Framework for empowering pathology in the electronic health record
1 / 23

Framework for Empowering Pathology in the Electronic Health Record - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Framework for Empowering Pathology in the Electronic Health Record. Walter H. Henricks, MD, FCAP, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Jodi G. Daniel, JD, MPH, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Walter H. Henricks, MD, FCAP

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Framework for Empowering Pathology in the Electronic Health Record' - silvio

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Framework for empowering pathology in the electronic health record

  • Walter H. Henricks, MD, FCAP, RecordThe Cleveland Clinic Foundation

  • Jodi G. Daniel, JD, MPH, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

Walter h henricks md fcap framework for empowering pathology in the ehr may 8 2012

Walter H. Henricks, MD, FCAP Record

Framework for Empowering Pathology in the EHR

May 8, 2012

Objectives Record

  • Review HIT Regulatory Framework

  • Discuss Two Regulatory Challenges & Policy Solutions

  • Note What CAP Can Do & What You Can Do

Pathology s two challenges
Pathology Record’s Two Challenges

Challenge 1
Challenge #1 Record

  • Suboptimal management of laboratory information in EHRs

  • CPOE design and configurationissues

  • Potential patient safety issues

  • Hidden costs

Suboptimal lab data handling in ehr

This EHR report is garbled, I need to call the lab Record

Suboptimal Lab Data Handling in EHR

We don’t control the EHR, you’ll have to call IT

Example garbled pap report in ehr
Example: Garbled PAP report in EHR Record

  • Example of unpublicized “nonstandard” view of Pap smear result in EHR – garbled text

  • Not widely used; was not known to lab at time of interface validation

Lab data problem symptoms
Lab Data Problem Symptoms Record

  • Reference ranges, comments, footnotes

  • Abnormal result flags, preliminary reporting and updates

  • Improper handling of:

    • Corrected results

    • Unsolicited results

    • Reflex tests

    • Performing lab name & address

Poor cpoe symptoms
Poor CPOE Symptoms Record

  • Incorrect, incomplete, inappropriate test orders

  • Inefficient lab/provider operations

  • Billing & compliance problems

  • Pitfalls – future orders, duplicate handling, canceled orders

Policy initiatives cap
Policy Initiatives – CAP… Record

  • Has submitted extensive comments on ONC Stage 2 (2014) Standards & Certification Proposed rule

    • Need for FULL testing of pending laboratory reporting guide before implementation

    • Need for laboratory data/vocabulary integrity as it moves throughout healthcare system

  • Is working for pathologist role as laboratory data stewards in EHR environment

    • Developing white paper

  • Desires to partner with ONC and others on solutions

    • e.g. domain expertise for standards and/or certification criteria

Challenge 2
Challenge #2 Record

  • Pathologists are “non-hospital based” (per CMS definition) eligible providers (EPs) for MU incentives and penalties

  • Challenged by MU requirements to:

    • Use certified EHRs

    • Report specified objectives

    • Report clinical quality measures (CQMs)

Incentive penalty rule challenges
Incentive/Penalty Rule Challenges Record

  • Certified EHRs: Pathologists do not practice in EHRs

  • Report certain objectives: Objectives not applicable to pathology practice (written for office-based providers)

  • CQMs: Not applicable to pathology practice

Regulatory relief possible
Regulatory Relief Possible Record

  • CMS considering criteria for relief from penalties for eligible providers that:

    • Lack face-to-face/telemedicine interaction with patients

    • Lack follow-up with patients

    • Lack control over availability of certified EHRs at their practices

Legislative solution on the table
Legislative Solution on the Table Record

  • H.R. 4066, “The Health Information Technology Reform Act” introduced by Rep. Tom Price MD (R-GA-6)

    • Removes pathologists from eligibility for MU incentives or payment adjustments

    • Penalty relief would be permanent

What cap is doing
What CAP is Doing Record

  • Advocating for regulatory relief

  • Seeking passage of H.R. 4066

  • Developing white paper on best practices for lab data/transmission

What you can do at home
What You Can Do at Home Record

  • Advocate for patients’ laboratory information in EHR

  • Develop some expertise:

    • Intradepartmental

    • Institutional

  • Raise awareness and provide domain expertise at institutional level

What you can do here
What You Can Do Here Record

  • When you visit your Senators/Congressmen….

  • Ask them to support H.R. 4066!

Summary Record

  • ARRA hastening EHR adoption

  • CAP working to advance HIT and protect pathologists

  • You have a role in DC and at home

  • Constructive dialogue with policymakers & other stakeholders to continue