1 / 26

European Venus Explorer

European Venus Explorer. Colin Wilson co - P.I. – Univ. of Oxford & Eric Chassefi ère P.I. – Univ. Paris Sud & International science team & CNES & Astrium teams. An in-situ Venus explorer proposed in Dec 2010 as a Cosmic Vision M3 mission, for launch in 2020 – 2025. Why Venus?.

sofia
Download Presentation

European Venus Explorer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. European Venus Explorer Colin Wilson co - P.I. – Univ. of Oxford & Eric Chassefière P.I. – Univ. Paris Sud & International science team & CNES & Astrium teams An in-situ Venus explorer proposed in Dec 2010 as a Cosmic Vision M3 mission, for launch in 2020 – 2025

  2. Why Venus? • Venus should be the most Earthlike planet we know. • Created at roughly the same time • Apparently similar bulk composition • Almost the same size & density • Similar solar energy input • (due to high reflectivity of Venus clouds). • Early Venus was probably much like early Earth Hot dense atmosphere rich in CO2 and water • Venus also illustrates the probable fate of the Earth. In ~ 1 billion years, with a brighter sun, the insolation at Earth will be similar to that at Venus today. Will we be able to avoid the runaway greenhouse warming that is found at Venus? Need to understand the ‘life story’ of terrestrial planets

  3. Why Venus? • Venus provides the key to understanding terrestrial planets and exo-planets. Venus allows study of the factors determining planetary habitaility: Radiative balance (greenhouse warming, role of clouds) Dynamics (role of super-rotation and equator-pole circulations in re-distributing heat) Evolution of atmospheric composition (surface-atmosphere and atmosphere-space exchanges) Role of magnetic field and solar wind interaction in governing escape rates. Which is the most common outcome for terrestrial planets: Venus-like, Earth-like, or Mars-like? Need to understand the ‘life story’ of terrestrial planets

  4. Why Venus? Venus is accessible! • Short cruise time (5-6 months) • Abundant solar power • Not too far from Earth ( <~1 A.U. distance), good data rate. • Low-cost single-element missions ( <€500m ). • Well-suited for multi-agency co-operative campaign • Balloon mission • Next-generation radar / data relay orbiter • Extensive heritage • Benign cloud-level environment (~20 deg C) • Great test-bed for in situ payloads • Re-fly at Titan, Saturn, Uranus, Mars ...

  5. EVE 2010 A balloon mission in the heart of the habitable layer • Helium superpressure balloon, 53-57 km float altitude. • Benefit from benign climate: 10 – 50 °C, atmospheric densities like those found at 0 to 5 km altitude on Earth. • Explore clouds of liquid water (albeit mixed with sulphuric acid). • Use high winds of 200-250 km/h to circumnavigate the planet in 5-8 days. T. Balint

  6. EVE 2010vs. EVE 2007 • 2007 EVE was for a large multinational mission. • Orbiter + Balloon + Lander • Russia was to provide launcher, lander, and EDLS components • optimistic mass & budget estimates • 2010 EVE proposal was for an ESA-only balloon mission • A more tightly focussed mission, achievable without non-ESA partners • A balloon element only • Cruise vehicle provides data relay during flyby • Thereafter, balloon communicates Direct-to-Earth • More robust treatment of mass, power, and cost. CNES funded a detailed phase 0 mission study in 2009-2010. • Astrium (Toulouse) was subcontracted for aspects of mission design, including entry system and carrier spacecraft.

