Composite Root End Fillings. Bond strength measurements are probably not important. Tendency to develop gaps is probably very important. Important and Non Important. Cytotoxicity.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Tendency to develop gaps is probably very importantImportant and Non Important
Valux Plus composite (3M), Dyract and F2000 compomers and Oralloy amalgam were equally biocompatible.
Adhesion of osteoblasts to composite same as MTA.
There was no significant difference of microleakage between a dentin-bonded resin, Super-EBA, and mineral trioxide aggregate.
Jensen SS, Nattestad A, Egdø P, Sewerin I, Munksgaard EC, Schou S: A prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study of resin composite and glass ionomer cement for retrograde root filling. Clin Oral Invest 2002;6:236-243
Seems to hold up over time much better than GI’s
* (This assures flash of resin is bonded to the root as it is first choice to not disturb the finished restoration with mechanical finishing.)