1 / 33

ECE 4773 - Team 3A Senior Capstone Lab Fall 2006

ECE 4773 - Team 3A Senior Capstone Lab Fall 2006. SUBSEA BLOW-OUT PREVENTER (BOP) CONTROL MODULE. Team 3a. Name: Rob Warren Position: Project Manager. Team 3a. Name: Mark Shook Position: Configuration Manager. Team 3a. Name: Robert Fenton Position: Correspondent Officer. Team 3a.

suchin
Download Presentation

ECE 4773 - Team 3A Senior Capstone Lab Fall 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ECE 4773 - Team 3ASenior Capstone Lab Fall 2006 SUBSEA BLOW-OUT PREVENTER (BOP) CONTROL MODULE

  2. Team 3a Name: Rob Warren Position: Project Manager

  3. Team 3a Name: Mark Shook Position: Configuration Manager

  4. Team 3a Name: Robert Fenton Position: Correspondent Officer

  5. Team 3a Name: Duy Nguyen Position: Financial Officer

  6. HYDRIL PRESSURE CONTROL • Surface • Foreman Control • Central Processing • Sub-Sea • Annular BOPs • Ram BOPs • Control Systems

  7. Requirements • List of Critical Product Requirements • Operate in pressures up to 6700 psi. • Operate two solenoids • Monitor ram position (LVDT 0-10V) • Calculate flow count (5- 100 GPM) via flow meter • Communication to external host • Capable of testing internal components • Modular

  8. OBJECTIVE RELIABLE SUBMERSIBLE SCALABLE

  9. DESIGN PARADIGM • Communications (TCP/IP) • Host to Sub-Sea Unit • Fiber Optics • Sub-Sea Intranet • Ethernet (802.3)

  10. DESIGN PARADIGM • Logic • Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) • Redundant • Reliable • Programmable

  11. DESIGN PARADIGM • Sensor Interface • Flow Meter • Ram Position Sensor • Solenoid Interface • Modified H-bridge • Dual Direction • Solenoid Test • H-bridge Test

  12. HARDWARE SYSTEM Host LVDT Main Logic (FPGA) A/D converter Flow Meter Self Test Power Interface (Solenoid) Solenoids

  13. SOFTWARE SYSTEM NET IFACE NET IFACE COMMUNICATIONS BUFFER BUFFER BUFFER LOGIC CORE LOGIC CORE LOGIC CORE MAJORITY VOTER SOLENOID SOLENOID

  14. SOFTWARE SYSTEM NET IFACE NET IFACE COMMUNICATIONS BUFFER BUFFER BUFFER LOGIC CORE LOGIC CORE LOGIC CORE ADC ADC ADC FLOW METER

  15. SOFTWARE SYSTEM NET IFACE NET IFACE COMMUNICATIONS BUFFER BUFFER BUFFER LOGIC CORE LOGIC CORE LOGIC CORE ADC ADC ADC LVDT

  16. Functional Block Diagram Clocks Cond-itioning ATD Solenoid Control Microblaze Processor Ethernet Controller Solenoid Control Power Solenoid- 60V LVDT -10V H-Bridge- 60V FPGA- 3.2V Mini module- 2.5V A/D converter 3.3V Mechanical External pressure (6700 psi) Size Functional Block Diagram Inputs LVDT Flowmeter Network/ (802.3) Outputs Solenoid (1) (2 leads) Solenoid (2) (2 leads) Network/ (802.3) Power to sensors

  17. Solenoid Controller Solenoid 1 IsolatedSensor High-VoltageController CPU Isolation IsolatedSensor Solenoid 2

  18. TIMELINE • Critical Points • Critical Design Review (CDR) • Initial Assembly • Test Requirement Document (TRD) • Final Assembly • Testing • Project Completion Date

  19. Project Completion Dec. 01 Critical Design Review Oct. 16 Parts Arrive- Initial Assembly Oct. 23 Final Assembly Nov. 10 TRD Nov. 3 Testing Nov. 13

  20. WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

  21. COST OF MATERIALS ORDERED

  22. Labor Hours Analysis • Weeks 1- 12 were slightly over allocated • Weeks 13-15 were under allocated • Overall Estimate at completion was under budgeted

  23. Key features/Performance highlights • Web user interface • Ability to fire both solenoids • Ease of interconnectivity/scalability • Able to test the H-Bridge and solenoid coil with a trickle current.

  24. Tests Via TRD • Feature Testing • Send each software command from the host to the module and verify appropriate action / response • Redundancy Testing • Disconnect both solenoids, instigate solenoid testing, and verify system failure report • Individually disconnect each A/D converter, instigate a position measurement and verify individual system failure report (non-compliant subsystem) • Power off 60V power supply, instigate solenoid controller test, and verify system failure report

  25. Control Module

  26. FPGA Board & Base

  27. Solenoid Control/Test Module

  28. Recommendations • Communication Improvements The Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) is using a Microblaze processor core which is running a sample webserver software package for Ethernet communication. This is a very limited server application and should be improved to allow for greater reliability and versatility. Currently the only means for accessing status information through the control module is by using any standard web browser. This can be very useful, though we recommend when improving the server software concurrently creating a host communication program. This program which would run on any PC or even server class machine could communicate with the control unit on a separate port than the web browser. This would allow for faster more data oriented communications, facilitating improved testing and allowing easier and more frequent collection of sub-sea data such as equipment operability status

  29. Recommendations Redundancy The proposed design called for a highly redundant control unit, using three independent logic cores. These were designed, but not implemented due to time constraints. It is recommended to add these logic cores to the FPGA internal hardware. This Tri-Core technology will create greater redundancy and reliability by using the Microblaze processor solely as the communications driver. The design for this architecture can be located in Appendix 2.

  30. Recommendations • Additional Peripherals This design is highly scalable with over 100 unused I/O pins. These can be used to easily add the LVDT sensors through external A/D converters including redundant circuitry as well as the flow meter’s pulse train input. In addition, one control module could be configured to operate multiple pairs of solenoids by using an additional optocoupler / H-Bridge circuit for each added pair of solenoids. Multiple sensors could also be added to the control module through unused I/O pins.

  31. SUMMARY • Current System • Limited Environment • Static • Proposed System • Reliable • Submersible • Scalable

  32. SUMMARY • Straightforward Solution • High Level Programming • Completed by December 1st

  33. HYDRIL “High Performance Products for Exploration and Production Worldwide”

More Related