1 / 25

Alliance Teacher effectiveness 2012

Alliance Teacher effectiveness 2012. July 2012 Derrick Chau, VP TCRP Diane Fiello , TCRP Coach Harris Luu , TCRP Coach http://TCRPalliance.wordpress.com/. Objectives. To review the teacher evaluation process To learn about the proposed teacher compensation plan

shika
Download Presentation

Alliance Teacher effectiveness 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Alliance Teacher effectiveness 2012 July 2012 Derrick Chau, VP TCRP Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach Harris Luu, TCRP Coach http://TCRPalliance.wordpress.com/

  2. Objectives • To review the teacher evaluation process • To learn about the proposed teacher compensation plan • To explore potential teacher career path options • To review the timeline for implementing teacher performance compensation • To learn about planned data system implementation

  3. IMPORTANT NOTE • This presentation provides draft information about the current Alliance teacher effectiveness process • All contents are subject to change

  4. TCRP Theoretical Framework • Effective Principals • Support • Evaluate • Effective Teachers • Recruit • Support • Evaluate • Compensate • Increase Student Achievement • Data Systems

  5. Multiple Measures of Teacher Effectiveness CST-Tested Subjects Non-CST-Tested Subjects

  6. Overall Teacher Evaluation • The objective of the new teacher evaluation process is to promote and compensate based on high teacher performance and/or teacher growth with student results. • Teachers should be retained if they demonstrate sufficient growth in their practice during the year.

  7. Framework for Effective Teaching Domain 1 Data-Driven Planning and Preparation Standard 1.1 Establish standards-based learning objectives for instructional plans Indicators A) Selection of objectives B) Measurability of objectives 4 Domains 17 Standards 38 Indicators, 4 levels of performance

  8. Overall Teacher Evaluation Rating Standards-Based Determination • Overall teacher FET ratings are based on a running record throughout the school year. • Ratings from formal observations overwrite prior scores. • Unannounced observations increase or decrease scores by at most .5 points. • Domain 4 evidence (nonobservational) ratings overwrite prior scores during the year

  9. Observation Process Improvement • Revisions to the Teacher Effectiveness Framework will: • Clarify language in rubrics • Reduce ambiguity in rubric language • NOT change standards/indicators • Timelines will shift earlier due to earlier school start date • Online evidence collection for observation process will be utilized • Considering appeals process for teacher evaluations

  10. Overall Teacher Effectiveness Determination

  11. Student Growth Percentile Levels

  12. Teacher Effectiveness Levels

  13. Example Math Teacher Scorecard Calculation Teacher Effectiveness Level = Achieving

  14. Teacher Performance Compensation Timeline

  15. Teacher Compensation • The purpose of the teacher effectiveness initiative is to shift from step/column compensation to performance compensation • 2012-13 school year will shift from school-wide performance bonus to teacher effectiveness-aligned bonus • Fall 2013 will mark the shift to performance salary compensation

  16. Current Teacher Compensation Performance Bonus Available = $2,750

  17. Planned Fall 2012 Teacher Bonus Performance Bonus Available = $2,750

  18. Planned 2013-14 Teacher Compensation Assumptions: Each pay band = 8% Gap between bands = 3%

  19. Teacher Compensation Rules • Performance for two consecutive years is required to move up/down in bands • Increase for one year results in 2% increase • Decrease or same result for one year results in no increase/decrease

  20. Teacher Career Pathways • Purpose of performance evaluation is to also identify and retain highly effective teachers • Highly effective teachers may seek other opportunities for professional growth

  21. Planned Career Pathways

  22. TCRP Theoretical Framework • Effective Principals • Support • Evaluate • Effective Teachers • Recruit • Support • Evaluate • Compensate • Increase Student Achievement • Data Systems

  23. Data System Overview

  24. Instructional Systems Overview

  25. Data Systems Timeline

More Related