advanced civil litigation
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Advanced Civil Litigation

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 194

Advanced Civil Litigation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 165 Views
  • Uploaded on

Advanced Civil Litigation. Joanne Hames Winter 2014. Introduction. California Supplement Douglass Financial Services Case Class Website: www.deanza.edu/faculty/hames. Advanced Civil Litigation. Civil Lit A: Jurisdiction, pleadings, motion

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Advanced Civil Litigation' - simone-crosby


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
advanced civil litigation

Advanced Civil Litigation

Joanne Hames

Winter 2014

(c) Joanne Hames

introduction
Introduction
  • California Supplement
  • Douglass Financial Services Case
  • Class Website:
    • www.deanza.edu/faculty/hames

(c) Joanne Hames

advanced civil litigation1
Advanced Civil Litigation
  • Civil Lit A: Jurisdiction, pleadings, motion
  • Civil Lit B: Proving the case: Investigation, Discovery and Trial

(c) Joanne Hames

pre discovery procedures
Pre-discovery Procedures
  • Preliminary investigation by each side
  • Pleadings filed and served
    • Summons & Complaint
    • Answer (or Demurrer or Motions)
    • Cross Complaints and Answers
  • Case management or other conferences
  • Possible ADR

(c) Joanne Hames

preliminary investigation
Preliminary Investigation
  • Client Interview
  • Locating and interviewing fact witnesses
  • Locating and interviewing expert witnesses for your client
  • Investigating all expert witnesses

(c) Joanne Hames

the client interview
The Client Interview
  • Be Prepared
    • Find out as much about case as possible before
    • develop interview form or checklist
    • Bender Forms of Pleading and Practice
    • Determine Location
  • Gather forms for client signature
    • Retainer Agreement
    • Releases

(c) Joanne Hames

client interview cont
Client Interview, cont
  • Run conflict check prior to interview
  • Paralegal Role
    • Note taking
    • Written memorandum

(c) Joanne Hames

locating fact witnesses defs
Client

Internet

Social Networks

Commercial Internet Sites

accident reports

court records

DMV

Friends/neighbors

telephone book

county assessor/recorder

Ambulance co.

Advertisements

If a corp: Secretary of

State

Locating Fact Witnesses/Defs

(c) Joanne Hames

court records
Court Records
  • PACER
    • Federal court documents
  • California Courts
    • Individual Court Web sites
    • Lexis/Westlaw

(c) Joanne Hames

interview techniques
Interview Techniques
  • Always Identify yourself and who you represent
  • Prepare ahead of time: have form or checklist
  • Avoid leading questions
  • Take copious notes or with permission, record

(c) Joanne Hames

after the interview
After the Interview
  • Prepare statement for witness signature
  • Prepare memo summarizing findings and observations.
  • Statements under penalty of perjury
    • Not admissible at trial except to impeach

(c) Joanne Hames

rules of evidence
Rules of Evidence
  • Importance to investigation, discovery and litigation
    • Different rules apply
  • Litigation: Must follow all rules of admissibility and be relevant
  • Discovery: Must be relevant and not privileged
  • Investigation: Anything goes

(c) Joanne Hames

evidence
Evidence
  • How you prove your point
    • witnesses
    • records
    • documents
    • exhibits
    • objects
    • photos

(c) Joanne Hames

evidence1
Evidence
  • Direct: evidence the witness personally observed; if believed it proves your point
  • circumstantial: evidence from which an inference can be drawn

(c) Joanne Hames

slide15
FORMS OF EVIDENCE

(c) Joanne Hames

rules of evidence1
Rules of Evidence
  • Federal: In Federal Rules of Evidence
  • State: California Evidence Code
  • Very similar

(c) Joanne Hames

relevance
Relevance
  • All evidence must be relevant
    • tends to prove the point you are using it for
  • Not all relevant evidence admissible
      • privileges
      • probative value outweighed by prejudice of time

(c) Joanne Hames

documentary evidence
Documentary Evidence
  • Authentication/foundation
    • document is what it purports to be (photos, writings, etc.)
  • Self-Authentication:
      • certified copies of public documents/judicial notice
  • Best Evidence rule

(c) Joanne Hames

slide19
ESI
  • Electronically Stored Information
  • Information created or stored in electronic format, including computer generated documents, email, web pages and the like.
  • Law is in transition

(c) Joanne Hames

hearsay
Hearsay
  • Generally discoverable
  • Inadmissible at trial unless it comes under one of the many exceptions.
  • Out of court statement used to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
  • Exceptions:
    • State of mind
    • excited utterance
    • business records

-declaration against

interest

impeachment

(c) Joanne Hames

privileges
Privileges
  • Attorney/client
  • doctor/patient
  • clergyman/pentitent
  • trade secrets
  • government secrets
  • Constitutional privileges
  • Work Product

(c) Joanne Hames

expert witnesses
Expert Witnesses
  • Purpose: Can give an opinion in their area of expertise
  • Paralegal Role:
    • Locating Experts
    • Interviewing
    • Researching credentials
    • Researching prior litigation

(c) Joanne Hames

preserving evidence
Preserving Evidence
  • Integrity of evidence must be preserved
  • Evidence log
  • Preserving potential ESI
    • Litigation holds

(c) Joanne Hames

scope of discovery relationship to rules of evidence
SCOPE OF DISCOVERY-Relationship to Rules of Evidence
  • ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION

Admissible evidence or evidence that might lead to admissible evidence

  • NOT OTHERWISE PRIVILEGED

(c) Joanne Hames

paralegal role
Paralegal Role
  • Preparing for discovery/disclosure
  • Drafting discovery requests
  • Responding to discovery requests
    • Client interviews
    • Document reviews (relevancy & privilege)
  • Reviewing/summarizing discovery responses
  • Drafting and responding to motions
  • Integrating discovery into case management software

(c) Joanne Hames

state v federal
State v. Federal
  • California—
    • CCP §§ 2016.010 et seq
    • California Rules of Court
    • Case Law
  • Federal
    • Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
    • Local Rules of Court
    • Case Law

(c) Joanne Hames

methods of discovery
Methods of Discovery
  • Disclosure (Federal Only)
  • Interrogatories
  • Depositions
  • Requests to Produce
  • Medical Exams
  • Disclosure of Expert Witness Information

(c) Joanne Hames

disclosure v discovery
Disclosure v. Discovery
  • Disclosure
    • Federal Court Only (Rule 26)
    • Automatic exchanges of information
  • Discovery
    • Both state and federal courts
    • Not automatic—requires a request

(c) Joanne Hames

discovery in general
PROPOUNDING PARTY--REQUESTING PARTY

RESPONDING PARTY

DOCUMENTS NOT FILED WITH COURT

PROPOUNDING PARTY KEEPS ORIGINALS

DISCOVERY IN GENERAL

(c) Joanne Hames

forms of discoverable information
Forms of Discoverable Information
  • Testimony of Parties
    • In writing
    • Personal questioning (depositions)
  • Testimony of Witnesses
    • Personal questioning
  • Documents
    • Evidence Code Definition
  • ESI
    • Electronically stored information

(c) Joanne Hames

e discovery
E-Discovery
  • New aspect of traditional discovery
    • Electronic documents
    • Hardware used to create electronic docs
  • New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2006)
  • New State Codes—California Electronic Discovery Act (2009)
    • http://www.nixonpeabody.com/publications_detail3.asp?ID=2815 (See California e-discovery….)

