eurisol ds european isotope separation on line radioactive ion beam facility n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
EURISOL DS EUropean Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
EURISOL DS EUropean Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 17

EURISOL DS EUropean Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 121 Views
  • Uploaded on

EURISOL. EURISOL DS EUropean Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility. Design Study. THE GOAL Producing an engineering oriented study of the EURISOL Facility and developing prototypes of the most critical parts of the facility itself.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

EURISOL DS EUropean Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Presentation Transcript
    1. EURISOL EURISOL DS EUropean Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility Design Study THE GOAL Producing an engineering oriented study of the EURISOL Facility and developing prototypes of the most critical parts of the facility itself. “Starting point: EURISOL RTD Recommendations” Management Support Team (core staff) Technical Coordinator: John Cornell Scientific liaison Office: A. Andrighetto M. Comunian ……. Administrative Office: R. Battistella V. Vandevoorde ……. THE MANAGEMENT BOARD Graziano Fortuna: Project Leader Yorick Blumfeld Peter Butler Mats Lindroos

    2. EURISOL EURISOL DS EUropean Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility IDENTITY CARD Design Study TASKS:12 (FOUR TOPIC AREAS) PARTICIPANTS:21 GANIL (F), CNRS/IN2P3 (F), INFN-LNL (I), INFN (I), CERN (UE), UCL (B), CEA (F), NIPNE (RO), JYU (FI), LMU (G), FZJ (G), FI (LT), UW (PL), SAS (SK), U- LIVERPOOL (UK), GSI (G), USDC (E), CCLRC (UK), PSI (CH), IPUL (LV), SU MSL (SE) (15 countries involved) CONTRIBUTORS:21 U-FRANKFURT (G), BUDKER (RU) ,VNIIFT (RU), PNPI (RU), ORNL (USA), ANL (USA), KAERI (SKR), TRIUMF (CA), JAERI (JP), SOREQ (IL), U-MAINZ (G), VINCA (YU), KVI (NL), U-SURREY (UK), U-YORK (UK), U-PAISLEY (UK), U-UPPSALA (SE), NSCL (USA), FNAL (USA), INFN-LNS (I), HUG (CH) (13 countries involved from Europe, Asia and North America) PROJECT ESTIMATED TOTAL EFFORTS:(k€) 32.284,3 - FTE 490,45 EU CONTRIBUTION:(k€)9161.9- FTE 113,25 DURATION OF THE PROJECT:48 MONTHS STARTING DATE:END OF JANUARY-BEGINNING OF FEBRUARY 2005 COORDINATING INSTITUTION:GANIL (F)

    3. EURISOL TASKSAND RELATED FOUR TOPIC AREAS Design Study • EURISOL DS Managemt (GANIL/INFN-LNL/CNRS-IN2P3/CERN) • Targets and ion sources (Synergies with neutron spallation sources and neutrino facilities) • Multi-MW target station : mercury converter (CERN) • Direct target : Several target-ion source prototypes (CERN) • Fission target : UCx target (INFN-LNL) • Accelerators (Synergies with HIPPI (CARE)) • Proton accelerator design: the driver (INFN-LNL): • Heavy ion accelerator design: the post accelerator (GANIL) • SC cavity development, prototypes and multipurpose cryomodule (CNRS-IN2P3-IPNO) • Physics, beams and safety (Synergies with EURONS) • Physics and instrumentation (U-LIVERPOOL) • Beam intensity calculations (GSI) • Safety and radioprotection (CEA) • Beta-Beams Aspects (Synergies with BENE (CARE)) • Beam preparation : breeders, 60 GHz ECR source (JYV) • Beta-beam aspects: conceptual design report of the Beta-Beam facility. It includes preliminary studies on modifications of CERN accelerators in case the facility is sited at CERN

