CHAPTER 9: MECHANICAL FAILURE. ISSUES TO ADDRESS. • How do flaws in a material initiate failure?. • How is fracture resistance quantified; how do different material classes compare?. • How do we estimate the stress to fracture?.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
ISSUES TO ADDRESS...
• How do flaws in a material initiate failure?
• How is fracture resistance quantified; how do different
material classes compare?
• How do we estimate the stress to fracture?
• How do loading rate, loading history, and temperature
affect the failure stress?
loading from walking.
• Ductile failure:
• Brittle failure:
• Evolution to failure:
serve as void
304 S. Steel (metal)
316 S. Steel (metal)
TS << TS
• Stress-strain behavior (Room T):
• DaVinci (500 yrs ago!) observed...
--the longer the wire, the
smaller the load to fail it.
--flaws cause premature failure.
--Larger samples are more flawed!
• Elliptical hole in
• Stress distrib. in front of a hole:
• Stress conc. factor:
• Large Kt promotes failure:
• Avoid sharp corners!
• rt at a crack
tip is very
• Result: crack tip
stress is very large.
• Crack propagates when:
the tip stress is large
enough to make:
K ≥ Kc
• Condition for crack propagation:
K ≥ Kc
Stress Intensity Factor:
--Depends on load &
--Depends on the material,
temperature, environment, &
rate of loading.
• Values of K for some standard loads & geometries:
Based on data in Table B5,
Composite reinforcement geometry is: f = fibers; sf = short fibers; w = whiskers; p = particles. Addition data as noted (vol. fraction of reinforcement):
1. (55vol%) ASM Handbook, Vol. 21, ASM Int., Materials Park, OH (2001) p. 606.
2. (55 vol%) Courtesy J. Cornie, MMC, Inc., Waltham, MA.
3. (30 vol%) P.F. Becher et al., Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, Vol. 7, Plenum Press (1986). pp. 61-73.
4. Courtesy CoorsTek, Golden, CO.
5. (30 vol%) S.T. Buljan et al., "Development of Ceramic Matrix Composites for Application in Technology for Advanced Engines Program", ORNL/Sub/85-22011/2, ORNL, 1992.
6. (20vol%) F.D. Gace et al., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., Vol. 7 (1986) pp. 978-82.
K ≥ Kc
• Crack growth condition:
• Largest, most stressed cracks grow first!
--Result 2: Design stress
dictates max. flaw size.
--Result 1: Max flaw size
dictates design stress.
• Material has Kc = 26 MPa-m0.5
• Two designs to consider...
--use same material
--largest flaw is 4 mm
--failure stress = ?
--largest flaw is 9 mm
--failure stress = 112 MPa
• Key point: Y and Kc are the same in both designs.
• Reducing flaw size pays off!
• Increased loading rate...
--increases sy and TS
• Why? An increased rate
gives less time for disl. to
move past obstacles.
• Impact loading:
--severe testing case
• Increasing temperature...
--increases %EL and Kc
• Ductile-to-brittle transition temperature (DBTT)...
• Pre-WWII: The Titanic
• WWII: Liberty ships
• Problem: Used a type of steel with a DBTT ~ Room temp.
• Engineering materials don't reach theoretical strength.
• Flaws produce stress concentrations that cause
• Sharp corners produce large stress concentrations
and premature failure.
• Failure type depends on T and stress:
-for noncyclic s and T < 0.4Tm, failure stress decreases with:
increased maximum flaw size,
increased rate of loading.
-for cyclic s:
cycles to fail decreases as Ds increases.
-for higher T (T > 0.4Tm):
time to fail decreases as s or T increases.