1 / 15

Jay Barney’s insights

Jay Barney’s insights. Introduction to topic: Over the past few years there has been growing interest in: (a) phenomenon or (b) theory (set the stage) However (create tension) – define research gap The purpose of this paper is…(address gap), summarize findings.

skah
Download Presentation

Jay Barney’s insights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Jay Barney’s insights Introduction to topic: • Over the past few years there has been growing interest in: (a) phenomenon or (b) theory (set the stage) • However (create tension) – define research gap • The purpose of this paper is…(address gap), summarize findings. • Organization of the paper (All the above in 1.5 pages).  Exclude literature review and theory section from he intro.

  2. Framing research questions

  3. Framing research questions • Is that interesting? • “It has long been thought that a theorist is considered great because his theories are true, but this is false. A theorist is considered great, not because his theories are true, but because they are interesting.” • Murray Davis (1971) “That’s Interesting! Towards a Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology.” Phil. Soc. Sci. 1: 309-344 .

  4. What makes research interesting? • “A new theory will be noticed when it denies an old truth, proverb, platitude, maxim, adage, saying, commonplace, etc.” • Interesting research, then, constitutes an attack on the taken-for-granted world of its audience • If research does not challenge but merely confirms taken-for-granted beliefs of its audience, they will reject its value, while affirming its truth Google Scholar: 372 cites Web of Science: 188 cites

  5. “What seems to be X is in reality non-X” The index of the interesting

  6. Organization A disorganized phenomenon is organized An organized phenomenon is disorganized Composition Assorted phenomena are composed of a single element A single phenomenon is composed of assorted elements Abstraction An individual phenomenon holistic A holistic phenomenon is individual Generalization A local phenomenon is general A general phenomenon is local Stabilization A stable phenomenon is unstable An unstable phenomenon is stable Function A phenomenon that functions effectively functions ineffectively A phenomenon that functions ineffectively functions effectively Evaluation A bad phenomenon is good A good phenomenon is bad A single phenomenon

  7. A=3.5 A=3.2 A=1.8 Organization • Logistic growth Xt+1 X Xt t

  8. Organization • Logistic growth A=4.0 Xt+1 Xt+2 X Xt Xt t

  9. Chaotic Chaotic Orderly Organization

  10. Co-relation Unrelated phenomena are correlated Related phenomena are uncorrelated Co-existence Phenomena that can exist together cannot exist together Phenomena that cannot exist together can exist together Co-variation A positive co-variation between phenomena is negative A negative co-variation between phenomena is a positive Opposition Similar phenomena are opposite Opposite phenomena are similar Causation The independent phenomenon in a causal relation is dependent The dependent phenomenon in a causal relation is independent Relations among phenomena

  11. Co-existence • How is it possible for actor Kevin Bacon to be linked so closely to every other actor?

  12. Co-existence

  13. Presenting interesting ideas • Articulate the taken-for-granted assumptions of the audience by reviewing the literature of the particular topic in question • Advance one or more propositions denying what has been traditionally assumed • ‘Prove’ by various means that the old routinely assumed propositions are wrong while the new ones you assert are right • Suggest, in conclusion, practical consequences of these new propositions for the audience’s on-going research – specifically how they ought to deflect it onto new paths as a result

  14. Mike Hitt • Compelling theoretical contribution (emphasize in research question) • Good papers start with good theories AND good methods. • Methods – pay attention to construct validity and measurement • Early focus on framing your research in a form of a paper (start with a roadmap/outline) • Define your key constructs early to focus reviewers’ attention on your perspective

  15. Mike Hitt (Cont.) • Hypotheses should have strong theoretical support (steer reviewers to agreement) • Do not take shortcuts in methodology (tempting but painful) • Perfect the paper prior to submission. Make sure that your paper is ready. Must first go through friendly review by your colleagues. • Interesting but also unique and valuable (others should think so too) • Mind where you submit your work (should be peer reviewed) . Not too many options in the A-rate.

More Related