1 / 21

PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 17

PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 17. Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho. Lecture 17 Outline. Lecture 16 Review Relational Research Sampling Research Ethics Writing Research Proposal The Art of Peer Review Addressing Reviewer’s Comments. Ethics associated with Human Subjects.

stacey
Download Presentation

PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 17

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PSYC512: Research MethodsLecture 17 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho PSYC512: Research Methods

  2. Lecture 17 Outline • Lecture 16 Review • Relational Research • Sampling • Research Ethics • Writing Research Proposal • The Art of Peer Review • Addressing Reviewer’s Comments PSYC512: Research Methods

  3. Ethics associated with Human Subjects • The unspoken subject-experimenter contract • Subject expectation is that experimenter will • give clear instructions • ensure safety & warn of dangers • inform subjects of the nature of the experiment • Experimenter expectation is that subjects will • cooperate • be honest (faithful) • In psychology, subjects frequently see experimenter not as a scientist but rather as a therapist PSYC512: Research Methods

  4. Institutional Ethical Oversight • Institutional Review Board • research must be approved prior to conducting the research • approval does not lesson responsibility of the experimenter • Federal Review may also occur for projects receiving federal funding (e.g., NIH, NIMH) PSYC512: Research Methods

  5. Basic Ethical Principles • Minimize harm to participants • Informed consent • Freedom to withdraw • Protection from harm • Confidentiality • Maximize benefit to science PSYC512: Research Methods

  6. Informed Consent • Ss should be given a description of what they will do and possible problems (and detrimental effects), the purpose of the experiment • Ss must sign a consent form that describes risks or discomforts and explicitly states that • participation is voluntary • the subject may withdraw at any time without penalty • responses are confidential or anonymous • Deception • “cover story” used to minimize reactivity to experimental procedures • if used must provide a full debriefing! PSYC512: Research Methods

  7. The Debriefing • As a part of informed consent, subjects should be told of the full nature of the study • Especially important if study causes temporary detrimental effects or uses deception • Goal: identify and remove misunderstandings • Opportunity to collect additional data • Opportunity to educate PSYC512: Research Methods

  8. Freedom to Withdraw • Ss must be allowed to withdraw from an experiment at any time • Ss must KNOW they have the freedom to withdraw PSYC512: Research Methods

  9. Protection from Harm • Experiments that subject Ss to any risk require very strong justification • Experimenters’ responsibility to anticipate risks and take measures to minimize risks PSYC512: Research Methods

  10. Confidentiality • Information given by or collected from Ss should be kept confidential • Sometimes confidentiality conflicts with protection from harm • Easiest manner to insure confidentiality is to collect data in a manner that makes the data anonymous • Maintaining confidentiality • Data security • Keep information coding identity separate from the data itself PSYC512: Research Methods

  11. Maximizing benefit to science • Minimize waste by using pilot studies • insure equipment and stimulus materials are appropriate and working correctly • eliminate bugs from data collection and data reduction (analysis) • Make sure your measures are reliable PSYC512: Research Methods

  12. Writing a Research Proposal • Purpose of Research Proposal • Presents a literature review that defines the concepts and intervening variables pertinent to a particular research question • Presents a specific research question with explicit hypotheses to be tested • Develops a plan for addressing that research question empirically, including descriptions of • Target population and subject sampling • The research design, including explicit definition of independent and dependent variables and how the stimuli and procedures implement these variables • Aspects of stimuli and procedures that help to control for extraneous variables and confounding variables • Types of analyses to be used, predicted results, and how these predictions relate to the hypotheses PSYC512: Research Methods

  13. Research Proposals: Global Concerns • Scientific Writing Style • Precision more important than entertainment, but… • Research is part science and part advertising – not only do you need to develop good ideas but you must be able to sell your ideas • Proposal is often the basis of first impression for the quality of the research project • Proposal must be clear on ALL levels of analysis • Words • Sentences • Paragraphs OUTLINE! • Sections PSYC512: Research Methods

  14. Research Proposals: Global Concerns • APA guidelines • Orderly expression of ideas - organization • Smoothness of expression - transitions • Economy of expression - concise language • Precision and clarity – use scientific vocabulary “jargon” correctly and insure that all terms are defined the first time they are used PSYC512: Research Methods

  15. Organization of a Research Proposal – USE APA STYLE! • Title Page – title should specifically describe what the paper is about so that it is useful information for other researchers’ literature searches • Abstract • essentially a mini-paper for lit. searches • be extremely CONCISE! (< 150 words) • introduce specific topic • discuss variables, etc. • present major results (no statistics!) • discuss important conclusions PSYC512: Research Methods

  16. Organization of a Research Proposal – USE APA STYLE! • Introduction • Purpose • Demonstrate knowledge of relevant research • Define intervening variables and their relation to manipulations and measurements used in previous reserach • Present and justify research question and hypotheses • Present and justify the general method to be used • Organization • Start broad then narrow to your general purpose • Discuss only relevant research in a logical flow • Near the end provide an explicit statement of hypotheses and an overview of the general research design PSYC512: Research Methods

  17. Organization of a Research Proposal – USE APA STYLE! • Method • explicitly state how variables are manipulated • define in separate sub-sections • Participants (subjects) • Design • Stimuli/Apparatus/Materials • Procedures • Results • scales of IVs and DVs • transformations of DVs • list analyses you plan to perform • summarize predictions PSYC512: Research Methods

  18. Things to Avoid: Brian’s Proposal Pet Peeves • Use of informal language: e.g., you don’t “run” subjects, you test subjects • Ambiguous pronouns: if you use the word “it” make sure the surrounding context makes the meaning of the word “it” obvious, otherwise avoid using it (as in “it”) • Sexist pronouns (he vs. she) – word sentences to avoid having to use these if at all possible, or use “he or she” • Verb tense • Introduction Section: discussion of specific previous research  past tense, ideas or concepts that are general for all time and not linked to past present tense • Method and results: future tense • Plural/singular mismatches • Passive voice – word sentences in active voice • Superfluous, imprecise language (e.g., avoid vague adverbs—search for all words ending in “ly” and consider eliminating them) • Style issues like “that” vs. “which” PSYC512: Research Methods

  19. The Art of Peer Review • Example review available online in lecture schedule • Goal: Assist author in improving the clarity and impact of the paper (or proposal) by offering specific constructive criticism (no name calling!) and complements (where appropriate) • Structure • Summary • Major (or general) criticisms (typically <=3) • Minor (specific) criticisms (any number, specifically listed by page and line number) PSYC512: Research Methods

  20. Addressing Reviewer’s Comments • Never blame a reviewer for a negative review • Consider all criticism as constructive—the reviewer is trying to help you! • Assume misunderstandings are your fault, not the reviewers. All misunderstandings occur because you did not write clearly enough • The cover letter (required with submission of revised proposal) • Specifically responds to the reviewers comments by • describing specific changes made in the paper to address criticisms • Presenting a rationale for why a reviewer’s criticism was not addressed • Must be worded very diplomatically! PSYC512: Research Methods

  21. Presenting Research • Time-allotted: 20 minutes  strictly enforced! • Use same general format as the written report • introduction (roughly 10 minutes) • method (roughly 8 minutes) • Summary (2 minutes or so) • Given time allotted you cannot go into the same level of detail as your written report • Materials • Talk from an outline of points you wish to make • Visual Aids  power point • Elements of Style • PRACTICE YOUR PRESENTATION! • Anticipate questions and how you will answer them PSYC512: Research Methods

More Related