Hemisphere Asymmetries
400 likes | 605 Views
Hemisphere Asymmetries. Can asymmetries be explained in terms of general dichotomy?. Hemisphere Asymmetries. Spatial Frequency Hypothesis. Sergent (1982) Left hemisphere more adept at processing high spatial frequency information
Hemisphere Asymmetries
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Hemisphere Asymmetries • Can asymmetries be explained in terms of general dichotomy?
Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Sergent (1982) • Left hemisphere more adept at processing high spatial frequency information • Right hemisphere more adept at processing low spatialfrequency information
Spatial Frequencies Low Medium High
Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Sergent (1982) • Left hemisphere more adept at processing high spatial frequency information • Right hemisphere more adept at processing low spatialfrequency information • Receptive field size • Small in left hemisphere • Large in right hemisphere
Visual Receptive Fields • On center / off surround • Accentuates edges
Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Kitterle et al. (1990) • Present sinusoidal gratings to left and right hemisphere using divided-visual field • Decide whether grating is wide or narrow Wide Narrow
Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Kitterle et al. (1990) Response time (ms) Hemisphere
Spatial Frequency Hypothesis • Kitterle et al. (1990) • Present sinusoidal gratings to left and right hemisphere using divided-visual field • Decide whether grating is wide or narrow • Faster at narrow than wide in left hemisphere
But Wait… • Does this mean that hemispheres are more or less adept depending on the size of the stimulus? • In early visual areas, yes • In later visual areas, no • Size information is processed separately from shape information in high-level vision areas • Receptive fields receive information from other neurons
Hemisphere Asymmetries • Split-brain patients • Language in left • Spatial in right • Asymmetric brain damage • Associative agnosias (Farah, 1991) • Abstract/parts in left • Specific/wholes in right • Divided-visual field with normal subjects • Categorical vs. coordinate (Kosslyn et al., 1989) • Local vs. global (Van Kleeck, 1989) • Abstract vs. specific (Marsolek, 1995, 1999)
Local vs. Global Unfiltered Low-pass filtered (No high frequencies) High-pass filtered (No low frequencies)
Spatial Relationships • Low frequency information may be insufficient for above-below decision when dot is close to line • Left hemisphere better at categorical judgments than right because high frequency information is needed in the close condition
Receptive Field Size • Large receptive fields can overlap with each other • Allows coding of very specific information • Allows effective coding of wholes
Receptive Field Size • Large receptive fields can overlap with each other • Allows coding of very specific information • Allows effective coding of wholes • Small receptive fields cannot overlap as much • Does not allow coding of very specific information • Allows effective coding of parts
Wait…What About Faces? • Pascalis et al. (1995) • 4-day old infants look longer at mother’s face than at stranger • Can recognize face • Infants cannot resolve high spatial frequencies
Wait…What About Faces? • Pascalis et al. (1995) • 4-day old infants look longer at mother’s face than at stranger • Can recognize face • Infants cannot resolve high spatial frequencies • Low spatial frequencies suffice for face recognition
Speech Comprehension • Understanding streams of spoken words requires processing high-temporal frequencies • Left hemisphere adept with high-temporal frequencies • Left hemisphere better than right at spoken word comprehension • Comprehending prosody requires processing low-temporal frequencies • Right hemisphere adept with low-temporal frequencies • Right hemisphere better than left at prosodic comprehension
Hemisphere Asymmetries • Split-brain patients • Language in left • Spatial in right • Asymmetric brain damage • Associative agnosias (Farah, 1991) • Abstract/parts in left • Specific/wholes in right • Divided-visual field with normal subjects • Categorical vs. coordinate (Kosslyn et al., 1989) • Local vs. global (Van Kleeck, 1989) • Abstract vs. specific (Marsolek, 1995, 1999) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Many, Many More… • Emotion • Expressing, perceiving • RH > LH • Valence • RH = negative; LH = positive • Action • RH = withdraw; LH = approach • Stereotyping • LH > RH • Music • RH > LH
Asymmetries in Non-Humans • Chickens and pigeons • Left hemisphere advantage for categorizing food vs. non-food items • Right hemisphere advantage for learning exact location of food source • Macaque monkey • Left hemisphere lesions impair comprehension of vocalizations by other macaques • Right hemisphere lesions impair face discrimination