1 / 41

Welcome to Donau Chemie

Welcome to Donau Chemie. Pischelsdorf Plant. Active in the Austrian chemical production since 1828 Operating in Europe, willing to install international subsidiaries Since 1997 owned by AfK Organised in Business units Medium sized. Donau Chemie Group. Sicherheit Umwelt Qualität.

slone
Download Presentation

Welcome to Donau Chemie

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Welcome to Donau Chemie Pischelsdorf Plant

  2. Active in the Austrian chemical production since 1828 Operating in Europe, willing to install international subsidiaries Since 1997 owned by AfK Organised in Business units Medium sized Donau Chemie Group

  3. Sicherheit Umwelt Qualität Security Environment Quality Declaration of fundamental Values

  4. Business Units

  5. Positioned in central Europe

  6. Operational since 1917: Gunpowder Sulfuric Acid Refinery Fertilizer Supply of (industrial) customers in central Europe Pischelsdorf Plant

  7. Sulfuric Acid Fertilizer - P, PK, NPK Plaster and Plaster Boards Reactivation of Loaded Carbon Products of the Pischelsdorf Plant

  8. Sulfur NPK-Components Ammonia Plaster Acivated Carbon (loaded) Latex: 1.3 Butadiene Raw Materials

  9. Technical safety: Risk analysis Safety and risk evaluation (What-if-Analysis) technical audits und checks, correctiv action plan Safety organisation: Emergency plan, training plan declaration of responsibilities (authorized people) main training „good production practice“ incident and accident information system How we realize Security Safety concept

  10. Security - Environment - Quality

  11. Ammonia (CAS-Nr. 7664-41-7) R-Sätze: 10, 23 Max. storage capacity: 370 tons 3 storage tanks a 200.000 Liter Seveso II - guidelines

  12. NH3 - storage tank AMMONIA

  13. Industrial fire brigade

  14. A-TEAM Case Study Part 1: A multi-part course on generic hazardous substances management based on material provided by the Lower-Austrian Fire Fighters Academy training program, with additional components on fire protection and fire fighting based on recently developed conventional training material by the authors (Roth, Hofbauer).

  15. A-TEAM Case Study Part 2: A set of scenarios (Planspiele) combining background information and simulated real-time events for team and leadership training (Einsatzleiter) on emergencies involving hazardous subances including one central, plant specific case based on the emergency plans and accident cases developed under the framework of the Seveso II Directive for the plant’s internal and external emergency plants.

  16. A-TEAM Case Study • Part 1: • Duration of running one course in a small team • was 90 minutes including evaluation questions • (considered too long by participants) •  Course will be split into 3 units. • Evaluation: • Paper based questionnaires; • Built-in differential analysis of tests; • Dynamic log files.

  17. A-TEAM Case Study • Trainee profiles: • Semi-professional fire service within the plant: • these are normal employees with different tasks • within the chemical plants operations, but with • special training for the fire fighting and • emergency response (training of the whole team: • officers, soldiers, specialists) • Similar structure in other DCAG plants: • Opportunities for exploitation (re-use)

  18. A-TEAM Case Study

  19. A-TEAM Case Study

  20. A-TEAM Case Study

  21. A-TEAM Case Study Evaluation used also conventional paper-based questionnaires with a 1-5 scale; Design objective was to make filling the questionnaire within 5 minutes possible. Average grade was from 1.3 (best case) to 2.0 (worst case).

  22. A-TEAM Case Study

  23. A-TEAM Case Study

  24. A-TEAM Case Study

  25. A-TEAM Case Study

  26. A-TEAM Case Study

  27. A-TEAM Case Study

  28. A-TEAM Case Study

  29. A-TEAM Case Study Comparing comprehensive test results BEFORE and AFTER the course: TIME: 301 280 POINTS: 210 270

  30. A-TEAM Case Study

  31. A-TEAM Case Study

  32. A-TEAM Case Study

  33. A-TEAM Case Study

  34. A-TEAM Case Study

  35. A-TEAM Case Study

  36. A-TEAM Case Study

  37. A-TEAM Case Study

  38. A-TEAM Case Study

  39. A-TEAM Case Study

  40. A-TEAM Case Study

  41. A-TEAM Case Study Evaluation based on detailed log files

More Related