1 / 7

Discussion by Reena Aggarwal Conference on Small and Medium Enterprises October 14-15, 2004

Financial and Legal Institutions and Firm Size Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt and Vojislav Maksimovic. Discussion by Reena Aggarwal Conference on Small and Medium Enterprises October 14-15, 2004 World Bank, MC 4-800. ISSUE Relationship Between Firm Size and

shelby
Download Presentation

Discussion by Reena Aggarwal Conference on Small and Medium Enterprises October 14-15, 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Financial and Legal Institutions and Firm SizeThorsten Beck, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt and Vojislav Maksimovic Discussion by Reena Aggarwal Conference on Small and Medium Enterprises October 14-15, 2004 World Bank, MC 4-800

  2. ISSUE • Relationship Between Firm Size and • Legal System/Financial Institutions • Positive Relationship: Larger firms are • more complex, difficult to monitor/control, • Need to control for expropriation by • insiders • 2) Negative Relationship: Larger firms can serve as internal markets and more effective in resource mobilization

  3. RESULTS • Positive relationship between firm size and legal system/financial institutions • Legal system/financial institutions foster larger firms by allowing better access to finance and more effective capital allocation

  4. COMMENTS • 1) Firm-Level Analysis • Why have you left out firm-level variables? • Is it “largeness” alone or is it factors like concentration and float? • Why not interaction of country and firm • rather than just country and industry?

  5. COMMENTS • 2) Global Access to Capital • Large firms – “able to choose their boundaries and determine their size without constraint” • What about global access to capital? • Pakistan (68 firms) versus Mexico (52 firms) but Pakistan has 5 ADRs and Mexico has more than 40.

  6. COMMENTS • 2) Global Access to Capital • Other forms of monitoring • Siegel, 2004

  7. CONCLUSION • INTERESTING ISSUE • NICELY EXECUTED PAPER • CLEAR RESULTS • ROBUSTNESS CHECKS

More Related