1 / 57

Analysis of Competitive Markets: Consumer and Producer Surplus

This chapter explores the effects of government price controls on society as a whole, measuring gains and losses through consumer and producer surplus. It also discusses the efficiency of competitive markets and types of market failures. The market for human kidneys is used as an example to analyze the welfare effects of supply constraints.

smccabe
Download Presentation

Analysis of Competitive Markets: Consumer and Producer Surplus

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 9 The Analysis of Competitive Markets

  2. Consumer and Producer Surplus • When government controls price, some people are better off • May be able to buy a good at a lower price • But what is the effect on society as a whole? • Is total welfare higher or lower and by how much? • A way to measure gains and losses from government policies is needed Chapter 9

  3. S 9 Consumer Surplus 5 Producer Surplus 3 D Consumer and Producer Surplus Price Between 0 and Q0 consumer A receives a net gain from buying the product-- consumer surplus. Between 0 and Q0 producers receive a net gain from selling each product-- producer surplus. Q0 QS QD Quantity Chapter 9

  4. Consumer and Producer Surplus • To determine the welfare effect of a governmental policy, we can measure the gain or loss in consumer and producer surplus • Welfare Effects • Gains and losses to producers and consumers Chapter 9

  5. Consumer and Producer Surplus • When price is held too low, the quantity demanded increases and quantity supplied decreases • Some consumers are worse off because they can no longer buy the good • Decrease in consumer surplus • Some consumers are better off because they can buy it at a lower price • Increase in consumer surplus Chapter 9

  6. Consumer and Producer Surplus • Producers sell less at a lower price • Some producers are no longer in the market • Both of these producer groups lose and producer surplus decreases • The economy as a whole is worse off since surplus that used to belong to producers or consumers is simply gone Chapter 9

  7. S B P0 A C Pmax D Q1 Q0 Q2 Price Control and Surplus Changes Price Consumers that cannot buy, lose B Consumers that can buy the good gain A The loss to producers is the sum of rectangle A and triangle C Triangles B and C are losses to society – dead weight loss Chapter 9 Quantity

  8. Price Controls and Welfare Effects • The total loss is equal to area B + C • The deadweight loss is the inefficiency of the price controls – the total loss in surplus (consumer plus producer) • If demand is sufficiently inelastic, losses to consumers may be fairly large • This can have effects in political decisions Chapter 9

  9. D S P0 C Pmax Q1 Q2 Price Controls With Inelastic Demand Price B With inelastic demand, triangle B can be larger than rectangle A and consumers suffer net losses from price controls. A Quantity Chapter 9

  10. The Efficiency ofa Competitive Market • In the evaluation of markets, we often talk about whether it reaches economic efficiency • Maximization of aggregate consumer and producer surplus • Policies such as price controls that cause dead weight losses in society are said to impose an efficiency cost on the economy Chapter 9

  11. The Efficiency ofa Competitive Market • If efficiency is the goal, then you can argue that leaving markets alone is the answer • However, sometimes market failures occur • Prices fail to provide proper signals to consumers and producers • Leads to inefficient unregulated competitive market Chapter 9

  12. Types of Market Failures • Externalities • Costs or benefits that are not reflected in market supply and demand (e.g. pollution) • Costs or benefits are experienced by a third party not involved in transaction • Lack of Information • Imperfect information prevents consumers from making utility-maximizing decisions • Government intervention may be desirable in these cases Chapter 9

  13. S Pmin B P0 A C D Q0 Q1 Q2 Price Control and Surplus Changes Price When price is regulated to be no lower than Pmin, the deadweight loss given by triangles B and C results. Quantity Chapter 9

  14. The Market for Human Kidneys • The 1984 National Organ Transplantation Act prohibits the sale of organs for transplantation • What has been the impact of the Act? • We can measure this using the supply and demand for kidneys from estimated data • Supply: QS = 8,000 + 0.2P • Demand: QD = 16,000 - 0.2P Chapter 9

  15. The Market for Human Kidneys • Since the sale of organs is not allowed, the amount available depends on the amount donated • Supply of donated kidneys is limited to 8,000 • The welfare effect of this supply constraint can be analyzed using consumer and producer surplus in the kidney market Chapter 9

  16. The Market for Human Kidneys • Suppliers: • Those who supply them are not paid the market price, estimated at $20,000 • Loss of surplus equal to area A = $160 million • Some who would donate for the equilibrium price do not donate in the current market • Loss of surplus equal to area C = $40 million • Total ‘producer’ loss of A + C = $200 million Chapter 9

