1 / 31

Holmdel High School PTSO Meeting 11 November 2013

Holmdel High School PTSO Meeting 11 November 2013. Principal’s Report. “Sustaining Excellence” Grading Policies and Exam Weights Parent Conferences. Updates. Middle States Update Mission Statement.

sharla
Download Presentation

Holmdel High School PTSO Meeting 11 November 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Holmdel High SchoolPTSO Meeting11 November 2013

  2. Principal’s Report • “Sustaining Excellence” • Grading Policies and Exam Weights • Parent Conferences

  3. Updates

  4. Middle States UpdateMission Statement Holmdel High School, in a safe, student-centered, and rigorous learning environment, promotes academics, athletics, and the arts, values the cultural diversity of its community and, through varied curricular and co-curricular programs, empowers all students to develop their potential into achievement and take their place in our global society as ethical decision makers and life-long learners.

  5. Parent Surveys Areas of Strength Areas in Need of Improvement Quality of student services; Career awareness activities; Quality of food service; Class placement; Opportunities for parents to participate in school improvement planning. • Strength of academic program; • Student access to a wide variety of extra-curricular activities; • All stakeholders feel safe; • Commitment of staff to students and to school; • Positive relations between school leaders and parents.

  6. Middle States – Next Steps • Sub Committees • 12 Standards • Academic Integrity • Service Learning

  7. Considering Grades and Exams at Holmdel High School

  8. Mid-Term and Final ExamsFailure Rate

  9. How did we get here? • Limited value due to low weight • Students don’t take them seriously enough • Not most efficient use of time • No clear vision as to their purpose • Affected by grade scale and method of grade reporting

  10. Process • Spring 2011 • Discussion at BIC Meetings • Exam Analysis • Fall 2011 • Gathering Data from Top NJ Schools • Surveys (Staff – Students – Parents) • Evaluate Options • Make Recommendations to BOE (Dec. 2011)

  11. Problem: • How to balance the concerns of students and parents (stress), while at the same time designing meaningful and appropriately rigorous assessments?

  12. Recommendations For the 2012-2013 school year: • Increase weight of final exam to 10% of overall grade (exam would be departmental in nature, and would embrace UbD principles); • Continue to administer a mid-year assessment, but embed it in 2nd MP (10% of MP grade), eliminating mid-term time schedule (assessment would be developed and administered by individual teachers); • Offer exemptions for ALL students with an “A” average going into final exam (full year courses only)

  13. Recommendations Beyond the 2012-2013 school year: • Consider reporting number grades on transcripts rather than letter grades; • Consider modification of grading scale to reward high achievement within letter grade (i.e. “plusses”)

  14. C & I Committee Reaction - Concerns about a “band-aid” approach; perhaps the root of the problem was in the grade scale - Asked for more information about how other school set grade scales; IF a change to our grade scale was made, could render moot the issue of exam weights

  15. Our Current Grade Scale

  16. How to Report Grades? Letters? Numbers? Plusses (+) / Minuses(-) ? Effect on GPA?

  17. Current Scale - Letters Strengths Limitations Doesn’t reward effort within a grade category Lessens level of student motivation May hurt some students with college admissions • Allows for variance in grading • Lessens level of student stress • Allows students to be in best light with college admissions

  18. Numerical Strengths Limitations Consistency of Grading Student Stress • All grades are in play and all assessments matter • Complete Transparency

  19. Plusses (+) and Minuses (-) Strengths Limitations Consistency of Grading Greater Student Stress • Greater Transparency • Greater Student Motivation

  20. What Do Other Schools Do?

  21. What Might a Revised Grade Scale Look Like?

  22. Now, back to those exams….

  23. Mid-Term and Final ExamsFailure Rate

  24. The landscape is changing…

  25. 2014-2015Academic Assessment Calendar • September / October • SGO Pre-Assessments • January • Mid-Terms; SGO Monitoring • March • PARCC and SGO Post-Assessment • May • AP Exams and NJ Biology Competency Test (BCT) • June • PARCC and Final Exams

  26. Considerations • Maintain Status Quo – 10% of Overall Grade • Double Weight of Exams – 20% of Overall Grade • No Mid-Terms – Finals ONLY – 10% of Overall Grade • Quarterly Exams – embedded in each Marking Period • No Exams – 25% for each Marking Period What impact, if any, will a change in the grade scale have?

  27. Next Steps • Next meeting with C&I Committee – Nov. 13th NOTE: Any changes will go into effect for 2014-2015 school year

  28. Parent Conferences

  29. Parent Conferences • Thursday, Dec. 5th • 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm • Friday, Dec. 6th • 12:40 pm to 2:00 pm • Tuesday, Dec. 10th • 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm

  30. Questions

More Related