(c) Joanne Hames

slide32
Scope of Cyber Evidence

Digital vs. Non-Digital

Digital

Non-Digital

  • Over 93 percent of all information generated in 1999 was in digital format.

(In Re Bristol-Myers Squibb Securities Litigation 205 F.R.D. 437, 440, fn2 (2002) [citing UC Berkeley Study])

(c) Joanne Hames

slide33
What is potential digital evidence?
  • User-Created Files
  • Address Books
  • Email files
  • Audio/Video files
  • Image/graphics files
  • Calendars
  • Internet bookmarks/favorites
  • Database files
  • Spreadsheet files
  • Documents and text files

(c) Joanne Hames

slide34
What is potential digital evidence?User-Protected Files
  • Compressed Files
  • Misnamed files
  • Encrypted Files
  • Password-Protected Files
  • Hidden Files
  • Steganography

(c) Joanne Hames

slide35
What is potential digital evidence?Computer Created Files
  • Backup files
  • Log files
  • Configuration files
  • Printer spool files
  • Cookies
  • Swap files
  • Hidden files
  • System files
  • History files
  • Temporary files

(c) Joanne Hames

slide36
Where do I look for it?

(c) Joanne Hames

slide37
Where do I look for it?

(c) Joanne Hames

slide38
Where do I look for it?Hardware
  • Stand alone computers vs. Local Area Networks
    • Wired vs. Wireless
  • Printers
  • PDAs; i.e.. Palm, Handspring, CIE
  • Digital Cameras
  • Scanners

(c) Joanne Hames

slide39
Where do I look for it?Storage
  • Hard Drives
    • SCSI and EIDE
    • USB and FireWire
    • Floppy Disks
  • LS120s
  • Iomega media, i.e.. Zip, Jaz, Peerless
  • Memory Sticks

(c) Joanne Hames

slide40
Where do I look for it?Storage (cont’d)
  • CDs
  • DVDs
  • Backup Tape

(c) Joanne Hames

slide41
Data StorageHard Drives

Data is stored on the surface of a platter in sectors and tracks. Tracks are concentric circles, and sectors are pie-shaped wedges on a track, like this:

(c) Joanne Hames

slide42
Data StorageFloppy Disks

The computer program passes an instruction to the computer hardware to write a data file on a floppy disk, which is very similar to a single platter in a hard disk drive except that it is spinning much slower, with far less capacity and slower access time.

(c) Joanne Hames

e discovery issues
E-Discovery Issues
  • Does it exist
  • Is it discoverable
  • Who pays for the discovery
  • Is it admissible at trial

(c) Joanne Hames

is esi discoverable
Is ESI discoverable?
  • Rule 26 expressly includes ESI as being subject to disclosure and discovery
  • Relevant—or leads to admissible evidence

(c) Joanne Hames

slide45
Cost
  • Often a contentious issue
  • Court ultimately can decide
  • Zubalake cases

(c) Joanne Hames

discoverable information admissibility at trial
Discoverable Information: Admissibility at trial
  • Discoverable does not equal admissible
  • Requires foundation
    • Authentication
    • Best evidence rule
    • reliable

(c) Joanne Hames

mutual disclosure rule 26
MUTUAL DISCLOSURERULE 26
  • INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  • DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS
  • PRETRIAL DISCLOSURES

(c) Joanne Hames

pretrial disclosures
PRETRIAL DISCLOSURES
  • NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE OF EACH WITNESS AND WHETHER THEY WILL BE CALLED
  • WITNESSES THROUGH DEPOS AND COPY OF TRANSCRIPT
  • IDENTIFICATION OF EACH DOCUMENT OR OTHER EXHIBIT TO BE OFFERED

(c) Joanne Hames

initial disclosures
INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  • NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE OF ANYONE LIKELY TO HAVE RELEVANT AND DISCOVERABLE INFO.
  • COPY OR DESCRIPTION OF ALL DOCUMENTS OR OTHER TANGIBLE THINGS IN PARTY’S CONTROL

(c) Joanne Hames

initial disclosures cont
INITIAL DISCLOSURES (CONT.)
  • COMPUTATION OF DAMAGES CLAIMED
  • COPIES OF INSURANCE AGREEMENTS
  • See File: Initial Disclosure…..

(c) Joanne Hames

expert disclosure
EXPERT DISCLOSURE
  • STATEMENTS OF OPINIONS
  • BASIS FOR OPINION
  • DATA RELIED UPON FOR OPINION
  • EXHIBITS TO BE USED AS SUMMARY
  • QUALIFICATIONS: PUBLICATIONS WITHIN LAST 10 YEARS
  • COMPENSATION
  • OTHER CASES WITHIN FOUR YEARS

(c) Joanne Hames

rule 26 and e discovery
Rule 26 and E-discovery
  • Now uses term: "electronically stored information” (ESI)
  • Provision deals with excuse because of undue burden in accessing information
  • Provision regarding maintaining confidentiality

(c) Joanne Hames

e discovery1
E-Discovery

(c) Joanne Hames

form of disclosures
FORM OF DISCLOSURES
  • WRITING
  • SIGNED BY ONE ATTORNEY OF RECORD
  • SERVED
  • FILED WITH COURT
  • SIGNATURE CONSTITUTES VERIFICATION

(c) Joanne Hames

discovery methods
DISCOVERY METHODS
  • Depositions
  • Interrogatories
  • Request for Production or Inspection
  • Request for Physical or Mental Exam
  • Request for Admissions
  • Disclosure of Experts

