1 / 41

BUILDING TEACHING WITH TECHNOLOGY: STRUCTURE & INFRASTRUCTURE

BUILDING TEACHING WITH TECHNOLOGY: STRUCTURE & INFRASTRUCTURE. Charles Alston, Laura Broughton, Jose Lai, Stephen Powers, & Albert Robinson Bronx Community College NERCOMP march 13, 2012. Bronx Community College. Approximately 11,000 students Predominantly low-income and minority

Download Presentation

BUILDING TEACHING WITH TECHNOLOGY: STRUCTURE & INFRASTRUCTURE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BUILDING TEACHING WITH TECHNOLOGY: STRUCTURE & INFRASTRUCTURE Charles Alston, Laura Broughton, Jose Lai, Stephen Powers, & Albert Robinson Bronx Community College NERCOMP march 13, 2012

  2. Bronx Community College • Approximately 11,000 students • Predominantly low-income and minority • Most require remedial coursework in math, reading, and writing • Aging campus • Limited accessibility • Insufficient electrical capacity • Insufficient networking capabilities

  3. How the Campus Has Changed In 2005: In 2011: • Few courses offered online • Few courses made available in Bb LMS • No technologically-equipped classrooms • Minimal faculty development for online teaching • No online student support services • 44 courses offered online • ½ courses made available in Bb LMS • 35 (+8)technologically-equipped classrooms • Faculty development through OIT • Ongoing collaborative effort among scheduling, registrar, IT, bursar’s

  4. The Faculty Development Program Participating in the faculty development program is required for any instructor intending to teach a distance-learning course

  5. Office of Instructional Technology TIMELINE • Level 1 training for new users • Level 2 training for returning users • Web 2.0 applications and podcasting /video casting • Faculty Outcomes • 2010 -2011 • Level 1 training for new users • Level 2 training for returning users • Web 2.0 applications and podcasting /video casting 2009 Third Model 2008 Same Model Used same model Faculty Showcase • Two day intensive training • Follow-up semester with four meetings • Peer Mentoring 2007 Change Model 2006 Same Model Used same model Trained Student Tutors (ITT’s) • Intensive week-long session • Follow-up semester with four meetings • Peer Mentoring • 2005 • A New Model

  6. Faculty Development • Summer Workshops, first week of June • Two/Three day Bb intensive taught by experienced Bb instructors who are the semester mentors • Two day Web 2.0 tools workshop taught by Bb Admins and faculty practitioners • Ongoing mentoring throughout the summer • Previous Model - Fall development, Spring “Live” • New Model - Fall semester • Hybrid (25% - 75% online) with mentoring • Blended (50/50) with mentoring • Course materials must be completed by July 31st

  7. The Numbers . . . Since 2006: Fall 2010: • 92 faculty have been trained in online course development • 2011 – 4 + 16 • 2010 – 11+12 • 2009 – 11 • 2008 – 14 • 2007 – 12 • 2006 – 12 • 36 faculty teaching distance-learning courses • 48 distance-learning courses scheduled • About 1/3 of Bb courses at BCC taught as web-enhanced

  8. Peer Mentoring Is Essential to Faculty Development at BCC mentoring plays a central role in faculty development and online course delivery

  9. The BCC Mentors… • Laura Broughton – completed two summer workshops and was invited to join OIT Mentoring Program • Giulia Guarnieri – completed one summer workshop and was invited to join OIT mentoring program, lead developer of the podcasting program • MoronkeOshin-Martin – completed one summer workshop and was invited to join OIT mentoring program and podcasting program

  10. What do Mentors do? • Mentors teach • Summer workshops and one-on-one meetings • Mentors model • Summer workshops & Fall meetings • Mentors support faculty and students • Help with student orientation in first classes of the semester • Online delivery • Mentors troubleshoot • Faculty and ITTs feel free to contact mentors (e-mail, phone, face-to-face) in order to ask questions or learn new functions. • Usually, mentors can solve or expedite a solution. • Mentors connect with OIT and IT

  11. Mentoring as a Catalyst for Innovation • Common challenges for faculty development: • Recruiting new faculty to use instructional technology • Joining together “islands of innovation” so that technology use is pervasive rather than isolated • Maintenance of instructional technology • BCC’s focus on intensive mentoring has led to a supportive environment that fosters: • Faculty Interest in Retraining & Expanded Training • Faculty Trying New Technologies on Their Own • Adoption of Technologies by Classes with Multiple Sections • Joint Training between Faculty and ITTs