    4. EURISOL STEERING COMMITTEE 1 representative of each Participant + Management Board and Chairs of NUPECC, ESGARD, EURONS (all ex-officio) 1 meeting/year INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY PANEL 3 Members – 1 Meeting/year MANAGEMENT BOARD Project Leader + 3 Members MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TEAM 1. Administrative Office 2. Scientific liaison Office 3. Technical coordinator COORDINATION BOARD Management Board + Task Leaders + Coordinators of HIPPI JRA and BENE Network (ex-officio) 2-3 Meetings/year ANNUAL PARTICIPANT MEETING 1 Meeting/year Task 2 Task 3 Task 1 MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE Design Study

    5. EURISOL Where have we got to? Design Study Annex I to the contract and CPF Forms submitted to EC on 30th September, 2004 The “magic words” most frequently used in Annex I: 1. Objectives 2. Milestones 3. Deliverables

    6. EURISOL ANNEX I TO THE CONTRACTLIST OF CONTENTS Design Study 1. Project summary 2. *Project objectives 3. List of participants 4. Implementation plan for the full duration of the project 4.1 List of tasks 4.2 Implementation plan 4.3 *Description of tasks 5. Consortium management activities 5.1 Organisational structure and overall project management 5.2 Potential impact and risks assessment 5.3 Plan for use and dissemination of knowledge 6. Project resources and budget overview 6.1 Personnel effort for the full duration of the project 6.2 Description of other resources needed 6.3 Overall budget for the full duration of the project *Significant reshaping of the related original test of the proposal

    7. EURISOL TASK DESCRIPTION EXAMPLE Design Study Objectives Due to drastically increased radioactive inventory compared to current worldwide RIB facilities, the following list of objectives has been identified that need research and development: 1. Calculation of radiation production and activation. 2. Methods for shielding against prompt radiation and for the containment of activity. 3. Handling of targets and in particular the disposal of spent targets. 4. Conformity of the proposed installation to the legislation. The realization of this task is crucial for the Design Study of the new generation RIB facility in order to characterize the radioactive inventory, to identify the technical challenges, to characterize the safety approval procedures, to estimate the impact of safety and radioprotection issues on the final cost of the installation.

    8. EURISOL TASK DESCRIPTION EXAMPLE Design Study

    9. EURISOL TASK DESCRIPTION EXAMPLE Design Study

    10. EURISOL ANNEX I TO THE CONTRACTASSESSMENT OF RISKS Design Study

    11. EURISOL The Beta-Beam concept Design Study

    12. EURISOL TOPICS OF MAJOR CONCERN FOR THE MANAGEMENTThe upper list regards topics already assessed in Eurisol RTD but they need to be fully explored in this design study Design Study • Layout of the facility • Cost estimation of the facility (better then 20%) • Site options (National Lab., Intergovernmental Institution, Less favorite countries new Lab. • Multi user capability • Cost/benefit of the different technical solutions • Comparison of CW and high duty cycle driver solution 1.Global coherence 2. Synergies with EURONS, CARE (HYPPI), SPALLATION NEUTRON SOURCES 3. Dissemination of results 4. EURISOL DS Web site 5. Outreach activity

    13. EURISOL NEXT STEPS Design Study 6. Tentative dates of the 2005 official meeting - End of May: MB and CB meeting - Mid September: MB and CB Meeting - 30th Nov-3rd Dec: Eurisol Ds week During the week the following meetings will take place: a) MB and CB b) Annual participants meeting c) Steering Committee meeting • Signature of the contract (within the end of the year - Ganil /EC) • Signature of the Consortium Agreement (Participants) • Access to the contract by participants (Ganil- Participants) • Appointment of the Steering Committee Members by Contractors and election of the Chair person (kick-off meeting) 5. Kick-off meeting date: 3/2/2004 Afternoon MB-CB meeting 4/2/2005 SC meeting • Aim of the Eurisol week: • Review and monitor the activities of the year, check the overall project planning, extend the discussion and the confrontation on the achieved results to all community, approve the general lines (technical, scientific and administrative matters) of the yearly reports, discuss and approve the activities planning for the incoming year taking into account the suggestion given by the community