(c) Joanne Hames

privileges1
ATTORNEY/CLIENT

MD./PATIENT

CLERGYMAN/PEN-ITENT

SPOUSAL

SELF-INCRIMINATION

GOV’T SECRETS

TRADE SECRETS

WORK PRODUCT

PRIVILEGES

(c) Joanne Hames

sanctions
SANCTIONS
  • MONETARY
  • EVIDENTIARY
  • TERMINATING
  • CONTEMPT

(c) Joanne Hames

timing state
TIMING (State)
  • DISCOVERY MUST BE COMPLETED 30 DAYS BEFORE INITIAL TRIAL DATE
  • MOTIONS TO BE HEARD 15 DAYS BEFORE TRIAL DATE
  • DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS 15 DAYS BEFORE TRIAL DATE

(c) Joanne Hames

timing
TIMING
  • ARBITRATION CLOSES DISCOVERY
  • INFORMAL STIPULATIONS CAN CHANGE

(c) Joanne Hames

discovery requests and responses
DISCOVERY REQUESTS AND RESPONSES
  • PREPARED ON PLEADING PAPER
  • USE CAPTION
  • SERVE COPIES ON ALL PARTIES

(c) Joanne Hames

discovery documents cont
Discovery Documents, cont.
  • Not filed with the court (unless subsequent motion filed.)
  • Propounding party retains originals

(c) Joanne Hames

deposition
DEPOSITION
  • EXAMINATION OF WITNESS UNDER OATH OUTSIDE COURT IN PRESENCE OF COURT REPORTER

(c) Joanne Hames

purpose of deposition
PURPOSE OF DEPOSITION
  • DISCOVERY
  • EVIDENCE AT TRIAL
  • IMPEACHMENT AT TRIAL
  • PERPETUATE TESTIMONY

(c) Joanne Hames

setting up a party deposition
SETTING UP A PARTY DEPOSITION
  • SELECT A LOCATION
  • PREPARE AND SERVE NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  • KEEP ORIGINALS IN OFFICE FILE
  • ARRANGE FOR COURT REPORTER
  • CALENDAR DATE

(c) Joanne Hames

notice of taking depo
Notice of Taking Depo
  • Notice is served on all parties through their attorneys
  • 10 days notice must be given, unless time waived
  • Notice can be by mail, fax, express mail--CCP1013 applies
    • Mail—add 5 calendar days
    • Other Methods—add 2 court days
    • Fax—requires stipulation

(c) Joanne Hames

notice of depo special concerns
Notice of Depo—Special Concerns
  • Videotaping
  • Instant access to transcript
  • Depos of corporations and other entities

(c) Joanne Hames

proof of service
Proof of Service
  • Signed POS (now a JC form) kept with original.
  • Unsigned POS attached to document that is served

(c) Joanne Hames

setting up a non party deposition
SETTING UP A NON-PARTY DEPOSITION
  • SELECT LOCATION
  • PREPARE AND SERVE SUBPENA
  • PREPARE AND SERVE NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  • KEEP ORIGINALS IN OFFICE FILE
  • ARRANGE FOR COURT REPORTER
  • CALENDAR DATE

(c) Joanne Hames

deposition location
DEPOSITION LOCATION
  • WITHIN 75 MILES OF DEPONENTS RESIDENCE
  • WITHIN 150 MILES OF DEPONENTS RESIDENCE IF IN FORUM COUNTY
  • WHEREVER COURT ALLOWS

(c) Joanne Hames

special depositions
SPECIAL DEPOSITIONS
  • DEPOSITIONS ON WRITTEN INTERROGATORIES
  • INTERJURISDICTIONAL DEPOSITIONS
  • DEPOSITIONS TO PERPETUATE TESTIMONY

(c) Joanne Hames

guidelines for depo summary
GET CLEAR INSTRUCTIONS

PARAPHRASE OR QUOTE?

KNOW THE CASE

DON’T EXPECT CONSISTENCY

THINK IN TERMS OF CATEGORIES

INCLUDE PAGE AND LINE

CHECK OFFICE MANUAL

INDEX EXTENSIVE SUMMARIES

UPDATE SUMMARY

GUIDELINES FOR DEPO SUMMARY

(c) Joanne Hames

deposition categories examples
BACKGROUND

EDUCATION

PAST EMPLOYMENT

PRESENT EMPLOYMENT

MEDICAL HISTORY

INSURANCE

PRIOR CLAIMS

FACTS OF CLAIM

INJURIES

OTHER DAMAGES

EXPENSES

PRIOR STATEMENTS

DEPOSITION CATEGORIES(EXAMPLES)

(c) Joanne Hames

interrogatories
INTERROGATORIES
  • Written questions served by one party to another in a civil action
  • Must be answered in writing under oath

(c) Joanne Hames

purpose of interrogatories
PURPOSE OF INTERROGATORIES
  • Form basis of pretrial motions
  • Help settlement
  • Narrow disputed issues
  • Impeachment at trial
  • Discover general information

(c) Joanne Hames

interrogatories content
Interrogatories -- Content
  • General information
  • Party’s factual and legal contentions
  • Factual basis for party’s contentions
  • Description of documents
  • Identity of witnesses

(c) Joanne Hames

interrogatories in superior court
Interrogatories in Superior Court
  • Judicial Council Form Interrogatories
  • 35 Specially Prepared Questions (or more if accompanied by proper declaration.)

(c) Joanne Hames

specially prepared interrogatories
Specially Prepared Interrogatories
  • Limited to 35 unless good cause shown
  • No subparts or conjunctive or disjunctive questions
  • Multiple sets are O.K., but total questions limited to 35

(c) Joanne Hames

contention interrogatories
Contention Interrogatories
  • 1. Do you contend that Dr. Crowley is an agent of defendant St. Catherine’s?
  • 2. If your answer to the above question is yes, please state all facts upon which you base your contention.
  • Or
  • 1. If you content that Dr. Crowley is an agent of defendant St. Catherine’s, please state all facts upon which you base your contention

(c) Joanne Hames

before drafting questions
Before Drafting Questions
  • Know the case and review file
  • List elements of causes of action in pleadings
  • Check form books or other cases in office

(c) Joanne Hames

drafting questions
Drafting Questions
  • Avoid compound questions
  • Use definitions
  • Keep language simple and direct; avoid “legalese”
  • Watch verb tense
  • Avoid “yes” or “no” questions

(c) Joanne Hames

responding to interrogatories
Responding to Interrogatories
  • Answer or object within 30 days
  • Answer should be complete; good faith effort to obtain information except where information is equally available to other side.
  • Answered under oath (verified).

