pct rm g as a model of good practice n.
Skip this Video
Download Presentation

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 19


  • Uploaded on

PCT RM&G AS A MODEL OF GOOD PRACTICE. Rhian Hughes - Chair Gill Sarre - Facilitator Primary Care Working Group. BACKGROUND. Proposed national system of expert centres and networks to support delivery of RM&G

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'PCT RM&G AS A MODEL OF GOOD PRACTICE' - sveta

Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
pct rm g as a model of good practice


Rhian Hughes - Chair

Gill Sarre - Facilitator

Primary Care Working Group

  • Proposed national system of expert centres and networks to support delivery of RM&G
  • Aim is to reduce duplication by having unified process for NHS R&D approval within NHS health communities (new SHAs)
aims for r d management and governance
Best Research for Best Health

A vibrant efficient research environment that commands public confidence and protects research participants, through

World-class networks for R&D management and governance

Action to simplify processes that use research time

Governance, advice, ethics

Do only once in a single place, whatever does not have to be done in many places

Maximise the joint use of standardised systems and processes

Support local decisions with national standards, templates and datasets

Give active support to high quality research

Aims for R&D management and governance
expert support joined up systems
Expert support, joined-up systems
  • Network of expert centres serving each health economy
  • National advice service
  • Research passports

Supported by

  • NIHR web site, portal to information services
  • Unified IT systems:
    • Input information once
    • Populate ethics and NHS R&D applications, NRR
    • Published papers, repository
networked r d offices
Networked R&D offices

SHA-led local implementation planning to:

  • Define health economies for networks in SHA area
  • Identify network R&D offices to coordinate resources
  • Decide which other well-established R&D offices will provide R&D management and governance functions:
    • network functions
    • care organisations’ functions including governance checks
    • one-stop shop to serve each research-active site

Planning in 2006-07; implementation from 2007-08

rm g in primary care
RM&G in Primary Care
  • Consortia of PCTs were established to deliver RM&G in 2003
  • Their development provides a model of good practice which could inform the NHS Implementation Plan for Governance
workshop aim
Workshop aim
  • To characterise good practice models for RM&G established in primary care
  • Share examples of good working methods
  • Highlight potential problems in running shared arrangements
  • Agree feedback to DH
characteristics of good practice 1 shared arrangements
Characteristics of good practice: 1. Shared arrangements
  • Based on a formal agreement
  • Explicit roles and responsibilities distributed across
    • Member PCTs
    • R&D office
    • R&D leads vis a vis R&D Officer
  • Sign up to a shared system and the procedures that support it
  • Clear system of delegation
  • R&D officer can provide approvals
2 streamlining the process
2. Streamlining the process
  • Link R&D and COREC documentation
  • Check for evidence rather than review again
  • Distinguish between projects that need
    • Permission - Notification and registration
    • Approval – Formal checks
  • Accept the approvals (and Honorary Contracts) of others
  • Target timescales for approval of valid applications
3 adding value to the process
3. Adding value to the process
  • Support for novice researchers
    • Research design
    • Writing a good ethics and R&D application
  • Common procedures across the NHS interface (GPs, Community Services, PCTs, DGHs, Teaching Hospitals
  • Stronger infrastructure to host research
1 shared arrangements
1. Shared Arrangements
  • Formal SLAs between partners (ToolKit model)
  • Merged RM&G Partnerships (Essex, Manchester)
      • ‘One stop shop’
  • Lead R&D Office (LNR SHA)
      • Responsible for co-ordinating review process
      • Across all NHS organisations in area
      • Supported by agreed SOPs
2 streamlining
2. Streamlining
  • Standard Operating Procedures (Herts RM&G Collaborative)
      • Explicit procedures, agreed with partners
  • Computerised management systems (Nottingham RM&G)
      • Monitoring timescales
      • Alerts and checks
      • Clear audit trail
3 adding value
3. Adding Value
  • Agreements across NHS Trust / University partnerships
      • Shared systems and defined roles & responsibilities; supported by Peer Review committee for “on-account” research
  • Agreements & guidance emerging from cross organisational working
      • E.g. Research Governance Best Practice Group (Notts, Lincs, Derby) – Data Management in Research
annual reports 2005
Annual Reports - 2005
  • Approaches to awareness raising, dissemination, training
  • Specific RG guidance - manual, handbook, leaflets
  • Reciprocal monitoring & audit arrangements with neighbouring trusts
  • Responsibility for approvals delegated to RG Manager if criteria met.
  • SHA wide approval process for multi-site studies
annual reports 20051
Annual Reports - 2005
  • Regional forum – R&D Managers, OREC manager, REC chairs
  • Use of Standard R&D Approval form – widespread commitment to use
  • Piloting of turn-around times
some unresolved issues
Some unresolved issues
  • Can assessment of local issues be delegated to other care organisations?
  • Simple methodology for risk assessment, to filter projects that need registration as opposed to approval
  • Excess treatment costs
  • Drug costs
  • Models and working examples of good practice
  • Specific issues that need policy development
  • Feedback to DH
contact details

NHS R&D Forum website: www.rdforum.nhs.uk

Further information on the Tool-kit or PCWG from:

  • Rhian Hughes, Chair, PCWG r.w.hughes@cphc.keele.ac.uk
  • Gill Sarre - Facilitator, PCWG gill.sarre@nottingham.ac.uk