An Integrated Resource Planning for Multiple Software Projects. 指導教授：葉榮懋 學生：朱獻翔 學號： M97U0222. C ontents. Abstract Introduction Research Background Workflow of Projects Taguchi ' s Parameter Design Experimental Results Conclusion. Abstract.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
2. Noise Factors 1 and 2, are taken as examples for developing proper project planning of multiple-software project with multiple resources. To present the workflow of these two projects, an augmenting CRD for both projects is shown in Figure 2.
In this section, experimental results of FIFS and SASP heuristic methods for multiple software projects are compared and summarized as follows:
1. The optimal condition is A1B2C1D2E1F2 by using FIFS, while A1B2C1D2E1F1by using SASP. It is clear that overtime is not necessary for resource F.
2. For FIFS method, the resulting total cost is $ 458,560 =343029 + 1115531 for Project 1 and 2; for SASP method, the total cost is $ 441,949=343882 + 98067. Hence SASP can achieve lower cost than FIFS.
3 For Project 1, both, heuristic methods achieve same project duration time of 86 day. For Project 2, SASP obtains shorter duration time (29 Days) than FIFS (43 Days). On the other hand, since the objective in this experiment is total project cost instead of duration, it is clear that duration for the optimal condition it minimized.