(c) Joanne Hames

drafting answers
Drafting Answers
  • Format: Caption and Introduction should be similar to Specially Prepared Interrogatories
    • Designate Propounding Party, Responding Party and Set No.
  • Preliminary Paragraphs sometimes used:
    • Investigation and discovery are continuing and answers are based on information known to date

(c) Joanne Hames

drafting answers cont
Drafting Answers, cont.
  • Preliminary Paragraphs, cont.
    • All privileges are asserted and not waived
  • Respond to each question separately by number
    • Answer, object or both
    • Objecting—Must state basis
    • If answer unknown—state this, but remember there is a duty to make reasonable inquiry

(c) Joanne Hames

review verify and serve
Review, Verify and Serve
  • Review answers
  • Client verifies
  • Attorney signs (CA: must sign if any objections, but usually does anyway)
  • Serve original answers w. verification and POS on propounding party; other parties receive copies

(c) Joanne Hames

duty to update
Duty to Update
  • Federal rules require
  • California does not require
    • Follow up interrogatories usually sent before trial

(c) Joanne Hames

questions re documents
Questions re: Documents
  • Rather than summarize or compile documents, answering party can allow inspection

(c) Joanne Hames

objections
OBJECTIONS
  • Must be timely
  • Can be to all or part of question
  • Must state basis of objection
  • Must be signed by attorney

(c) Joanne Hames

motion for protective order
Motion for Protective Order
  • Too many questions (more than 35 with declaration)
  • oppressive, annoying questions

(c) Joanne Hames

motions
MOTIONS
  • Motion for Protective Order
  • Motion to Compel Answers
  • Motion to Compel Further Answers

(c) Joanne Hames

motion to compel further answers
Motion to Compel Further Answers
  • If inadequate response or improper objection
  • Notice given within 45 days of service of response
  • Meet and Confer declaration

(c) Joanne Hames

objections1
Irrelevant

More than 35

Annoyance, Embarrassment, Oppressive or Unduly Burdensome

Information equally available

Work Product

Other Privilege

Uncertain, Ambiguous and Unintelligible

Continuing Interrogatories (State Court only)

OBJECTIONS

(c) Joanne Hames

motions to compel further answers
MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER ANSWERS
  • Notice of Motion
  • Declaration in Support of Motion
  • Memorandum of Points and Authorities
  • Meet and Confer Declaration
  • Separate Statement
      • Set forth each disputed question and answer
      • Give legal and factual reason for request

(c) Joanne Hames

physical and mental examinations ccp 2032
PHYSICAL AND MENTAL EXAMINATIONS (CCP 2032)
  • PARTIES SUBJECT TO EXAM:
      • PARTY TO ACTION
      • AGENT OF ANY PARTY
      • NATURAL PERSON IN CUSTODY OR UNDER LEGAL CONTROL OF PARTY

(c) Joanne Hames

parties qualified to examine
PARTIES QUALIFIED TO EXAMINE
  • M.D.
  • APPROPRIATE LICENSED HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER
  • LICENSED CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST WITH PHD AND 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE

(c) Joanne Hames

plaintiff in p i case
PLAINTIFF IN P.I. CASE
  • BY DEMAND WITHOUT LEAVE OF COURT
  • EXAM CANNOT BE PAINFUL, PROTRACTED OR INTRUSIVE
  • CONDUCTED WITHIN 75 MILES OF P’S RESIDENCE

(c) Joanne Hames

demand for physical exam
DEMAND FOR PHYSICAL EXAM
  • SPECIFY TIME, PLACE, MANNER, CONDITIONS, SCOPE AND NATURE
  • IDENTITY AND SPECIALTY OF M.D.
  • SCHEDULED FOR AT LEAST 30 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF DEMAND
  • SERVED ON PLAINTIFF AND ALL OTHER PARTIES
  • NOT FILED WITH COURT

(c) Joanne Hames

plaintiff s response
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE
  • WRITTEN RESPONSE WITHIN 20 DAYS
  • AGREE
  • AGREE WITH MODIFICATIONS
  • REFUSE
  • NOT FILED WITH COURT

(c) Joanne Hames

failure to respond
FAILURE TO RESPOND
  • OBJECTIONS WAIVED
  • CAN BE RELIEVED OF WAIVER BY MOTION
      • RESPONSE FILED
      • FAILURE DUE TO MISTAKE, INADVERTENCE OR EXCUSABLE NEGLECT

(c) Joanne Hames

mental exams and non plaintiff p i physical
MENTAL EXAMS AND NON -PLAINTIFF P.I. PHYSICAL
  • ONLY BY MOTION or
  • STIPULATION OF PARTIES
  • NEED A SHOWING OF GOOD CAUSE

(c) Joanne Hames

sanctions for failure
SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE
  • MONETARY SANCTION
  • ISSUE SANCTION
  • EVIDENCE SANCTION
  • TERMINATING SANCTION
  • WHATEVER COURT THINKS IS JUST

(c) Joanne Hames

a physical exam
A PHYSICAL EXAM
  • CAN BE MONITORED BY ATTORNEY OR ATTORNEY’S REPRESENTATIVE
  • ATTORNEY CANNOT INTERFERE WITH EXAM BUT CAN SUSPEND IT IF VIOLATIONS OCCUR
      • MUST GET PROTECTIVE ORDER

(c) Joanne Hames

mental exams
MENTAL EXAMS
  • NO OBSERVATIONS ALLOWED
  • RECORDING IS ALLOWED

(c) Joanne Hames

report of examination
REPORT OF EXAMINATION
  • COPY CAN BE DEMANDED BY EXAMINEE
  • COPIES OF EXAMINEE’S REPORTS OF SAME CONDITIONS MUST BE EXCHANGED
  • REPORT DELIVERED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REQUEST OR 15 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL

(c) Joanne Hames

requesting documents and other tangible evidence
Requesting Documents and Other Tangible Evidence
  • CCP 2031: Allows inspection of things in control of a party by making a demand/request
  • CCP 2020.410-2020.440 Procedure for requesting business records from non party

(c) Joanne Hames

document production
Document Production
  • Docs in custody of other party
  • Docs in custody of third party
  • Public docs

(c) Joanne Hames

ccp 2031 et seq
CCP 2031 et seq.
  • Demand to produce/inspect/photograph/ test or sample :
    • Documents
    • Photos
    • Any tangible thing
  • In custody, control of possession of a party

