90 likes | 265 Views
Optimal Patch Choice. MacArthur, R.H. & Pianka, E.R. 1966. American Naturalist 100:603-609. Insectivorous Birds, Mixed Forest Tree Spp Differ as Food Sources Tree: Patch of Habitat Type Consumer: visit how many patch types?. Optimal Patch Choice. Strategy Set: Rank Patch Types 1, 2, …
E N D
Optimal Patch Choice MacArthur, R.H. & Pianka, E.R. 1966. American Naturalist 100:603-609. Insectivorous Birds, Mixed Forest Tree Spp Differ as Food Sources Tree: Patch of Habitat Type Consumer: visit how many patch types?
Optimal Patch Choice Strategy Set: Rank Patch Types 1, 2, … by Mean Hunting Time per Item in Patch Search, Capture, Consumption Decision Set: {1}, {1, 2}, {1,2 3}, etc. Identify by N, Number Patch Types
Optimal Patch Choice Constraints Mean Time/Item Consumed N N = TN + HN for {1, 2, 3 …, N} TN Travel Time/Item Consumed HN Hunting time/Item Consumed
Optimal Patch Choice Exploit {1, 2, …, N}; Add (N + 1)? Objective Function: Total Time per Item Consumed Minimize N
Optimal Patch Choice HypothesizeN : Currency of Fitness Reduced Total Time/Item Consumed Increased Fitness Could Advance Survival, Reproduction
Optimal Patch Choice N+1 = TN+1 + HN+1 N = TN + HN N = N+1 - N = TN + HN Better Strategy if N < 0 Optimal N*: First N where N > 0
Optimal Patch Choice Assume Patch Types Equally Abundant TN < 0 Travel Reduced, Use More Types HN > 0 Add Lower-ranked Types Add (N + 1) if TN > HN Otherwise N Optimal
Optimal Patch Choice Prediction Same Patch Quality (HN), Larger Patches TN and TN Smaller Increased Patch Size Should Decrease Range of Patch Types Exploited