300 likes | 325 Views
Explore the factors influencing farmers and spouses' choice of off-farm work using econometric methods on data from Pennsylvania farms. Results show significant impacts of personal, household, and labour market characteristics. Predictive analysis reveals patterns in decision-making.
E N D
Off-farm labour participation of farmers and spouses Alessandro Corsi University of Turin
The problem • Off-farm work is widespread • It helps the adjustment process of farmers to new market conditions • It is important to analyse the variables that influence the choice of working off the farm
Theoretical model • Off-farm work participation is a dichotomous variable (may be yes or no) • The farmer chooses to work off the farm if the market wage is larger than the reservation wage (= the minimum wage for which he is willing to work off the farm)
Theoretical model • The reservation wage therefore depends on: • personal characteristics (age, sex, education, etc.) • household characteristics (e.g., number of children) • farm characteristics(size, farming system, etc.)
Theoretical model • The market wage depends on: • personal characteristics (age, sex, education, etc) • characteristics of the labour market
Theoretical model • The farmer will have an off-farm job if: • market wage > reservation wage • W > W*
Theoretical model The market wage can be written: The reservation wage can be written:
Theoretical model The difference between the market and the reservation wage, w - w* is :
Theoretical model For brevity, y*can be written as: (X are all the explanatory variables, and e = m - h is the random term)
Theoretical model y* cannot be observed; it can only be observed if the farmer works off the farm or not. Then: Pr[off-farm work] = Pr[y* > 0] = = Pr[a’X < e] = F[a’X] ( F is the cumulative probability of the random variable e, assumed to be normal)
Theoretical model • The parameters of the equation can be estimated through a probit model • It yields the probability of the outcome (off-farm yes or no) as a function of the explanatory variables • It is also possible to estimate the change in probability resulting from a change in the explanatory variable (marginal effect)
Data • 351 farms in Pennsylvania surveyed in 1985 and again in 1991 • 351 farm operators • 344 spouses
Data • data on personal characteristics: • age, sex, education • data on household characteristics: • # children of different age
Data • data on farm characteristics: • farm size • principal farm enterprise (dairy, other labour intensive, all-year-round or seasonal - dummy variables)
Data • characteristics of the labour market • employment share by sector • ratio of average nonfarm to farm incomes • unemployment rate
Results • Models estimated for operators and spouses: • fitting • results • comment
Results Operators
Results • FOR OPERATORS: • Personal characteristics have a significant impact on off-farm labour participation • The same is true for farm characteristics and labour market characteristics • Household characteristics do not significantly affect operators’ choices
Results Spouses
Results Spouses
Results • FOR SPOUSES: • Among personal characteristics, only education has a significant impact on off-farm labour participation • Household characteristics, particularly small children, significantly affect spouses’ choices • Farm characteristics have no influence • Among labour market characteristics, only low-wage manufacturing employment increases the probability of off-farm work
Results • Further results can be drawn from more sophisticated econometric methods by using data from both surveys • Farmers and spouses who choose an off-farm work in the pastare more likely to make the same choice in the following • For farmers, this is most likely because when they started an off-farm work they modified the farm, so that it is not easy to come back • For spouses, this is most likely because they accumulated work experience, and hence, have higher market wages.
Conclusions • This is an example of how econometric methods can be used to assess empirical questions • The results are consistent with the theory, but more detail has been gained • It is possible to make predictions of what will happen if some explanatory variable will change • It is possible to detail these effects for farmers and spouses (who exhibit different behaviour), for small and large farms, etc.