1 / 19

WP6 Meeting Schedule

stephanie-hull
Download Presentation

WP6 Meeting Schedule

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP6 PresentationPythagorasKarampiperis,WP6 LeaderDemetrios Sampson, CERTH CB RepresentativeAntonis Kokkonos, CERTH WP6 Team MemberAdvanced e-Services for the Knowledge Society Research Unit (ASK),Informatics and Telematics Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH)

  2. WP6 Meeting Schedule

  3. The need for a new generation of Learning Services • Current Knowledge-based Society demands a new model for learning: • No longer tied to school and/or university context • More Integrated into work and other life contexts • Combining formal and informal learning activities • New learning principles have brought: • fundamental changes in the way learning and teaching are conceived not addressed adequately in eLearning so far • Current learning technologies: • Do not address sufficiently the requirements for Lifelong learning (common Competence Models, Assessment Models etc) [TenCompetence DoW pp.10]

  4. The TenCompetence Approach • Support • Individuals • groups • organizations • In • Lifelong competence development • By • Pedagogical Models • Organizational Processes • Technological infrastructure • Using • Open-source, standards-based technology [TenCompetence DoW pp. 5, 10]

  5. Relation between Core Functional Services refer to WP 8 WP 7 use WP 6 populated with WP 5

  6. Decisions in each Layer Suggest appropriate Network Select suitable Programme Select suitable Unit of Learning (Scenario) Select appropriate Resources

  7. Action Cycle for Lifelong Competence Development suitability estimation suitability estimation Desirable Competences Network Competence Programme suitability estimation define Units of Learning Competence Records performance assessment suitability estimation compared with Runtime Knowledge Resources Learning Activities Competence Development Plan compared with

  8. Links Between Existing Specifications This specification supports ONLY the qualitative (text-based) description of a SKILL and NOT the proficiency level of a skill desirable competencies definition IMS RCDEO IMS-LIP complex competences definition IMS LD Suitability Estimation of: 1. Units of Learning 2. Knowledge Resources IMS RCDEO performance assessment performance assessment IMS QTI IEEE LOM This specification DOES NOT support the description of the Working Flow of an Assessment Process There is NO FORMAL Link between Learning content/activities with competency information.

  9. Open Questions for Models supporting Lifelong Competency Development • Q1: How to model a competence ? • Generation of reusable competence definitions • Q2: How to record the existence of a competence? • Generation of reusable learner or group of learner records • Q3: How to measure learner’s or group of learners competence level? • Competence Assessment Model • Q4: How to estimate the suitability of Programmes/UoLs/ Resources in respect to a specific competency for a specific learner or group of learners? • Learning Path Description Specification with link to Competences • Unit of Learning / Knowledge Resource Description Specification with link to Competences

  10. Open Questions & Work Packages

  11. WP6 relation with other WPs WP2: Use Cases WP7: Competence Development Programmes addressing needs of based on WP6 populated with WP5: Knowledge Resources delivered through Scenarios WP4: TenCompetence Pilots using using Tools WP3: Communication and Collaboration Services Specifications for connection with

  12. WP6 Internal Structure connected with T3: Assessment Model T1: Units of Learning assessed through use played in designed with T2: Authoring Tools T2: Runtime Engines T6: UoL Quality Rating use validated through validated through T5: Usability Test T4: Services Connection Protocol

  13. WP6 18M Effort Distribution (MMs)

  14. WP6 18M Effort Distribution (MMs)Proposed Task Allocation

  15. WP6 18M Proposed Task Plan

  16. WP6 1st Year TargetedSuccess Criteria • 1st Y Required Assessment Protocol (TAP) points = 3.75

  17. WP6 18M Open Issues • Units of Learning (Scenarios) • Bridge with WP2 Use Cases • Bridge with WP5 Knowledge Resources • Connection Protocol • Bridge with WP3 Services • Bridge with WP5 Tools • UoL Quality Rating • Bridge with WP7 Competence Development Programmes

  18. WP6 Action Plan until Jan. Meeting • Each partner approve: • distribution of effort across WP6 tasks • Each partner prepare: • description of 18m work for each task • a short presentation on WP6 involvement • OUNL: • Prepare a briefing document on the Assessment Model (open problems and/or problems occurred) • UPF (as WP4 Leaders): • Prepare a briefing document for discussion on the Units of Learning (Scenarios) requirements for the TenCompetence pilots • CERTH: • Prepare an analytic task plan and timetable for 1st Year WP6 activities with issues to be investigated, analyzed and solved

More Related