cunningham, Edmonds and Green-Krótki, andSchrijver)

  22. Technical… Extendconvexcombinationtotheoriginalproblem Plan Shrinkthecomplement, putcombinationstogether Areinequalitiestruefor x’? Tricky ! OR Defineshrinking Definetightness Yipp ! Hartvigsen and Li

  23. Shrinking

  24. Shrinking a tight ∆

  25. Shrinking a tighttri-comb

  26. Conclusions

  27. Now: • New proofforthedescription of the ∆-free 2-matching polytope of subcubicgraphs • Slightgeneralization • list of triangles • b-matching; onnodes of triangles b = 2 • notsubcubic; degrees of trianglenodes ≤ 3 Open problems: • Algorithmfor maximum ◊-free 2-matching • Description of the∆-free 2-matchingpolytopeingeneralgraphs

  28. Thankyouforyourattention!

More Related