Colorado ballot issue amendment 62
1 / 15

Colorado Ballot Issue : Amendment 62 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Colorado Ballot Issue : Amendment 62 . Ballot Question.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Colorado Ballot Issue : Amendment 62' - summer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Ballot question
Ballot Question

  • Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution applying the term “person” as used in the those provisions of the Colorado constitution relating to the inalienable rights, equality of  justice, and due process of law, to every human being from the beginning of the biological development of that human being?  

Kid s voting ballot question
Kid’s Voting Ballot Question

  • Should the Colorado Constitution be amended to define the word “person” as every human being from the beginning of the biological development of the human being

  • Information from Kids Voting


  • Inalienable rights- all persons have certain, essential rights that include enjoying and defending their lives, acquiring, possessing and protecting property; safety and happiness


Interpretation cont
Interpretation cont.

  • Equality of justice- the courts shall be open to every person and afforded for every injury to person; right and justice shall be administered without sale, or denial


Interpretation cont1
Interpretation cont.

  • Due process-(law) the administration of justice according to established rules and principles; based on the principle that a person cannot be deprived of life or liberty or property without appropriate legal procedures and safeguards



  • Several religious groups are pro-amendment 62 because they interpret the beginning of life as conception

  • The Catholic church has been a big factor in supporting bills such as Amendment 62

  • Would prevent abortion in Colorado

  • Typically pro life groups support this amendment

    • Most Republican candidates

      Information gleaned from

Intentional harm support groups
Intentional Harm- Support Groups

  • Choosing to physically remove a fetus from the mother’s body

    • This is included under inalienable rights

  • Support groups use this intentional act as evidence that abortion violates a person’s rights by causing intentional harm to them.

    • This would includes any procedures, pills, or medical care that may harm a “person” from conception


  • Most pro-choice groups are against the amendment

    • Most Democrats

  • Opposition says it would take away a woman’s freedom to have control over her body

  • Would hinder stem cell research

  • Would “stretch” the limitations of the law

Unintentional harm
Unintentional harm

  • If Amendment 62 should pass it would be pushing the boundaries of the law

  • It would put medical professionals at a liability

    • Treat a woman; damaging an unborn child

  • Would the law apply to a woman who harms a baby by smoking, neglecting to buckle up, alcoholism, or any other physical neglect?

  • In other words what are the limitations of the law?

Historic pass fail
Historic Pass/Fail

  • In 2008 a similar bill in Colorado failed with a 73% vote against the bill

  • Six states have created and repealed abortion laws due to “dirty” abortions and out of country abortions

  • The United States has been working to create abortion laws to please both sides ; since the early 1900 they have been unsuccessful

Abortion awareness
Abortion Awareness

  • Does Roe Vs. Wade go far enough in making abortion legal?