290 likes | 306 Views
Explore the privatization bid for SIDOR, analyzing its history, industry fundamentals, DCF model, risks, and valuation. Learn about bid amounts and additional sources of value.
E N D
Privatization ofSiderurgica del Orinoco John Blake Ken McNish Sean O’Brien Phil Thorogood Lew Zaretzki
Overview • SIDOR’s History • Industry Fundamentals • Basic DCF Model • Risks and Discount Rates • Amounts Bid • Our Valuation • Additional Sources of Value
Overview • SIDOR’s History • Industry Fundamentals • Basic DCF Model • Risks and Discount Rates • Amounts Bid • Our Valuation • Additional Sources of Value
SIDOR’s History • 1926 Cerro el Pao iron mines discovered • 1955 Siderurgical plant constructed • 1964 State-owned SIDOR is established • 1972 Capacity is 1.2 million tons • 1989 Capacity is 3.0 million tons • 1997 Gov’t announces privatization
SIDOR’s History • Two types of basic steel products are produced: “flat” and “long” • SIDOR is attractive due to: • proximity to iron mine • access to cheap hydroelectric power and natural gas • Production costs are 26% lower than in US
Overview • SIDOR’s History • Industry Fundamentals • Basic DCF Model • Risks and Discount Rates • Amounts Bid • Our Valuation • Additional Sources of Value
Industry Fundamentals • Global forces are driving consolidation within the region • Strong customer relationships, natural geographic barriers and cultural aspects supported segmentation... • But, threat from international producers and effect of recent privatizations are spurring competition and rationalization of capacity
Industry Fundamentals • SIDOR is last significant producer to be privatized • Its cost advantages are attractive in a mature industry • Strategically attractive to regional rivals
Industry Fundamentals What is fair value?
Overview • SIDOR’s History • Industry Fundamentals • Basic DCF Model • Risks and Discount Rates • Amounts Bid • Our Valuation • Additional Sources of Value
Basic DCF Model $US millions 1998 Price per ton $ 310 Volume (thousands of tons) 3,000 Revenue $ 930 Fixed Costs 120 Variable Costs 727 Total Costs 847 EBITDA $ 83 Debt Service (87) Taxes (21) Capex (130) Cash Flows to Equity $ (155)
Available Commodity prices Production targets Projected margins Capital expenditures Debt terms Assumed Product mix Cost structure Taxes Capex timing Basic DCF Model
Overview • SIDOR’s History • Industry Fundamentals • Basic DCF Model • Risks and Discount Rates • Amounts Bid • Our Valuation • Additional Sources of Value
Systematic expropriation inflation wage/price controls exchange controls political instability extra-sovereign risks Project-specific price level volume demanded achieve operating improvements disputes among partners leverage Risks and Discount Rates
Goldman Country Spread: 13.3% ICCRC Adjusted: 32.7% Risks and Discount Rates
Overview • SIDOR’s History • Industry Fundamentals • Basic DCF Model • Risks and Discount Rates • Amounts Bid • Our Valuation • Additional Sources of Value
Amounts Bid Amount Bid Bidder ($billions) Amazonia Consortium $ 1.2 Aceros del Orinoco 1.1 Ispat 1.0
Overview • SIDOR’s History • Industry Fundamentals • Basic DCF Model • Risks and Discount Rates • Amounts Bid • Our Valuation • Additional Sources of Value
Our Valuation Bid $ 1.20 ($billions) Goldman ICCRC Spread Model Model Our Valuation 0.67 0.10 Implied Real Option 0.53 1.10
Overview • SIDOR’s History • Industry Fundamentals • Basic DCF Model • Risks and Discount Rates • Amounts Bid • Our Valuation • Additional Sources of Value
Additional Sources of Value • Strategic interests of consortium members • Potential synergies between SIDOR and consortium members • Real options - Further expansion - Flexibility in sources of energy
Conclusion • Some uncertainty can be modeled in a rigorous, quantitative and conceptually sound manner • On the other hand, some uncertainty can only be evaluated in a highly subjective manner
Subsequent Events • SIDOR operated according to projections for first half of 1998 • Venezuela’s oil-dependent economy continued to struggle • Domestic sales fell 45% in 2H98 • Product prices have declined 30% • Annual production has been halved