1 / 1

The rise and fall of a multi-modal fertility curve

The rise and fall of a multi-modal fertility curve. What are these graphs? Age-specific fertility rates for first births for women born in specified years (i.e. cohort fertility) What do they show?

sovann
Download Presentation

The rise and fall of a multi-modal fertility curve

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The rise and fall of a multi-modal fertility curve • What are these graphs? • Age-specific fertility rates for first births for women born in specified years (i.e. cohort fertility) • What do they show? • Over successive cohorts the early mode declines, a later mode develops and then become the primary mode; some countries are further along in this process than others • How does the fertility curve change in shape? • It changes from being left-skewed to becoming symmetric or even right-skewed Russia • Are Western European countries different from Eastern European countries? • Yes; the Western countries are further along in the progression • Is the same pattern seen in second order births? • To a much lesser extent; the fertility curve has widened but the development of a second mode is much more muted • Are immigrants, with a younger birth schedule, the primary cause? • Probably not; the most marked development of two modes has happened in Eastern Europe, where immigration is low Lithuania • Are there any outliers in this process? • Yes, the Netherlands, which shows almost no change in the curve over successive cohorts; however, it was seen to happen back in the 1970s (Coleman and Garssen, 2002) • What further work needs doing? • Investigating the two sub-populations at the stage when there are two modes, and explaining their different behaviour trends; why are some early adopters and some later adopters of the new, later fertility schedule? Czech Rep. • The 2-dimensional plots show a cross-over point in the mid-20s; why? • Early fertility rates have fallen; late fertility rates have risen; however, in most countries the fertility rates for some point in the mid-20s has stayed almost constant, the exact age being specific to each country • Technicalities • What is the data source? • The Human Fertility Database; all the European countries which have birth order specific data (currently 15) • How were incomplete cohort fertility curves derived? • The ASTLE method (age-specific trends with limited extrapolation), as described by Myrskylä, Goldstein and Cheng (2013). The 5 year trend for each age-specific rate is extrapolated for a further 5 years, then the rate is frozen • If countries are at different points in this process, can they be ranked in development? • Russia > Bulgaria > Lithuania > Estonia > Slovakia > Hungary > Czech Republic > Slovenia > Sweden > Norway > Portugal > Finland > Switzerland > Austria > Netherlands Sweden Marion Burkimsher

More Related