  12. Faculty Interest in Expanded Training faculty interest in re-training and expanded training, where faculty return to explore “next-generation” technologies like Web 2.0 and podcasting

  13. Expanded Training - Web 2.0 in Education • Increases user creativity and community while concurrently empowering user ownership of content • User-generated content leading to "collective intelligence" that benefits many • Collaborative in nature and features user-generated content What is Web 2.0

  14. Expanded Training - Faculty Learning Outcomes • Faculty can introduce more information outside the classroom • Faculty are able to engage hard to reach students • Faculty store more course information and resources for student review 27 faculty have participated in level 2 training in the last 3 years

  15. Expanded Faculty Training – Web 2.0/Open Source Recommended Web 2.0 tools • VoiceThread: http://voicethread.comVoiceThread is a new way to talk about and share your images, documents, and videos. • Scribblar: http://www.scribblar.com/Simple, effective online collaboration multi-user whiteboard, live audio, image collaboration, text-chat and more. • Pbworks: http://pbworks.com/content/edu+overviewPBworks hosts over 300,000 educational workspaces, and has helped transform teaching and learning for millions of students, parents and teachers.

  16. Expanded Faculty Training – Open Source Recommended Open Source tools • Cam Studio: http://camstudio.org/CamStudio is able to record all screen and audio activity on your computer and create industry-standard AVI video files. Using its built-in SWF Producer can turn those AVIs into lean, mean, bandwidth-friendly Streaming Flash videos (SWFs) . • Windows Producer: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=1B3C76D5-FC75-4F99-94BC-784919468E73&displaylang=enUse Microsoft Producer for Microsoft Office PowerPoint to capture and synchronize audio, video, slides, and images, then preview and publish a rich media presentation virtually anywhere for viewing in a Web browser.

  17. Expanded Training – Podcasting Technology • Audacity: http://audacity.sourceforge.net/ • Free, Bb-compatible, easy-to-use, downloadable program that makes great quality wav & mp3 audio files • Windows movie maker • Free, Bb-compatible video-editing & creating program that allows you to add a commentary tracks to powerpoint presentations, photos, and videos • I Tunes U • Integrated with Bb

  18. Faculty Trying New Technologies on Their Own greater faculty willingness to incorporate new technologies into their teaching, often without formal training

  19. Prof. Carlos Liachovitzky: Anatomy & Physiology • Participated in the summer 2008 faculty development program and 2010 hybrid initiative • Developed a hybrid BIO 23 (Anatomy & Physiology I) • Subsequently, incorporated new technologies in Bb hybrid & web-enhanced courses: • External website: http://sites.google.com/ • Online course materials & study guide: http://issuu.com/ • Videos: http://www.youtube.com/ • Crosswords: http://www.eclipsecrossword.com/ • Course materials outside Bb: http://pbworks.com/ • Online office hours: http://www.scribblar.com

  20. C. Liachovitzky – Google Site http://sites.google.com/site/bio2324atbcc/

  21. C. Liachovitzky – Online Study Guide http://sites.google.com/site/bio2324atbcc/Home/bio23-course-guide-and-lab-manual/

  22. C. Liachovitzky – YouTube Channel http://www.youtube.com/user/aandpatbcc

  23. C. Liachovitzky – Crosswords http://anatomyphysiologybcc.pbworks.com/f/Chapter1+interactive+with+JavaScript.html

  24. Other Faculty Expanding the Use of Technology on Campus • JordiGetman-Eraso • E-portfolio (Digication) • Giulia Guarnieri • Podcasting • Kenya Harris • VoiceThread • MoronkeOshin-Martin • VoiceThread

  25. Adoption of Technologies by Classes with Multiple Sections expanded application of technologies into classes with multiple sections or multi-class sequences and broader participation among new faculty Funded by the title v “learning by design” grant

  26. Biology & Medical Laboratory Technology • Goal: Improved student learning outcomes for critical thinking and the scientific method • Method: Incorporate more inquiry-based and active learning activities in Anatomy & Physiology and Introductory General Biology labs • Technology: PowerLab hardware with LabTutor and LabAuthor software from AD Instruments

  27. Implementation in Biology • Intro General Biology • 1 lab (photosynthesis) • 10 to 12 sections, ~300 students • Anatomy & Physiology I • 2 labs (pulse, bp, ECG, muscles) • 22 sections, ~528 students • Anatomy & Physiology II • 1 lab (spirometry) • 12 sections, ~288 students By Fall 2012, fully implemented in Anatomy & Physiology I, partially implemented in General Biology and A&P II.

