overpressure and slope stability in prograding clinoforms implications for marine morphodynamics n.
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Matthew A. Wolinsky and Lincoln F. Pratson

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 20

Matthew A. Wolinsky and Lincoln F. Pratson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Overpressure and Slope Stability in Prograding Clinoforms : Implications for Marine Morphodynamics. Matthew A. Wolinsky and Lincoln F. Pratson. Presentation by Kevyn Bollinger OCE 582 Seabed Geotechnics 11/13/2008. What are a prograding clinoforms?. Each layer is a clinoform .

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Matthew A. Wolinsky and Lincoln F. Pratson' - shyla

Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
overpressure and slope stability in prograding clinoforms implications for marine morphodynamics

Overpressure and Slope Stability in ProgradingClinoforms:Implications for Marine Morphodynamics

Matthew A. Wolinsky

and Lincoln F. Pratson

Presentation by Kevyn Bollinger

OCE 582 Seabed Geotechnics


what are a prograding clinoforms
What are a prograding clinoforms?
  • Each layer is a clinoform.
  • Progradingclinoforms means clinoforms stacking up on top of each other in a prograding sequence.

Depositional Pattern

Spatial Distribution

clinoform kinematics
Clinoform Kinematics

q[x,t] sediment flux

r[t]=ro+Vtclinoform rollover point

h[x,t] sediment surface- evolves through time

S Slope

V Velocity of progradation

clinoform kinematics1
Clinoform Kinematics


We get

For the basal boundary conditions

groundwater mechanics
Groundwater Mechanics


  • Impermeable basal surface
  • Saturated deposit
  • Small surface slopes (S<<1)
  • Strains uni-axial and infinitesimal
  • Solids and liquids (grains and pores) incompressible
  • Homogeneous
  • Hydraulic conductivity aligned with depositional layers

Overpressure evolution

Gibson (1958, Bedehoeft and Hanshaw 1968

k= hydraulic diffusivity

h[x,z,t]=excess pressure head,

Sediment submerged specific gravity

non dimensionalizing

Three time scales

Non-dimensional Overpressure

x*=x/L z*=z/H h*=h/H h*=h/coRH

Overpressure generation expressed in terms of two dimensionless parameters:

Gibson Number (loading intensity) Effective anisotropy (horizontal flow potential)

Gb<<1 vertical diffusion slow compared to loading -> overpressure buildup

Gb>>1 vertical diffusion fast compared to loading -> overpressure dissipation

e<<1 vertical diffusion dominates

e>>1 horizontal diffusion dominates

overpressure prediction
Overpressure Prediction

Shaded Areas: Time averaged Loading, Gb White Areas: Instantaneous Loading, Gb

A: Convex (“Gibson delta”) – depositional rate decreases with time

B: Linear (“Gilbert delta”) – depositional rate constant with time

C: Oblique (concave) – depositional rate increases with time

D: Sigmoidal (convexo-concave) – depositional rate cyclic

overpressure prediction1
Overpressure Prediction

Examples: A-Yellow River, B-Gravel delta front Peyto Lake in Banff NP, C-Colorado river delta at lake Meade, D- Gargano subaqueous delta

slope stability and liquefaction potential
Slope Stability and Liquefaction Potential

Shear failure occurs when:

t= shear stress,

tc=shear strength,

m=internal friction coefficient,


Assume: Slope small and Curvature small

Liquefaction potential:


failure modes
Failure Modes
  • Surface Liquefaction
    • Liquefaction potential greatest at surface
    • Threshold for liquefaction greater than Gb=~10
  • Basal Slumping
    • Requires exceedance of a critical slope

Normalized Failure Slope

surface liquefaction
Surface Liquefaction

Liquefaction at:

basal slumping
Basal Slumping

Liquefaction at:


Test Cases

  • 14 clinoforms
  • Historic maps and surveys
  • Seismic Profiles
  • 210Pb
results and implications
Results and Implications

All cases have evidence of slumping/liquefaction.

  • Jersey
    • Well below threshold levels
  • Amazon
    • Fluid Muds
    • Permeably sand

Predicted positive relationship between sediment supply and slope evident?

limitations of simplified model
Limitations of Simplified Model
  • Compaction
    • Method ignores effects of compations
  • Slope Failure
    • slope failure inherently uncertain due to effects of transient events
  • Heterogeneity and Anisotropy
    • Assumed kz>>kx
  • Boundary Conditions
    • Drained/ Undrained
  • Deposition highly localized in space and time.
  • Model developed predicts overpressure and slope stability as a function of sediment supply
  • Slope is inversely proportional to supply
  • Overpressure is of first order significance to marine morphodynamics

Role of Turbidity Currents in Setting the Foreset Slope of ClinoformsPrograding into Standing Fresh Water

Svetlana Kostic, Gary Parker and Jeffrey G. Marr

  • Abstract: Clinoforms produced where sand-bed rivers flow into lakes andreservoirs often do not form Gilbert deltas prograding at ornear the angle of repose. The maximum slope of the sandy foresetin Lake Mead, for example, is slightly below 1°. Most sand-bedrivers also carry copious amounts of mud as wash load. The muddywater often plunges over the sandy foreset and then overridesit as a muddy turbidity current. It is hypothesized here thata muddy turbidity current overriding a sandy foreset can substantiallyreduce the foreset angle. An experiment reveals a reductionof foreset angle of 20 percent due to an overriding turbiditycurrent. Scale-up to field dimensions using densimetric Froudesimilarity indicates that the angle can be reduced to as lowas 1° by this mechanism. The process of angle reductionis self-limiting in that a successively lower foreset anglepushes the plunge point successively farther out, so mitigatingfurther reduction in foreset angle.
  • Highly relevant to paper due to discussion of previous research on sandy delta foreset angle