Finding a maximum independent set in a sparse random graph

1 / 20

Finding a maximum independent set in a sparse random graph - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Finding a maximum independent set in a sparse random graph. Uriel Feige and Eran Ofek. Max Independent Set. Largest set of vertices that induce no edge. NP-hard, even to approximate. NP-hard on planar graphs.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Finding a maximum independent set in a sparse random graph' - stian

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Finding a maximum independent set in a sparse random graph

Uriel Feige and Eran Ofek

Max Independent Set

Largest set of vertices that induce no edge.

• NP-hard, even to approximate.
• NP-hard on planar graphs.
• Polynomial time algorithms on “simple” graphs: trees (greedy), graphs of bounded treewidth (dynamic programming).
Complexity on most graphs
• On random graphs, no polynomial time algorithm is known to find max-IS.
• Holds for all densities except for extremely sparse or extremely dense graphs.
• “Best” algorithmic lower bound – greedy.
• “Best” upper bound – theta function.
Planted models
• Model the case that a graph happens to have an exceptionally large IS.
• Random graph with edge probability d/n.
• All edges within a random set S of vertices are removed.
• When d|S| > n log n, the set S is likely to be the maximum IS.
Some known results
• When d=n/2, can find S of size [Alon, Krivelevich, Sudakov 1998].
• Can also certify maximality, and handle semirandom graphs [Feige, Krauthgamer 2000].
• When d=log n, can find S of size , even in semirandom graphs, up to the point when it becomes NP-hard [Feige, Kilian 2001]
Our results

Allow d to be (a sufficiently large) constant.

W.h.p., the random graph) has no independent set larger than n (log d)/d.

Plant S of size

We find max independent set in polynomial time.

New aspect: S is not the max-IS. Complicates analysis.

Some related work
• Many of the techniques in this area were initiated in work of Alon and Kahale (1997) on coloring.
• Amin Coja-Oghlan (2005): finds a planted bisection in a sparse random graph. The min bisection is not the planted one. Amin’s algorithm is based on spectral techniques and certifies minimality.
Greedy algorithm
• Select vertex i to put in solution (e.g., vertex i may be vertex of degree 0, degree 1, or of lowest degree).
• Remove neighbors of i.
• Repeat on G – i – N(i).
Simplify analysis

2-stage greedy

• Select an independent set I.
• Remove neighbors of I.
• Finish off by exact algorithm.

Last stage takes polynomial time if G-I-N(I) has “simple” structure.

Required properties of I

Partition graph into Independent, Cover and Undecided.

• No edge within I.
• No edge between I and U.
• Every vertex of C must have at least one neighbor in I.

Note: U is then precisely V(G) – I – N(I).

How we select I

Initialization. Threshold t = d(1 - |S|/2n) < d.

• Put vertices of degree lower than t in I.
• Put vertices of degree higher than t in C.

Iteratively, move to U:

• Vertices of I with neighbors in I or U.
• Vertices of C with < 4 neighbors in I.
Theorems for planted model

Lem: S highly correlated with max-IS.

Lem: Low degree highly correlated with S.

Thm: I is contained in max-IS.

(Difficulty in proof: max-IS is not known not only to the algorithm, but also in analysis.)

Thm: G(U) has simple structure.

Algorithm for G(U)

Iteratively

• Move vertices of degree 0 to I.
• Move vertices of degree 1 to I, and their neighbors to C.

Use exhaustive search to find maximum IS in each of the remaining connected components.

Thm: CC of 2-core have size < O(log n).

Why did we consider 2-core?

Asymmetry: vertices of S enter U more easily than vertices of V-S.

A tree might have most its vertices from S.

In a cycle, at least half the vertices must be from V-S.

Easier to show that U has no large cycles then to show that has no large trees.

Conclusions
• Planted model in sparse graphs, in which planted solution is not optimal.
• Natural algorithm provably finds max-IS in planted model. (All difficulties are hidden in the analysis.)
• Improve tradeoff between d and |S|.
• Output matching upper bound on |max-IS|.