  7. EVE – Measurement goals • Exploring the cloud-level environment • Chemistry • Microphysical properties • Dynamics • Radiative Balance • Electric properties • Evolution of Venus & its climate • abundances of noble gases (Ar, Kr, Xe, …) and isotopic ratios of light elements (O,C, N …)

  8. EVE – 15 kg science payload • Exploring the cloud-level environment • Chemistry • Microphysical properties • Dynamics • Radiative Balance • Electric properties • Evolution of Venus & its climate • abundances of noble gases (Ar, Kr, Xe, …) and isotopic ratios of light elements (O,C, N …) GC/MS with Aerosol inlet; Tunable laser Spec., XRF Nephelometer p, T, tracking of balloon (winds) 6-ch radiometer (↑ and ↓, λ = 0.25 – 25 μm) Permittivity, conductivity, electric charge of aerosol, lightning Dedicated mass spectrometer with getters, cryotraps Tunable diode laser to resolve ambiguities (e.g. CO vs N2 )

  9. EVE – 15 kg science payload • Exploring the cloud-level environment • Chemistry • Microphysical properties • Dynamics • Radiative Balance • Electric properties • Evolution of Venus & its climate • abundances of noble gases (Ar, Kr, Xe, …) and isotopic ratios of light elements (O,C, N …) GC/MS with Aerosol inlet; Tunable laser Spec., XRF Nephelometer p, T, tracking of balloon (winds) 6-ch radiometer (↑ and ↓, λ = 0.25 – 25 μm) Permittivity, conductivity, electric charge of aerosol, lightning Dedicated mass spectrometer with getters, cryotraps Tunable diode laser to resolve ambiguities (e.g. CO vs N2 )

  10. EVE – 15 kg science payload • Exploring the cloud-level environment • Chemistry • Microphysical properties • Dynamics • Radiative Balance • Electric properties • Evolution of Venus & its climate • abundances of noble gases (Ar, Kr, Xe, …) and isotopic ratios of light elements (O,C, N …) GC/MS with Aerosol inlet; Tunable laser Spec., XRF Nephelometer p, T, tracking of balloon (winds) 6-ch radiometer (↑ and ↓, λ = 0.25 – 25 μm) Permittivity, conductivity, electric charge of aerosol, lightning Dedicated mass spectrometer with getters, cryotraps Tunable diode laser to resolve ambiguities (e.g. CO vs N2 )

  11. EVE – 15 kg science payload • X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer • Current cloud models have only H2SO4 : H2O. • Venera descent probes had XRF which detected S, P, Fe, and Cl in cloud particles. • These measurements need to be repeated! Open University – Beagle 2 XRF

  12. EVE – 15 kg science payload • Polarising nephelometer • Measures scattered light intensity and polarisation as function of scattering angle. • Determine refractive index (constraint on composition) • Liquid / crystalline / amorphous particles • Determine size distribution Characterize cloud microphysics; Search for ‘mode 3’ large particles; Clues to unknown UV absorber Open University – Beagle 2 XRF

  13. EVE – 15kg science payload • Electromagnetic wave analyser and permittivity sensor. • Measure horizontal and vertical electric field ( AC and DC) • Measure perpendicular horizontal magnetic field • also, optical and acoustic lightning sensors Detect & characterise lightning Study atmospheric electrical circuit Sound subsurface using Schumann resonances Grimm et al., LPI 2009

  14. Mission profile • Soyuz-Fregat 21-1b aunch from Kourou, in 2021 or 2023. • Six months for Earth-Venus transfer. • Entry Probe (EP) released from carrier a few days before arrival. • Flyby craft used as data relay during first 2 hours of mission CNES / Astrium

  15. Mission profile • Entry point is visible from Earth and is on nightside. • First 3-4 days of mission are on visible face of Venus • First 2 hours: downlink via flyby craft • Then, direct-to-Earth communications • Next 3-4 days are on far side, not visible from Earth • no data downlink via carrier, but carrier-probe link used for Doppler tracking. (Left) Trajectories of entry probe and flyby vehicle; pale blue lines show probe-carrier line ofsight; and (right) visibility of Sun, Earth, and flyby vehicle from balloon.