  17. The Market for Human Kidneys • Recipients: • Since they do not have to pay for the kidney, they gain rectangle A ($160 million) since price is $0 • Those who cannot obtain a kidney lose surplus equal to triangle B ($40 million) • Net increase in surplus of recipients of $160 - $40 = $120 million • Dead Weight Loss of C + B = $80 million Chapter 9

  18. The Market for Human Kidneys • Other Inefficiency Costs • Allocation is not necessarily to those who value the kidneys the most • Price may increase to $40,000, the equilibrium price, with hospitals getting the price Chapter 9

  19. S’ S $20,000 C D 8,000 12,000 The Market for Kidneys Price The loss to suppliers is seen in areas A & C. $40,000 D B $30,000 If kidneys are zero cost, consumer gain would be A minus B. A and D measure the total value of kidneys when supply is constrained. A $10,000 Quantity 0 4,000 Chapter 9

  20. The Market for Human Kidneys • Arguments in favor of prohibiting the sale of organs: • Imperfect information about donor’s health and screening • Unfair to allocate according to the ability to pay • Holding price below equilibrium will create shortages • Organs versus artificial substitutes Chapter 9

  21. Minimum Prices • Periodically, government policy seeks to raise prices above market-clearing levels • Minimum wage law • Regulation of airlines • Agricultural policies • We will investigate this by looking at the minimum wage legislation Chapter 9

  22. S Pmin P0 C D D Q3 Q0 Q2 Minimum Prices Price If producers produce Q2, the amount Q2 - Q3 will go unsold. B A D measures total cost of increased production not sold. The change in producer surplus will be A - C - D. Producers may be worse off. Quantity Chapter 9

  23. S wmin w0 C Unemployment D L1 L0 L2 The Minimum Wage Firms are not allowed to pay less than wmin. This results in unemployment. w A is gain to workers who find jobs at higher wage. A B The deadweight loss is given by triangles B and C. L Chapter 9

  24. Price Supports • Much of agricultural policy is based on a system of price supports • Prices set by government above free-market level and maintained by governmental purchases of excess supply Chapter 9

  25. Price Supports • What are the impacts on consumers, producers and the federal budget? • Consumers • Quantity demanded falls and quantity supplied increases • Government buys surplus • Consumers must pay higher price for the good • Loss in consumer surplus equal to A+B Chapter 9

  26. Price Supports • Producers • Gain since they are selling more at a higher price • Producer surplus increases by A+B+D • Government • Cost of buying the surplus, which is funded by taxes, so indirect cost on consumers • Cost to government = (Q2-Q1)PS Chapter 9

  27. Price Supports • Government may be able to “dump” some of the goods in the foreign markets • Hurts domestic producers that government is trying to help in the first place • Total welfare effect of policy CS + PS – Govt. cost = D – (Q2-Q1)PS • Society is worse off overall • Less costly to simply give farmers the money Chapter 9

  28. S Qg Ps D P0 D + Qg E D Q1 Q0 Q2 Price Supports Price To maintain a price Ps the government buys quantity Qg . A B Net Loss to society is E + B. Quantity Chapter 9

  29. Production Quotas • The government can also cause the price of a good to rise by reducing supply • Limitations of taxi medallions in New York City • Limitation of required liquor licenses for restaurants Chapter 9

  30. S’ S PS P0 C D Q1 Q0 Supply Restrictions Price A B • Supply restricted to Q1 • Supply shifts to S’ & Q1 • CS reduced by A + B • Change in PS = A - C • Deadweight loss = BC Quantity Chapter 9

  31. Import Quotas and Tariffs • Many countries use import quotas and tariffs to keep the domestic price of a product above world levels • Import quotas: Limit on the quantity of a good that can be imported • Tariff: Tax on an imported good • This allows domestic producers to enjoy higher profits • Cost to consumers is high Chapter 9

  32. Import Quotas and Tariffs • With lower world price, domestic consumers have incentive to purchase from abroad • Domestic price falls to world price and imports equal difference between quantity supplied and quantity demanded • Domestic industry might convince government to protect industry by eliminating imports • Quota of zero or high tariff Chapter 9

  33. S P0 A B C PW Imports D QS Q0 QD Import Tariff to Eliminate Imports Price In a free market, the domestic price equals the world price PW. Quota of zero pushes domestic price to P0 and imports go to zero. Loss to consumers is A+B+C. Gain to producers is A. Dead weight loss: B +C. Quantity Chapter 9

  34. The increase in price can be achieved by a tariff QS increases and QD decreases Area A is the gain to domestic producers The loss to consumers is A + B + C + D DWL = B + C Government Revenue is D = tariff * imports S P P* B D C A Pw D Q QS Q’S Q’D QD Import Tariff (General Case) Chapter 9

