1 / 12

Internal structure of f 0 (980) meson by fragmentation functions

Internal structure of f 0 (980) meson by fragmentation functions. M. Hirai (TUS) Collaborators: S. Kumano(KEK), M. Oka(TiTech), K. Sudoh (Nishogakusha) Phys. Rev D77 017504 (2008); arXiv:0708.1816   [hep-ph] 2008, Dec. 7 @Nagoya. Contents. Introduction Fragmentation functions

sidone
Download Presentation

Internal structure of f 0 (980) meson by fragmentation functions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Internal structure of f0(980) mesonby fragmentation functions M. Hirai (TUS) Collaborators: S. Kumano(KEK), M. Oka(TiTech), K. Sudoh (Nishogakusha) Phys. Rev D77 017504 (2008); arXiv:0708.1816  [hep-ph] 2008, Dec. 7 @Nagoya

  2. Contents • Introduction • Fragmentation functions • Global analysis • Possible f0(980) configurations • Results & discussion • Behavior of obtained FFs • 2nd moments of FFs • Summary

  3. Introduction • Internal structure of exotic hadrons • Parton distribution functions (PDFs) • Measured by deeply inelastic scattering (DIS ) experiments • Need stable targets (ex. proton) • Exotic hadron ? • Decay • Short life time, no stable target • Produced hadrons in e+e- scattering • p, k, p, a0, f0, et al. • Fragmentation functions (FFs) • Information about internal structure of produced hadrons

  4. Favored F Disfavored F Z=Eh/Eq Fragmentation Functions (FFs) • Information of hadronization • Containing no perturbative object • Determined by a global analysis with experimental data in e++e h+X • Similar behavior to PDFs • Favored FF: like valence quarks • A constituent of produced hadrons • Peak position at medium and large-z • Disfavored FF: like sea quarks • Peak position at small-z

  5. : scaling variable : j →isplitting function Global analysis of FF • Cross sections: observable • DGLAP equation: • Scale Q=mF=mR =s: center of mass energy Coefficient Function calculable in pQCD Fragmentation Function extracted from experiments

  6. Fragmentation functions of f0(980) • Functional form of initial distributions at Q02 • Constraint condition • 2nd moment should be finite and less than 1

  7. Possible f0(980) configurations

  8. c2/d.o.f. = 0.907 Total # of data: 23 Tetra quark configuration Becoming favored FFs for light and strange quarks Peak position at large-z (z~0.85) zumax ~ zsmax SS configuration Mu/Ms=0.43  6.73 Mu < Ms Large uncertainty Need precise measurements to reduce their huge uncertainties 2nd moments Mu=0.0012  0.0107 Ms=0.0027  0.0183 Mg=0.0090  0.0046 Results

  9. Internal structure of the exotic hadron from fragmentation functions Global analysis of FFs with the data of the f0(980) production Favored & disfavored FFs: valence & sea quarks Peak position: zmax Relation between the 2nd moments of FFs Intuitive estimation of order counting for the f0(980) production in various quark configurations Indicating tetra-quark and ss configuration Tetra-quark: peak position of the up(down) & strange quark FFs SS : relation of the 2nd moments Huge uncertainties of the FFs and 2nd moments Low accuracy of experimental data Need precise measurements from Bell, BaBar experiments Model predictions for the FFs Relation between behavior of FFs and quark configurations Summary

  10. Data sets of f0(980) HRS:4 (s=29.0 GeV, 0.165< z <0.554) PRL 57, 1990 (1986) OPAL:8 (s=91.2 GeV, 0.092< z < 0.75) EPJ C4,19 (1998) DELPHI:10 (s=91.2 GeV, 0.078< z < 0.7) PL 449B,364 (1999),ZP C65, 587 (1995) Total # of data: 23 NLO analysis MS scheme Reduction of theoretical uncertainty c2/d.o.f. = 0.907 Q2 dependence of pol-PDFs DGLAP eq Q02 = 1GeV2 Minimizing c2 Error estimation Hessian method D2 (N=12) = 13.74 Global analysis of FFs

  11. Comparison of data with theory • Large uncertainty • Consistent with deviation of experimental data with their errors • Rather large uncertainty at low Q2 • Reducing the uncertainties • Needs of precise data • Wide rage of Q2 • Determination of gluon FF • Belle experiment s~10 GeV • Heavy quark tagged data • Charm, bottom quark → f0(980)

More Related