  28. Nursing & Allied Health • Goal: Improved therapeutic communication skills and improved clinical skills • Method: Incorporate simulations into the curriculum and provide opportunities for students to view & critique their communication and clinical skills • Technology: VoiceThread, Simulation Laboratory (webcams, microphones, computers) the whisper booth in the Sim Lab

  29. Implementation in Nursing & Allied Health • Participating Courses • RAD 16 • NUR 41-42 • PNR 12 • Activities • Self-reflection (VoiceThread) • Participation in & critique of clinical simulations • 120 students participate each semester

  30. Implementation in Nursing & Allied Health

  31. Joint Training between Faculty & ITTs the integration of Instructional Technology Tutors (students trained in technology, tutoring, and course content) into faculty training from the beginning

  32. Instructional Technology Tutors • The Instructional Technology Tutor (ITT) Program • Administered through OIT; coordinated by Stephen Powers • Identifies excellent students in specific content areas • Trains those students in tutoring techniques and the use of technology • Approximately 35 students and former students have worked as ITTs since 2004 • The ITT program grew out of an extensive history of tutors at BCC, supported by the Perkins tutoring program and spearheaded by the Education & Reading Department

  33. Instructional Technology Tutors • ITTs Support Students • Technology (Bb, e-portfolio, CUNY Portal) • Course Content • ITTs Support Faculty • Technology (Bb, Podcasts, Digital Story-telling, e-portfolios) • Instructional Design • ITTs Support Instructional Technology • COWs, SMART board, projectors, cameras, etc. • ITTs Evolved into Mentors (FYS and SAP) • See the Presentation at 2:00, later today, Room 551 • Crystal Lopez and Jeffrey Cruz

  34. ITTs – Then & Now

  35. ITTs Now

  36. Instructional Technology Tutors • Incorporating ITTs into faculty training earlier has been beneficial • ITTs matched to faculty based on content/subject area • Additional aid for faculty when developing courses • ITTs have evolved from Student Support to Faculty Support • From Tutoring to Technology Support • From Virtual or Face-2-Face to Hybrid • Establishment of working relationship prior to semester start • Earlier tutoring and technology troubleshooting available to students in distance learning courses

  37. Conclusions In spite of aging infrastructure, bronx community college has successfully implemented a strong faculty development program and improved the availability of technology on campus

  38. Faculty who are mentored … • Return for expanded training • Try new technologies on their own • Convince their colleagues to try new technologies • Push for the adoption of technologies at the program and department level • Work well with instructional technology tutors • Know they can ask faculty mentors for advice, even years later

  39. The Future • Merging the Office of Instructional Technology with the Center for Teaching Excellence • Development of an online degree program • Increase breadth and scope of ITTs • A concerted joint effort to improve online student services (ODAC)

  40. The Presenters Charles Alston Charles.alston@bcc.cuny.edu Laura broughtonlaura.broughton@bcc.cuny.edu Jose Lai jose.lai@bcc.cuny.edu Stephen Powers stephen.powers@bcc.cuny.edu Albert robinsonalbert.robinson@bcc.cuny.edu

  41. Acknowledgments • Dr. Howard Wach, founding Director of the Office of Instructional Technology and current interim Vice-President of Academic Affairs @ BCC • The Hybrid Initiative from the CUNY Office of Academic Affairs • Title V “Learning by Design” Grant • Carlos Liachovitzky, Alex Wolf, Rebeca Araya, Biology & Medical Laboratory Technology Department, BCC • Ellen R. Hoist (MS, RN), AlnisaShabazz (MS, RN), Regina Panettiere (MPA, RT(R)(CT)), Kenya Harris (MA, RN), Paula Green (MA, RN), Nursing & Allied Health Department, BCC • Kate Culkin, Laurel Cummings, JordiGetman-Eraso • The ITTs – past & present • José Lai, Academic Technology Liaison, BCC

More Related