  16. Entry System • Total entry mass is 665 kg. • Pioneer-Venus like external shape, with a main diameter of 2.3 m, nose radius of 0.575 m. • Frontshield TPS: Carbon Phenolic (as Pioneer Venus). • Entry System mass : 300 kg including 81 kg for frontshield TPS. ASTRIUM / CNES

  17. Balloon & deployment system • Balloon is helium superpressure balloon, 6.6 m diameter. • Float altitude 55 km (20°C, 0.5 bar). • Builds strongly on French/Russian Vega balloon heritage. • Note that inflation system (gas tank + harness) is 141 kg! CNES

  18. Gondola • Octagonal tube structure is space-efficient, and effectively transfer mechanical loads during entry. • Floating Mass is 159 kg, including • 16 kg helium • 116 kg gondola, incl. 15 kg science payload. CNES / Astrium

  19. Communications system • Low Gain (~omnidirectional) antenna provides only 5-10 bits per second direct-to-Earth downlink. This is insufficient for many science goals. • Options considered included: • Steerable parabolic dish (2 DOF) – mechanically complex, difficult to accommodate • Multi-horn antennae – bulky, difficult to accommodate • Phased antenna arrays in X-band – retained solution • Solution allows > 100bps to 35m Ground Station dishes • 8 phased antenna arrays, 12-15 dBi , Medium-Gain antennae, each array has dimension 100 x 100 mm. • Total mass on gondola is 5 kg, 25 W power consumption • Further optimisation is certainly possible! • e.g. more directional antenna 4x Transmit arrays 4x Receive (and DOA determination) arrays

  20. 100 g balloon-deployed microprobes? Oxford Univ, Qinetiq, ESA

  21. 1-2 kg balloon-deployed ‘Miniprobes’? • Payload as for microprobes, but permitting imaging of surface. Oxford Univ, Qinetiq

  22. Thanks for your attention For further details: C. Wilson et al., The 2010 European Venus Explorer (EVE) mission proposal, Experimental Astronomy, April 2012. DOI:10.1007/s10686-011-9259-9 T. Balint

  23. Lessons learned(about getting entry missions selected) • Like Mars or Earth, Venus has a large and diverse set of environments • Surface, low atmosphere • 50-60 km: sub cloud atmosphere • 60-75 km: Convective cloud layer • Mesosphere , thermosphere, ionosphere... Difficult to satisfy all communities with a single modest mission • Images help to sell a mission • A stand-alone in situ atmospheric mission has short lifetime and small data return • High cost in € per Mbyte • partnering with orbital missions helps to mitigate this. • Much of the understanding of Venus comes indirectly from modelling • Evolution models constrained by noble gas abundances and isotopic ratios • Atmospheric circulation and chemistry models • Radiative transfer / greenhouse models • Interior models

  24. European Venus Explorer – A logical step in Venus exploration • Step 1 (2005-2015) : European Venus-Express mission and Japanese Venus Climate mission Orbiter • Atmospheric and cloud dynamics • (Incomplete) global scale chemistry of the low atmosphere • Step 2a (2015-2025) : in-situ mission, with the use of atmospheric probes (balloons, descent probes) • Venus climate evolution • New data relative to atmospheric isotopic ratios, chemistry of the coupled surface/ atmosphere system, dynamics of the whole atmospheric system. • Step 2b (2015-2025) : Next-generation radar mission • Surface evolution • Landing site characterisaton • Step 3 (2025-2035) : Long-lived landers for the characterisation of the interior structure and dynamics of Venus

  25. Lessons learned?(about getting entry missions selected) So: why wasn’t EVE selected? Reasons include: And, of course, strong competition (47 proposals submitted)! M3 finalists were: • ECHO (Exoplanet Characterisation mission) • Marco Polo – R (Asteroid Sample Return mission) • Plato (Planetary Transit and Oscilliations of starts) • LOFT (Large Observatory For X-ray Timing) • STE-QUEST (Space-Time Explorer and Quantum Equivalence Principle Space Tes) } Finalists in 2007 call

More Related