1 / 5

Consolidated Use Cases for VoIP in SPEERMINT IETF Draft

This document outlines the consolidated use cases for Voice over IP (VoIP) within the SPEERMINT framework, detailing significant updates across multiple draft versions since IETF 71. Key improvements include clarification of LUF and LRF roles, incorporation of feedback from community members, and the addition of sample protocol messages. Updates have addressed previous template issues, revised terminology, and eliminated outdated use cases. All changes aim to enhance reference architecture and communication standards in VoIP peering, ensuring clarity and accuracy in implementation.

stacy
Download Presentation

Consolidated Use Cases for VoIP in SPEERMINT IETF Draft

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SPEERMINTIETF 72 - Dublin draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases Presenter: Adam Uzelac – Global Crossing - Editor (Yiu Lee – Comcast - also an Editor)

  2. Status • Three releases since IETF 71 • First was -06 • Separated LUF/LRF provider and I-SSP • Added sample protocol messages for two use cases • Addressed the MS-Word template issues • Removed the hub-and-spoke use case • Updated all diagrams to reflect the changes • Cleanup the terms following the terms defined in term-draft-16 • Then -07 • Clarification on LUF and LRF • Then -08 • Incorporated NITS feedback from Alex, John and Hadriel

  3. Version -09 • Missed the submission deadline, but posted to the list. • Updated the Abstract to state that this draft captures the current use cases. We removed the statement "This document captures them to provide a reference". • Moved all the references to the Individual Draft to Informative References. • Added Term Draft in the Terminology Section • Re-draw the Reference Architecture Diagram to respond to John's comment • Re-worded Section 4 to respond to John's and Jean-Francois's comment • Corrected all the ENUM entries • Added all the changes addressed by John and Alex • Replaced the text in Section Static Indirect Peering Use Case with Jean-Francois's proposed text • Added References for DNS-SRV and DNS-NAPTR • Removed Section 7 Federations completely

  4. Questions and Comments?

  5. Special thanks to… • John Elwell, Jean-Francois Mule, Alex Mayrhofer, Hadriel Kaplan, Jason Livingood, David Schwartz, Daryl Malas, Otmar Lendl • This is the group of folks that provided feedback – THANK YOU!!!

More Related