(c) Joanne Hames

document production1
DOCUMENT PRODUCTION
  • DEMAND TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS-CCP 2031
  • DEPOSITION SUBPENA FOR BUSINESS RECORDS--CCP 2020

(c) Joanne Hames

ccp 2031
CCP 2031
  • RELATES TO ITEMS IN POSSESSION, CUSTODY OR CONTROL OF PARTY
  • INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS
  • INSPECTION OF TANGIBLE THINGS
  • INSPECTION OF LAND

(c) Joanne Hames

inspection under 2031
INSPECTION UNDER 2031
  • INSPECT
  • PHOTOGRAPH
  • TEST
  • SAMPLE
  • COPY
  • MEASURE
  • SURVEY
  • BY PARTY OR REPRESENTATIVE

(c) Joanne Hames

demand for production
DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION
  • FIRST PARAGRAPH: DEMANDING PARTY, SET NUMBER AND RESPONSIDNG PARTY
  • EACH DEMAND IN A SET TO BE SEPARTELY NUMBERED

(c) Joanne Hames

demand for production c0nt
DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION (C0NT)
  • DOCUMENTS OR ITEMS TO BE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED BY ITEM OR CATEGORY
  • SPECIFY REASONABLE TIME FOR INSPECTION AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN FUTURE

(c) Joanne Hames

demand for production cont
DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION (CONT)
  • SPECIFY PLACE FOR INSPECTION
  • SPECIFY ANY RELATED ACTIVITY (I.E. TEST)
  • SERVE ON ALL PARTIES

(c) Joanne Hames

response to demand
RESPONSE TO DEMAND
  • MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  • WRITTEN RESPONS
    • AGREE TO COMPLY
    • OBJECT
    • STATEMENT OF INABILITY TO COMPLY
    • RESPOND TO EACH ITEM
    • SIGNED BY PARTY UNDER OATH
    • SERVED WITHIN 20 DAYS OF SERVICE

(c) Joanne Hames

failure to file written response
FAILURE TO FILE WRITTEN RESPONSE
  • WAIVER OF OBJECTIONS
  • RELIEVED BY MOTION
  • DEMANDING PARTY MAKES MOTION TO COMPEL (AFTER MEET AND CONFER)

(c) Joanne Hames

motion to compel further response
MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE
  • CONTESTS OBJECTIONS OR STATEMENT OF INABILITY TO PRODUCE
  • MADE WITHIN 45 DAYS OF SERVICE OF WRITTEN RESPONSE

(c) Joanne Hames

motion for compliance
MOTION FOR COMPLIANCE
  • MADE AS A RESULT OF FAILURE TO ACTUALLY PRODUCE

(c) Joanne Hames

deposition of business records ccp 2020 d
DEPOSITION OF BUSINESS RECORDS-- CCP 2020 (d)
  • RECORDS NOT IN POSSESSION OF PARTY
  • DEPOSITION SUBPENA
  • COMPLIANCE NO EARLIER THAN 20 DAYS AFTER ISSUANCE OR 15 DAYS AFTER SERVICE WHICHEVER IS LATER
  • NO DECLARATION OF GOOD CAUSE REQUIRED

(c) Joanne Hames

deposition officer
DEPOSITION OFFICER
  • PROFESSIONAL, REGISTERED PHOTOCOPIER
  • NO FINANCIAL INTEREST IN MATTER

(c) Joanne Hames

delivery of records
DELIVERY OF RECORDS
  • MADE EITHER AT PLACE OF DEPO OFFICER OR
  • INSPECTION TAKES PLACE AT OFFICE OF BUSINESS WHOSE RECORDS ARE SOUGHT

(c) Joanne Hames

delivery of records cont
DELIVERY OF RECORDS, cont
  • COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF EVIDENCE CODE 1560 THROUGH 1563
  • COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF NOTICE TO CONSUMER

(c) Joanne Hames

evidence code 1560 63
EVIDENCE CODE 1560-63
  • CUSTODIAN CAN DELIVER COPY TO DEPO OFFICER WITH PROPER AFFIDAVIT
  • DEMANDING PARTY MUST PAY FOR COPIES (COST PER PAGE AND PER HOUR FOR PERSON COPYING)

(c) Joanne Hames

ccp 1985 3 notice to consumer
CCP 1985.3--NOTICE TO CONSUMER
  • REQUIRED PRIOR TO DATE FOR PRODUCTION
  • SERVED AT LEAST 10 DAYS PRIOR TO PRODUCTION AND 5 DAYS PRIOR TO SERVICE ON CUSTODIAN

(c) Joanne Hames

practical aspects of document production producing party
Practical Aspects of Document Production: Producing Party
  • Organize documents
  • Read and identify documents
  • Code documents
  • Create privilege log

(c) Joanne Hames

request for admissions ccp 2033
REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONSCCP 2033
  • REQUEST TO ADMIT GENUINESS OF DOCUMENT OR
  • TRUTHFULNESS OF FACT, OPINION RELATING TO FACT OR APPLICATION OF LAW TO FACT
  • MAY RELATE TO ANY MATTER IN CONTROVERSY BETWEEN PARTIES

(c) Joanne Hames

admissions
ADMISSIONS
  • 35 QUESTION LIMIT EXCEPT FOR GENUINESS OF DOCUMENTS
  • CAN ASK MORE WITH DECLARATION OF GOOD CAUSE
  • OBJECT TO MORE THAN 35 LIKE YOU DO WITH INTERROGATORIES

(c) Joanne Hames

format of request for admissions
FORMAT OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  • SIMILAR TO INTERROGATORIES
  • JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS OPTIONAL
  • NO COMPOUND QUESTIONS
  • DEFINITIONS O.K.
  • INSTRUCTIONS O.K. IS FOUND IN J.C. FORMS
  • OFTEN ACCOMPANIED WITH SET OF INTERROGATORIES

(c) Joanne Hames

response to request for admissions
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  • 30 DAYS TO RESPOND
  • MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  • ADMISSION/DENIAL/INABILITY TO RESPOND
  • OBJECTION TO REQUEST

(c) Joanne Hames

failure to respond1
FAILURE TO RESPOND
  • RESPONDING PARTY WAIVES OBJECTIONS SUBJECT TO COURT ORDER GRANTING RELIEF
  • REQUESTING PARTY MOVES FOR ORDER HAVING ADMISSIONS DEEMED ADMITTED AND SANCTIONS