  35. If a quota is used, rectangle D becomes part of the profits to foreign producers Consumers lose A+B+C+D Producers gain A Net domestic loss is B + C + D S P P* B D C A Pw D Q QS Q’S Q’D QD Import Quota (General Case) Chapter 9

  36. The Sugar Quota Example • The world price of sugar has been as low as 4 cents per pound, while in the U.S. the price has been 20-25 cents per pound • Sugar quotas have protected the sugar industry but driven up prices • Domestic producers have been better off and so have some foreign producers that have quota rights • Consumers are worse off Chapter 9

  37. The Sugar Quota Example • The Impact of a Sugar Quota in 2001 • US production = 17.4 billion pounds • US consumption = 20.4 billion pounds • US price = 21.5 cents/pound • World price = 8.3 cents/pound • Price elasticity of US supply = 1.5 • Price elasticity of US demand = –0.3 Chapter 9

  38. Impact of Sugar Quota • The data can be used to fit the US supply and demand curves • QS = -8.70 + 1.21P • QD = 26.53 - 0.29P • This situation led to little domestic supply and most domestic consumption coming from large imports • Government restricted imports to 3 billion pounds raising price to 21.5 cents/pound Chapter 9

  39. DUS SUS Price (cents/lb.) PUS = 21.5 after quota 20 A 16 11 PW = 8.3 before quota 8 4 Quantity (billions of pounds) 1.4 17.4 20.4 24.2 Sugar Quota in 1997 B C D The cost of the quotas to consumers was A + B + C + D = $2.4b. The gain to producers was area A = $1b. Chapter 9

  40. The Impact of a Tax or Subsidy • The government wants to impose a $1.00 tax on movies. It can do it two ways: • Make the producers pay $1.00 for each movie ticket they sell • Make consumers pay $1.00 when they buy each movie • In which option are consumers paying more? Chapter 9

  41. The Impact of a Tax or Subsidy • The burden of a tax (or the benefit of a subsidy) falls partly on the consumer and partly on the producer • How the burden is split between the parties depends on the relative elasticities of demand and supply Chapter 9

  42. The Effects of a Specific Tax • For simplicity we will consider a specific tax on a good • Tax of a particular amount per unit sold • Federal and state taxes on gas and cigarettes • For our example, consider a specific tax of $t per widget sold Chapter 9

  43. S Pbprice buyers pay Tax = $1.00 P0 C PS price producers get D Q1 Q0 Incidence of a Specific Tax Price • Buyers lose A + B B A • Sellers lose D + C • Government gains A + D in tax revenue. D • The deadweight • loss is B + C. Quantity Chapter 9

  44. S2 = S1 + t S1 t P2 Tax shifts S1to S2and output falls to Q2. Price increases to P2. P1 D Q2 Q1 Effect of an OutputTax on Industry Output Price ($ per unit of output) Output Chapter 9

  45. Incidence of a Specific Tax • Four conditions that must be satisfied after the tax is in place: • Quantity sold and buyer’s price, Pb, must be on the demand curve • Buyers only concerned with what they must pay • Quantity sold and seller’s price, PS, must be on the supply curve • Sellers only concerned with what they receive Chapter 9

  46. Incidence of a Specific Tax • Four conditions that must be satisfied after the tax is in place (cont.): • QD = QS • Difference between what consumers pay and what buyers receive is the tax • If we know the demand and supply curves as well as the tax, we can solve for PB, PS, QD and QS Chapter 9

  47. Incidence of a Specific Tax • In the previous example, the tax was shared almost equally by consumers and producers • If demand is relatively inelastic, however, burden of tax will fall mostly on buyers • Cigarettes • If supply is relatively inelastic, the burden of tax will fall mostly on sellers Chapter 9

  48. D S Pb S t Pb P0 P0 PS t D PS Q1 Q0 Q1 Q0 Impact of Elasticities on Tax Burdens Burden on Buyer Burden on Seller Price Price Quantity Quantity

  49. The Impact of a Tax or Subsidy • We can calculate the percentage of a tax borne by consumers using pass-through fraction • ES/(ES - Ed) • Tells fraction of tax “passed through” to consumers through higher prices • For example, when demand is perfectly inelastic (Ed = 0), the pass-through fraction is 1 – consumers bear 100% of tax Chapter 9

  50. The Effects of a Tax or Subsidy • A subsidy can be analyzed in much the same way as a tax • Payment reducing the buyer’s price below the seller’s price • It can be treated as a negative tax • The seller’s price exceeds the buyer’s price • Quantity increases Chapter 9

More Related