E N D
1. Class IX AdversePossession of Chattels Prof. David Glazier
Sep 21, 2006
2. Overview of Todays Class Adverse Possession:
Some additional points on real property
- Disability
- Possession against the government
Adverse possession of chattels
- OKeeffe v. Snyder
Reading for next Tuesday
3. Adverse Possession - Disability IF O disabled when cause of action accrues,
- minority
- mental incapacity
- imprisoned
then statutory period to contest adverse possession is extended
- all states recognize this concept
- timing rules vary widely
4. Disability in California Cal. Code of Civil Procedure § 328:
- If O is minor or insane when gaining title, SOL period does not run:
-- for duration of disability (20 year limit)
-- get normal 5 year period after that
- Imprisonment extension capped at 2 years
Example 1: O age 5 inherits Blackacre in 2000
T begins adverse possession that year
When can T perfect title?
5. Disability in California Cal. Code of Civil Procedure § 328:
- If O is minor or insane when gaining title, SOL period does not run:
-- for duration of disability (20 year limit)
-- get normal 5 year period after that
6. Disability in California Cal. Code of Civil Procedure § 328:
- If O is minor or insane when gaining title, SOL period does not run:
-- for duration of disability (20 year limit)
-- get normal 5 year period after that
7. Disability in California Cal. Code of Civil Procedure § 328:
- If O is minor or insane when gaining title, SOL period does not run:
-- for duration of disability (20 year limit)
-- get normal 5 year period after that
8. Possession v. Government General rule is no adverse possession v. govt
- Old English law barred SOL against king
- American rule often in state constitutions
-- land held in trust for public
-- shouldnt lose by an officials negligence
But some states allow for some or all land
- may be longer SOL
9. Possession v. the Government (Cal) California Civil Code § 1007:
Occupancy for the period prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure as sufficient to bar any action for the recovery of the property confers a title thereto, denominated a title by prescription, which is sufficient against all, but no possession by any person, firm or corporation no matter how long continued of any land, water, water right, easement, or other property whatsoever dedicated to a public use by a public utility, or dedicated to or owned by the state or any public entity, shall ever ripen into any title, interest or right against the owner thereof.
10. OKeeffe v. Snyder (N.J. 1980) The Facts (She Said):
1946: 3 paintings stolen from gallery
- no break-in, no loss report
- limited discussion w/in art world
1972: reported to Am Art Dealers Assn
1975: GOK learns paintings location
1976: GOK demands return
11. OKeeffe v. Snyder (N.J. 1980) The Facts (He Said):
1943: Paintings hanging in Frank Sr. home
- family relationship between Frank & Stieglitz
1965: Frank Sr. gives paintings to son Ulrich
- shown publicly on at least one subsequent date
1975: Frank sells to ? Snyder
12. OKeeffe v. Snyder: Procedural History OKeeffe brings replevin action in March 1976
Snyder responds by:
- asserting rights as purchaser for value ***
- asserting ownership by adverse possession
- impleads Frank as 3rd party ? ***
Trial court gives Snyder summary judgment
- holds SOL started running at date of theft
Appellate Division reverses
- holds adverse possession not proven
-- no showing of open & notorious
13. OKeeffe v. Snyder: Decision Factual disputes require rehearing
Lower courts to be guided by these rules:
Thief cannot transfer good title
Good faith purchaser can get valid title under UCC
- if transferor had voidable title ***
-- paid with a bad check
-- deception as to buyers identity
-- delivery procured through fraud
Discovery rule should apply to stolen art
- IF O exercises due diligence,
- SOL tolled until O learns/should learn location
14. Adverse Possession of Chattels Conceptually same as AP of real property
- SOL often shorter for chattels
States differ on start of SOL period after theft:
(1) conversion rule (date of loss)
- typically tolled if fraudulent concealment
(2) discovery rule (date location discovered)
- either actual or when should have known
- normally requires due diligence
(3) demand rule (date return demanded)
- NY rule in Guggenheim Fndn v. Lubell
15. California Law on Art Theft Cal Civil Procedure Code § 338(c):
. . . The cause of action in the case of theft . . . of any article of historical, interpretive, scientific, or artistic significance is not deemed to have accrued until the discovery of the whereabouts of the article by the aggrieved party. . .
16. Art Theft - a Real Example 1933 Carlotta Landsburg sends art to Paris
1940 Nazis loot Paris art dealer
1970s Marilyn Alsdorf buys painting in N.Y
2002 Art Loss Register identifies true O
- Landsburg heir, UC Berkeley law student
-- coincidently painting at art dealer in LA
- Painting returned to Chicago day of service
State & Federal actions
- ultimately settle out of court for $6.5M
17. Reading for Tuesday Sept 26 Acquisition by Gift
Read introductory material on pp. 157-58
Read Newman v. Bost (pp. 159-65)
Read Gruen v. Gruen (pp. 166-71)
Can skip problems on pp. 158-59 and p. 172