(c) Joanne Hames

motion to compel further response1
MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE
  • CHALLENGES OBJECTION
  • CHALLENGES INCOMPLETE ANSWER
  • NOTICE GIVEN WITHIN 45 DAYS OF SERVICE OF RESPONSE

(c) Joanne Hames

motion to withdraw or amend response
MOTION TO WITHDRAW OR AMEND RESPONSE
  • IS ADMISSION A RESULT OF MISTAKE, ETC.
  • COURT CAN GRNT ADDITION DISCOERY AND COSTS

(c) Joanne Hames

effect of admission
EFFECT OF ADMISSION
  • MATTER DEEMED CONCLUSIVELY PROVED AT TRIAL AGAINST PARTY MAKING ADMISSION

(c) Joanne Hames

effect of denial
EFFECT OF DENIAL
  • IF MATTER PROVED AT TRIAL, COST OF PROVING MATTER CAN BE ASSESSED AGAINST PARTY DENYING IT

(c) Joanne Hames

expert disclosure ccp 2034
EXPERT DISCLOSURE(CCP 2034)
  • DEMAND FOR SIMULTANEOUS DXCHANGE
  • MADE NO LATER THAN 70 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL OR 10TH DAY AFTER INITIAL TRIAL DATE SET
  • DISCLOSURE TO TAKE PLACE 50 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL OR 20 DAYS AFTER SERVICE, WHICHEVER IS CLOSER TO TRIAL DATE

(c) Joanne Hames

matters to be disclosed
MATTERS TO BE DISCLOSED
  • IDENTITY OF EXPERTS WHO WILL TESTIFY
  • INFORMATION ABOUT EXPERT
  • COPIES OF EXPERT REPORTS

(c) Joanne Hames

response to demand for disclosure
RESPONSE TO DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE
  • NAME AND ADDRESS OF WITHESS
  • OR STATEMENT THAT NO WITNESS TO BE USED
  • EXPERT WITNESS DECLARATION SIGNED BY ATTORNEY

(c) Joanne Hames

expert witness declaration
EXPERT WITNESS DECLARATION
  • EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS
  • SUBSTANCE OF PROPOSED TESTIMONY
  • REPRESENTATION THAT EXPERT HAS AGREED TO TESTIFY
  • EXPERT’S HOURLY AND DAILY FEE FOR DEPOSITION AND CONSULTATION WITH RETAINING ATTORNEY

(c) Joanne Hames

supplementing and augmenting
SUPPLEMENTING AND AUGMENTING
  • WITHIN 20 DAYS OF EXCHANGE A PARTY CAN ADD A NEW EXPERT AND MUST DISCLOSE
  • AFTER 20 DAYS, PARTY CAN MAKE MOTION TO AUGMENT LIST WITH NEWLY RETAINED EXPERT

(c) Joanne Hames

amending expert list
AMENDING EXPERT LIST
  • MOTION TO SUBMIT TARDY EXPERT LIST
  • FAILURE TO DISCLOSE A RESULT OF MISTAKE, ETC.
  • CANCTIONS CAN BE IMPOSED

(c) Joanne Hames

deposition of expert
DEPOSITION OF EXPERT
  • CCP 2034
  • WITHIN 75 MILES OF COURT
  • EXPERT ENTITLED TO REASONABLE FEE
  • NO SUBPENA NEEDED FOR WITNESS

(c) Joanne Hames

discovery motions
DISCOVERY MOTIONS
  • MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  • MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSE
  • MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE
  • MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
  • MISCELLANEOUS MOTIONS

(c) Joanne Hames

discovery motions1
DISCOVERY MOTIONS
  • DISCOVERY ACT--CCP 2016 ET SEQ.
  • CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT:
      • RULE 301 ET SEQ.

(c) Joanne Hames

general format
GENERAL FORMAT
  • NOTICE OF MOTION
  • DECLARATIONS
  • SEPARATE STATEMENT
  • MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

(c) Joanne Hames

notice of motion
NOTICE OF MOTION
  • NATURE OF MOTION AND GROUNDS
  • BELOW CASE NUMBER:
      • DATE
      • TIME
      • LOCATION OF HEARING
      • NAME OF HEARING JUDGE
      • FILING DATE OF ACTION
      • TRIAL DATE

(c) Joanne Hames

exhibits
EXHIBITS
  • EACH EXHIBIT SEPARATED WITH HARD PAPER OR PLATIC TAB EXTENDING BELOW BOTTOM OF PAGE WITH EXHIBIT DESIGNATION
  • INDEX TO EXHIBITS
  • ENGLISH TRANSLATION IF NEEDED

(c) Joanne Hames

memo of points and authorities rule 313
MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES (Rule 313)
  • Statement of facts
  • Concise statement of law, evidence and arguments
  • Discussion of law
  • Cases--only official cite needed
  • California Style Manual or Bluebook
  • Copies of non-California authorities to be attached (also Calif. Authorities if prior to publication in Advance Sheet)

(c) Joanne Hames

memo of p and a s
MEMO OF P AND A’S
  • 15 page limit for opening and responding memo
  • 10 page limit for reply
  • Memo’s in excess of 10 pages require TOA and TOC
  • Memo’s in excess of 15 pages require summary of argument

(c) Joanne Hames

declarations affidavits
DECLARATIONS/AFFIDAVITS
  • FIRST PERSON NARRATIVE
  • FACTUAL BASIS FOR MAKING OR OPPOSING MOTION
  • MEET AND CONFER REQUIREMENT
  • CAPTION: NAME OF DECLARANT AND IDENTIFICATION OF MOTION IT SUPPORTS OR OPPOSES

(c) Joanne Hames

rule 335 format of discovery motions
RULE 335--FORMAT OF DISCOVERY MOTIONS
  • REQUIRES SEPARATE STATEMENT WHERE FURTHER RESPONSES REQUESTED\
  • INCLUDES REQUEST, RESPONSE GIVEN, FACTUAL AND LEGAL REASONS FOR COMPELLING
      • CAN’T INCORPORATE REQUESTS AND RESPONSES BY ATTACHING DISCOVERY

(c) Joanne Hames

rule 335 cont
Rule 335, cont.
  • ALL INTERROGS, ETC, MUST BE IDENTIFIED BY SET AND NUMBER
  • IF OTHER DOCUMENTS ARE RELEVANT, THEY ARE TO BE SUMMARIZED

