1 / 7

OPEN HOUSE Case study report Project RS.3

OPEN HOUSE Case study report Project RS.3. Project RS.3. UNI Campus Nis, Serbia. Source: Construction cluster DUNDJER Nis, Serbia. OPEN HOUSE Case study report Project RS.3. Project description.

shelley-howell
Download Presentation

OPEN HOUSE Case study report Project RS.3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OPEN HOUSE Case studyreport Project RS.3 Project RS.3 UNI Campus Nis, Serbia Source: Construction cluster DUNDJER Nis, Serbia

  2. OPEN HOUSE Case studyreport Project RS.3 Project description The building is part of the bigger settlement, located in the northern part of city of Nis. Building was completed in 2004. and it consists of residential (75%) and commercial (25%) part. Building has 5 storeys, and the surface area of foundation is 442,65 m2. Floor plan • Main sustainability aspects • Aspect 1 – Environmental quality • Aspect 2 – Social functional quality • Aspect 3 – Location Section

  3. OPEN HOUSE Case studyreport Project RS.3 Results

  4. OPEN HOUSE Case studyreport Project RS.3 Results

  5. OPEN HOUSE Case studyreport Project RS.3 Special issue Description of one aspect of the assessment that is particularly interesting. ECONOMIC QUALITY: In spite of difficulties to make as exact as possible assessment of economic quality, one can say that it belongs to most important ones. The source of difficulties could be in the fact that (estimated) bill of quantities could be out of date, or in some way exaggerated due to unrealistic prices of some materials and works, using some not longer used materials and equipment, and, in some countries, local rate of inflation (over 10 %). Even a best assessment could be ruined by stock market in the real estate sector and any kind of bank loans crisis. Sensitivity analysis is even more complex.

  6. OPEN HOUSE Case studyreport Project RS.3 Feedback: summary of main issues - Cons/Problems + Pros/Advantages • Online platform, • Online Assessment tool, • Assessment Package, • Assessment methodology (categories, indicators, sub-indicators), • Documentation requirements. • LCA online tool (to be refined)

  7. OPEN HOUSE Case studyreport Project RS.3 Feedback: suggestions for refinement • SOCIAL/FUNCTIONAL QUALITY 1: This criterion, in spite being mutually dependent, could be divided in two separate groups, i.e. Social and (Technically) Functional. This could stress some criteria, like 2.15.3 Power and Media Supply. Namely, media supply became nowadays extremely important, to be qualified as independent criterion. Media in building could be internal (local information system), which is extremely important in urgent situations, and external, of no less importance. • To the (multi) cultural tradition and civilization diversity of building occupants/tenants, especially regarding to the minorities, could be paid more attention. • SOCIAL/FUNCTIONAL QUALITY 2: To thesocial quality belongs, especially in Europe, building (in the sense of architecture, but not only to it) tradition and heritage, and also tradition of living, which could be regional, national and even global. This criterion could belong to „cultural“ comfort of building, hard to be defined, but extremely important for multi-cultural cohabitation of building occupants.

More Related