(c) Joanne Hames

deposition testimony
DEPOSITION TESTIMONY
  • ATTACH FOLLOWING:
      • TITLE PAGE
      • ONLY RELELVANT PAGES OF TRANSCRIPT WITH PAGE NUMBERS VISIBLE
      • HIGHLIGHT RELEVANT PORTIONS OF TRANSCRIPT

(c) Joanne Hames

proposed order order
PROPOSED ORDER/ORDER
  • FILE AND SERVE PROPOSED ORDER, BUT DO NOT ATTACH TO OTHER PAPERS
  • PREVAILING PARTY ALWAYS PREPARES

(c) Joanne Hames

discovery in limited jurisdiction cases economic litigation
DISCOVERY IN LIMITED JURISDICTION CASES(ECONOMIC LITIGATION)
  • CCP 90 - 100
  • NOTICE AND FORMAT REQUIREMENTS LIKE SUPERIOR COURT

(c) Joanne Hames

discovery in limited juris cases
DISCOVERY IN LIMITED JURIS. CASES
  • PERMISSIBLE FORMS:
      • COMBINATION OF 35 OF: INTERROGS, DEMANDS TO PRODUCE, REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS
      • ONE ORAL OR WRITTEN DEPO
      • DEPO SUBPENAS FOR DOCUMENTS
      • PHYSICAL/MENTAL EXAM
  • EXTENDED BY COURT ORDER OR STIPULATION

(c) Joanne Hames

case questionnaire
CASE QUESTIONNAIRE
  • JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORM
  • DESIGNED TO ELICIT FUNDAMENTAL INFORMATION
  • PLAINTIFF CAN SERVE WITH COMPLAINT, BUT MUST ALSO SERVED COMPLETED COPY

(c) Joanne Hames

request for statement identifying witnesses and evidence
REQUEST FOR STATEMENT IDENTIFYING WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE
  • ANY PARTY CAN REQUEST 45- 30 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL
  • 20 DAYS TO RESPOND
  • COURT WILL EXCLUDE EVIDENCE NOT INCLUDED

(c) Joanne Hames

prepared testimony by declaration
PREPARED TESTIMONY BY DECLARATION
  • IN LIEU OF CALLING WITNESS (LAY OR EXPERT) IF
  • COPY SERVED ON OTHER PARTY 30 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL
  • AFFIANT LIVES WITHIN 150 MILES OF COURT AND ADDRESS IS PROVIDED TO OTHER SIDE AND WITNESS AVAILABLE FOR SERVICE OF SUBPOENA

(c) Joanne Hames

settlement
SETTLEMENT
  • GOVERNED BY CONTRACT LAW
  • DISPOSES OF CASE
  • ALSO KNOWN AS COMPROMISE AND RELEASE (C & R)

(c) Joanne Hames

preparing for settlement
PREPARING FOR SETTLEMENT
  • ORGANIZE FILE AND “SPECIALS”
  • DEMAND LETTERS
  • SETTLEMENT BROCHURES

(c) Joanne Hames

special california rules concerns
SPECIAL CALIFORNIA RULES/CONCERNS
  • CCP 998 OFFER
  • CCP 877.5 --SLIDING SCALE
  • STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT
  • MINORS

(c) Joanne Hames

tort cases settlement and multi defendants
TORT CASES: SETTLEMENT AND MULTI-DEFENDANTS
  • LIABILITY OF JOINT TORTFEASORS
    • COMMON LAW: EACH DEF. LIABLE FOR ALL DAMAGES TO PLAINTIFF
    • CALIF: CHANGES COMMON LAW AS TO GENERAL DAMAGES
      • SETTLEMENT BY ONE DEF CREATES PROBLEMS

(c) Joanne Hames

hypothetical
HYPOTHETICAL
  • P SUES D & E
  • P SETTLES WITH D FOR 100K
  • P GOES TO TRIAL AND GETS JUDGMENT AGAINST E FOR 500K
  • WHAT RIGHTS DOES E HAVE AGAINST D?

(c) Joanne Hames

good faith settlement
GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT
  • GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT BY ONE OF MANY DEFENDANTS RELEASES SETTLING DEFENDANT FROM ALL LIABILITY
  • MUST BE IN GOOD FAITH
  • DETERMINED BY MOTION

(c) Joanne Hames

dismissal
DISMISSAL
  • VOLUNTARY
      • BY PARTIES
      • JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORM
  • INVOLUNTARY
      • BY COURT: DISCOVERY SANCTIONS TIME VIOLATIONS

(c) Joanne Hames

dismissal1
DISMISSAL
  • CLEARS COURT RECORD
  • CAN INCLUDE ENTIRE CASE OR PART OF CASE
  • WITH PREJUDICE OR WITHOUT

(c) Joanne Hames

with and without prejudice
WITH AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  • WITHOUT PREJUDICE--CAN REFILE IF SOL ALLOWS
  • WITH PREJUDICE--CANNOT REFILE; SETTLEMENTS ARE WITH PREJUDICE

(c) Joanne Hames

alternatives to settlement agreement
ALTERNATIVES TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
  • CONSENT DECREE
  • CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT
  • STIPULATED JUDGMENT

(c) Joanne Hames

slide168
ADR
  • BINDING OR NON-BINDING
  • MEDIATION
  • ARBITRATION
  • MEDIATION/ARBITRATION
  • EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION
  • MINI TRIALS

(c) Joanne Hames

pretrial
PRETRIAL
  • SUBPOENA WITNESSES
  • ORGANIZE FILE/EXHIBITS
  • MARK AND COPY EXHIBITS
  • PREPARE TRIAL NOTEBOOK
  • ARRANGE DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE
  • ARRANGE FOR AUTHENTICATION OF EXHIBITS
  • PREPARE PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
  • TRIAL BRIEF

(c) Joanne Hames

settlement conference
Settlement Conference
  • (c) [Settlement conference statement] No later than five court days before the date set for the settlement conference, each party must submit to the court and serve on each party a mandatory settlement conference statement containing a good faith settlement demand and an itemization of economic and non-economic damages by each plaintiff and a good faith offer of settlement by each defendant. The statement must set forth and discuss in detail all facts and law pertinent to the issues of liability and damages involved in the case as to that party and comply with any additional requirement imposed by local rule.
  • (Subd (c)relettered and amended effective July 1, 2002; adopted as subd (d) effective January 1, 1985; previously amended effective January

(c) Joanne Hames

exhibits presumed auththentic
EXHIBITS PRESUMED AUTHTHENTIC
  • CERTIFIED COPIES OF PUBLIC DOCS
  • OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS
  • NEWSPAPERS AND PERIODICALS
  • TRANDE INSCRIPTIONS
  • NOTARIZED DOCS (BUT THEY CANNOT BE HEARSAY)
  • COMMERCIAL PAPER
  • SIGNATURES OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES AND FOREIGN OFFICIALS

(c) Joanne Hames

authenticating business records
AUTHENTICATING BUSINESS RECORDS
  • DRAFT DECLARATION OF CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS
    • RECORDS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT COPIES
    • RECORDS ARE KEPT IN ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS
    • SIGNED BY CUSTODIAN
    • EVID. CODE 1561

(c) Joanne Hames

authenticating other evidence
AUTHENTICATING OTHER EVIDENCE
  • WITNESS TESTIFIES THAT IT IS WHAT IT PURPORTS TO BE
  • I.E. PHOTOS

(c) Joanne Hames

jury instructions
JURY INSTRUCTIONS
  • California Civil Jury Instructions (Judicial Council)
  • B.A.J.I.
  • Special Instructions

(c) Joanne Hames

drafting proposed jury instructions
Drafting Proposed Jury Instructions
  • [1]--Format Each proposed instruction must [Cal. Rules of Ct., Rule 229(c) ]:
  • - Be on a separate page or pages;- Contain the instruction number and title of the instruction at the top of the first page of the instruction; and- Be prepared without any blank lines or unused bracketed portions, so that it can be read directly to the jury.

(c) Joanne Hames

drafting jury instructions
Drafting Jury Instructions
  • Each instruction presented, except instructions presented by CACI number reference, must have at the bottom of the page a citation of authorities which supports the instruction. No citation is required for approved instructions [Cal. Rules of Ct., Rule 229(d)

(c) Joanne Hames

slide177
Format of CACI Instructions Each proposed instruction must [Cal. Rules of Ct., Rule 229(c) ]:

- Be on a separate page or pages;- Contain the instruction number and title of the instruction at the top of the first page of the instruction; and- Be prepared without any blank lines or unused bracketed portions, so that it can be read directly to the jury.

Each set of proposed jury instructions must have a cover page, containing the caption of the case and stating the name of the party proposing the instructions, and an index listing all the proposed instructions [Cal. Rules of Ct., Rule 229(b)(2) ].In the index, approved jury instructions must be identified by their reference numbers. The index must contain a checklist that the court can utilize to indicate whether the instruction was [Cal. Rules of Ct., Rule 229(b)(3) ]:

(1) Given as proposed;(2) Given as modified;(3) Refused; or(4) Withdrawn.

Each set of proposed jury instructions must be bound loosely [Cal. Rules of Ct., Rule 229(b)(4) ].

(c) Joanne Hames

trial
TRIAL
  • VOIR DIRE
  • OPENING STATEMENTS
  • CASE IN CHIEF
  • DEFENSE
  • REBUTTAL
  • CLOSING ARGUMENTS
  • JURY INSTRUCTIONS

(c) Joanne Hames

evidence2
EVIDENCE
  • TESTIMONY
  • DEMONSTRATIVE
  • DOCUMENTARY
  • JUDICIAL NOTICE

(c) Joanne Hames

trial motions
TRIAL MOTIONS
  • IN LIMINE—EVIDENTIARY
  • NON SUIT
  • DIRECTED VERDICT

(c) Joanne Hames

post trial proceedings prevailing party
POST TRIAL PROCEEDINGS--PREVAILING PARTY
  • NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
  • COST BILL (MEMORANDUM OF COSTS)
  • COLLECTION
      • RECORDING ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT
      • ORDER OF EXAMINATION
      • WRIT OF EXECUTION/WAGE ATTACHMENT
      • FILE SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT

(c) Joanne Hames

post trial proceedings loser
POST TRIAL PROCEEDINGS --LOSER
  • STATEMENT OF DECISION (CT. TRIAL)
  • MOTIONS
      • NEW TRIAL
      • JUDGMENT N.O.V.
      • TAX COST
  • APPEAL
  • TIME LIMITS CRITICAL

(c) Joanne Hames

motion procedure
MOTION PROCEDURE
  • Similar to pretrial motions
    • File appropriate motions
    • Call trial department for date

(c) Joanne Hames

appeal
Appeal
  • Unlimited Jurisdiction
    • 60 days
  • Limited Jurisdiction
    • 30 days
    • Appellate division of Superior Court

(c) Joanne Hames

appeal1
Appeal
  • Notice of Appeal/Filing fee/Where filed
  • Request for Clerk’s Transcript and Reporter’s Transcript
  • Brief Requirements
    • Due dates
    • Covers
    • Content

(c) Joanne Hames

1000 essential factual elements
1000Essential Factual Elements

Paula Perry claims that she was harmed because of the way Joe Buff managed his property. To establish this claim, Paula Perry must prove all of the following:

  • That Joe Buff owned the property,
  • That Joe Buff was negligent in the use or maintenance of the pr operty,
  • That Paula Perry was harmed, and
  • That Joe Buff’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing Paula Perry’s harm.

(c) Joanne Hames

slide187
What is Computer Forensics?

“Computer Forensics is simply the application of computer investigation and analysis techniques in the interest of determining potential legal evidence.”

Judd Robbins

(c) Joanne Hames

slide188
The Three A’s

Basic methodology

  • Acquire
  • Authenticate
  • Analyze

(c) Joanne Hames

slide189
Bit Stream Image Copy

Original

Copy

(c) Joanne Hames

slide190
The Process
  • It is critical that you obtain an exact image
  • Computer evidence is fragile
  • The forensic methodology used must be completely non-invasive to the original data
  • Special forensic tools allow for safe recovery
  • The forensic process is run on the image

(c) Joanne Hames

slide191
Bit Stream Image vs File Copy

versus

Bit Stream

File

(c) Joanne Hames

slide192
So, what’s missing?
  • Deleted Files
  • File Remnants
  • Swap File Data

File Copy

(c) Joanne Hames

slide193
File slack

Hidden files

Unallocated space

Temporary files

History files

What is capable from a CF exam?

The nature of data storage on computer disks also often allows recovery of data from:

Formatted disks

(c) Joanne Hames

slide194
Who cares about the missing data?

Steinberg, Moorad, & Dunn vs. David Dunn

  • "This is a case about greed, fraud, betrayal, theft, attempted cover-up and extortion."
  • Departing partner stealing company client lists and/or files and contracts.
  • Memo had been deleted from a computer, but has been uncovered by forensic examiner.

$45 million

(c) Joanne Hames

ad